1 / 11

Recognition and Understanding of Prosody

Recognition and Understanding of Prosody. Scott Simpson. Overview. Prosody and Speech Recognition Overview of prosody in the context of linguistics, general and computational. Approaches to prosodic modeling Overview of successful approaches of prosodic modeling

Télécharger la présentation

Recognition and Understanding of Prosody

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recognition and Understanding of Prosody Scott Simpson Ling 575: Spoken Dialog Systems

  2. Overview • Prosody and Speech Recognition • Overview of prosody in the context of linguistics, general and computational. • Approaches to prosodic modeling • Overview of successful approaches of prosodic modeling • Applications of prosodic modeling • Summarization of a few applications using the framework • Questions

  3. Prosody and Speech Recognition • Linguistic prosody • “use of suprasegmental features to convey sentence-level pragmatic meanings”, Ladd(1996) • Functions of prosody • Marks discourse structure or functions • Saliency • Conveys affective and emotional meaning.

  4. Prosody and Speech Recognition (cont.) • Prosodic aspects important to speech recognition • Prosodic Structure • Prosodic Prominence • Tune • Reasons for Using Prosodic Features • Additional knowledge • May help in overcoming word recognition errors • Most plausible prosody problems can be statistically classified.

  5. Approaches to Prosodic Modeling • Probabilistic Framework • P(S|F) where S represents a target class in some linguistic unit (U) and F represents a set of feature to help predict S. • P(S|W,F) where W represents the information contained in a word sequence associated with U. • Direct Modeling of Target Classes • Dependence between prosodic features and target classes modeled directly in a statistical classifier. • No use of intermediate phonological categories • Hand annotation not needed

  6. Approaches to Prosodic Modeling (cont.) • Prosodic Features • Features extracted from forced alignment(phone-level) of transcripts • Features include: pause duration, measures of lengthening, speaking rate. • Postprocessing regularizes pitch-based features. • Prosodic Models • Decision trees used as classifiers • Problems associated with decision trees • Greediness • Highly skewed class sizes

  7. Approaches to Prosodic Modeling (cont.) • Lexical Models • Target classes derived by lexical and prosodic information. • Uses statistical models from speech recognition • P(S|W) used to predict possible classes • Model combination • Posterior interpolation-compute P(S|F,W) via the Prosodic model and P(S|W) via the language model informed in many are a combination of the two. • Posteriors as features-compute P(S|W) and use the language model posterior estimates as an additional feature in the present prosodic classifier. • HMM-based integration-compute the likelihoods P(F|S,W) from the prosody model and use them as observation likelihoods in a hidden Markov model derived from the language model.

  8. Applications • Sentence segmentation and disfluency detection • Topic segmentation in Broadcast News

  9. Applications • Dialog act labeling in conversational speech • Word recognition in Conversation speech • Not optimized for speech recognition. • Have had some success, but still far from perfect.

  10. Readings • Primary: “Prosody Modeling for Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding”, Shriberg and Stolcke, 2002 • Secondary: "Turn-taking cues in task-oriented dialogue". Gravano & Hirschberg,2011 • Secondary: “ Prosody-Based Automatic Detection of Annoyance and Frustration in Human-Computer Dialog”. Ang et al., 2002. • Additional Source: “Speech and Language Processing”, Daniel Jurasky & James H. Martin, 2008, pp. 262-269.

  11. Questions?

More Related