1 / 9

Group Discussion Evaluation

Group Discussion Evaluation. By Kathie P. Simmons, RN, BSN Kwame Opoku-Agyemang, RN, BSN. GROUP DISCUSSION EVALUATION. Describes how to evaluate effectiveness of strategy Does method help achieve stated objectives Is learning activity accessible to the target

inoke
Télécharger la présentation

Group Discussion Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group Discussion Evaluation By • Kathie P. Simmons, RN, BSN • Kwame Opoku-Agyemang, RN, BSN

  2. GROUP DISCUSSION EVALUATION • Describes how to evaluate effectiveness of strategy • Does method help achieve stated objectives • Is learning activity accessible to the target group of learners (Bastable, 2008).

  3. GROUP DISCUSSION EVALUATION • Scrutinizes efficiency of - method given - time used - energy expended - resources available - cost-effectiveness (Bastable, 2008).

  4. GROUP DISCUSSION EVALUATION • Analyzes which method allows for active, participation to: • -accommodate needs • -abilities • -learner style • (Bastable, 2008).

  5. GROUP DISCUSSION SUMMARY • The action will be fruitless if the planning is devoid of: • the learners’ characteristics • behavioral objectives • teacher characteristics • resources available to the institution (Bastable, 2008)

  6. GROUP DISCUSSION SUMMARY • Group becomes more cohesive: • -trust & support typically build -naturally quiet members are willing to engage in interaction without fear of being misunderstood • (Watson, Michaelsen & Sharp 1991)

  7. GROUP DISCUSSION SUMMARY • Inherent benefits as a tool for both affective & cognitive domains • Shyness, overwhelming dominant members & high group diversity are identified as shortcomings unique to this method. (Bastable, 2008).

  8. GROUP DISCUSSION SUMMARY • Learners may need to be tactfully redirected in a manner that lessens their influence on the group without damaging the trust of other group members • (Bastable, 2008).

  9. References Abruzzeses, R. (1996). Nursing staff development: Strategies for success (2nd ed.) St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book. Bastable, S. (2008). Nurse as educator: Principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett. Boyd, M., Gleit, C., Graham, B. & Whitman, N. (1998). Health teaching in nursing practice: A professional model (3rd ed.) Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange DeYoung, S. (2003). Teaching strategies for nurse educators. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Watson, W. E., Michealsen, L. K. & Sharp, W. (1991) Member competence, group interaction and group decision making longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 801-809 Peters, F. & Connell, K. (1991). “Incorporating the affective component into an AIDS work shop.” Journal of Continuing Educations in Nursing, 22, 95-99.

More Related