1 / 6

Alternative Project Delivery Methods

Alternative Project Delivery Methods. School Site 33. Michael E Finn CFO. Options for Delivery. Construction Manager at Risk (CMR) Contractor and architect are selected separately District currently has approved architects for project

irene-horton
Télécharger la présentation

Alternative Project Delivery Methods

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Alternative Project Delivery Methods • School Site 33 Michael E Finn CFO

  2. Options for Delivery • Construction Manager at Risk (CMR) • Contractor and architect are selected separately • District currently has approved architects for project • District does not currently have approved general contractors for CMR • General contractor works with District and architect to establish Greatest Maximum Price (GMP) • Contractor is responsible if project exceeds GMP

  3. Options for Delivery • Design Build • Architect and general contractor are selected as a package • Would require procurement process • Fees are paid to firms with unsuccessful bids • Not less than .002 of the final project budget • Contractor is responsible if project exceeds GMP

  4. Comparison of Methods • Design Build opens design up for more input and control from the District regarding design and a greater list of architects to submit for work • Could prove to be more time consuming • Less control regarding subcontractors • District has not built a school under “design build” • CMR would limit to 5 existing architect firms • Prototypes ready to build would be requested • One is already completed • More control over subcontractors • District is experienced with CMR method

  5. Timeline for June 2014 delivery • Plans delivered to the City by June 1 2013 • Permits issued from the City by September 1 2013 • Ground breaking September 2013 • Construction complete July 2014 • Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment complete August 2014

  6. Questions

More Related