1 / 23

A post-Kyoto partner: Considering the ozone regime as a venue to manage nitrous oxide

November 13, 2012 MOP 24 – Geneva, Switzerland. A post-Kyoto partner: Considering the ozone regime as a venue to manage nitrous oxide. David Kanter A.R. Ravishankara Ian Porter. Outline.

ilyssa
Télécharger la présentation

A post-Kyoto partner: Considering the ozone regime as a venue to manage nitrous oxide

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. November 13, 2012 MOP 24 – Geneva, Switzerland A post-Kyoto partner: Considering the ozone regime as a venue to manage nitrous oxide David Kanter A.R. Ravishankara Ian Porter

  2. Outline • Preview of forthcoming paper: “A post-Kyoto partner: Considering the ozone regime as a venue to manage nitrous oxide” – under review at the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science • Authors: David Kanter (Princeton), Denise Mauzerall (Princeton), A.R. Ravishankara (NOAA), John Daniel (NOAA), Bob Portmann (NOAA), Pete Grabiel, Bill Moomaw (Tufts), Jim Galloway (U. of Virginia) • Paper goal: An objective examination of major scientific, legal, technical and policy issues surrounding a potential decision by the Parties to take on N2O

  3. Ozone Depletion Potential of N2O ODP of N2O = 0.017 Compare 0.017 for N2O with: HCFC-123 = 0.02; HCFC-124 = 0.022; HCFC-225ca = 0.025; HCFC-225cb = 0.033 ODP depends on: amount of sulfate aerosol, chlorine, and T To our knowledge, this is the first time ODP of N2O was calculated as in the case of the Montreal Protocol gases N2O side event_13Nov_2012. Geneva 2012

  4. A significant part of N2O emission is of human origin • Preindustrial level ~270 parts per billion (ppb) • Increases in N2O is due to human activity • Anthropogenic sources: agricultural fertilization, combustion, industrial production, etc. • Current level ~325 ppb • [N2O] increasing at ~0.25% (of total) per year; i.e., ~1% of anthropogenic component per year. N2O side event_13Nov_2012. Geneva 2012

  5. Emissions, concentrations, and human-influenced contributions Anthropogenic 55 ppbv 6.7 TgN/yr 11 TgN/yr 270 ppbv Current Emissions Current Atmospheric Concentrations Natural • Large Natural Emissions • Even larger natural concentrations- due to lifetime and previous emissions • Anthropogenic concentrations growing rapidly • Very similar to CO2! N2O side event_13Nov_2012. Geneva 2012

  6. ODP alone does not tell the story ODP-weighted emission of anthropogenic N2O • ODP-weighted-emission of anthropogenic N2O was the fourth largest emission even in 1987, i.e., prior to the MP. • Anthropogenic N2O is now the largest ozone depletion gas emission • N2O’s ODP is small- but its emissions are large • If unabated, it will continues its growth in the 21st century; even the most optimistic projections shows an increasing N2O trend N2O side event_13Nov_2012. Geneva 2012

  7. Ozone layer benefit of reducing a GHG N2O side event_13Nov_2012. Geneva 2012

  8. Summarizing N2O issues N2O, when viewed as any other ozone-depleting substance (CFCs, Halons, methyl bromide,…), has an ODP of ~0.02. ODP weighted emission of anthropogenic N2O is very large Anthropogenic N2O is now the largest manmade ozone-depleting gas emission(a recent development owing to the successful abatement of CFCs and other ODSs under the Montreal Protocol!), and it will remain so for the next century if anthropogenic emissions of N2O are unabated. Reductions in N2O emissions or stabilization of N2O will have climate and ozone layer benefits. N2O side event_13Nov_2012. Geneva 2012

  9. Why wasn’t N2O considered before?

  10. Ozone regime’s legal authority • N2O is largest known remaining anthropogenic threat to stratospheric ozone layer (Ravishankara et al. 2009) • Neither VC nor MP define “ozone depleting substance” for purposes of inclusion under ozone regime (Art. 1, MP & VC) • N2O included in list of substances that “modify the chemical and physical properties of the ozone layer” under VC (Art. 3 & Annex I at (4)(b)) N2O could therefore be controlled under ozone regime

  11. Legal pathways for N2O’s inclusion • Amendment to MP (Art. 2(10) – MP) or new protocol under VC (Art. 2, 8 – VC) • Historical focus on regulating production and consumption could be useful for managing agricultural N2O emissions e.g. fertilizer efficiency standards

  12. Interaction with current and post-2012 climate regime • Establishing controls for N2O under ozone regime consistent with UNFCCC principles & ultimate objective (Article 2-3, UNFCCC). • UNFCCC already delegates responsibility (aviation to ICAO, marine bunker fuels to IMO). • Legal provisions could limit potential conflicts of authority (Grabiel & Roberts, 2010) • Post-2012 climate regime in flux

  13. Emissions & mitigation opportunities

  14. Non-agricultural N2O mitigation References – SEI (2010), IPCC (2006), EPA (2006), EPA (2012), Winiwarter (2005)

  15. Agriculture - Behavior • Fertilizer best management practices (Robertson & Vitousek 2009): • Crop residue recycling & use of cover crops • Precision & split fertilizer application • Watershed management • Livestock management • 4Rs: Right product, right rate, right time, right place (IFA, 2007) • Consumer behavioral changes – food wastage, meat consumption…

  16. Agriculture - Technology References – Mosier et al. (2004), Akiyama et al. (2009), O’Brien & Mullins (2009), Shrawat et al. (2008)

  17. Nitrification inhibitors in action • Ian Porter presentation

  18. Existing policies - Direct • Non-agricultural N2O: • UNFCCC Kyoto Protocol • EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) • US EPA/Dept. of Transportation • Australia Carbon Tax & UK Climate Change Act • Agricultural N2O: • Alberta Quantification Protocol for Agricultural N2O Emissions Reductions (Canada) • Carbon Farming Initiative (Australia) • American Carbon Registry • US Climate Action Reserve

  19. Existing policies - Indirect • Reactive N (indirect impact on N2O): • Water Framework Directive (EU) – NO3- • Safe Drinking Water Act, Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act (USA) – NO3-, NOx, NH3 • Convention on Long Range Transport of Air Pollution (1988 Sofia Protocol, 1999 Gothenburg Protocol) – NOx, NH3

  20. Challenges & opportunities to managing agricultural N2O • Food security • How to preserve and increase crop yields while reducing N2O? • Equity • How to allow regions that vastly under-fertilize to increase fertilizer use while globally reducing N2O? • Nitrogen cascade • Tight coupling of N cycle means that one atom of nitrogen can cascade through a variety of chemical forms, each with a different impact on environment

  21. Conclusions • N2O largest remaining known anthropogenic threat to stratospheric ozone layer • Ozone regime’s legal authority and possibility of cooperation with climate regime clear • Mitigation opportunities exist across all major sectors • Challenges & opportunities exist for any international attempt to manage N2O • Could mark welcome expansion of sustainable development diplomacy

  22. Possible next steps • Parties could request TEAP scoping report (“Task Force”) on technical & economic feasibility of specific N2O control strategies • MLF could look to its experience with MeBr for general lessons on dealing with agricultural sector • Implementation strategy could begin with point sources, then expand

More Related