230 likes | 365 Vues
Shaobin Guo 11/20/2012. various types of Single-molecule force spectroscopy. Optical tweezers Magnetic tweezers Atomic force microscopy (AFM) Micro-needle manipulation Biomembrane force probe Flow-induced stretching. Single-molecule manipulation capacity.
E N D
Shaobin Guo • 11/20/2012
various types of Single-molecule force spectroscopy • Optical tweezers • Magnetic tweezers • Atomic force microscopy (AFM) • Micro-needle manipulation • Biomembrane force probe • Flow-induced stretching
Single-molecule manipulation capacity • Length: 10-10 - 10-4 m / measurement of RNA polymerase advancing a single base pair to manipulation of cells • Force: 10-14 - 10-8 Newton / assaying nucleic acid folding kinetics to mechanical disruption of covalent bonds
Optical tweezers (Trap) • Lasers: near-infrared wavelengths (800-1100 nm) • High numerical aperture (NA) microscope objective (at least 1.2) • An approximate linear spring for small displacements (~150 nm) • Position detection: back-focal plane (BFP) interferometry • Calibration: position detector and trap stiffness
Infrared laser silica bead kinesin molecule microtubule Infrared laser RNA polymerase molecule Infrared laser applications Interaction assay Tethered assay Dumbbell assay
Limitations and Drawbacks • Require optically homogeneous preparations and highly purified samples for high resolution trapping. • Lack selectivity and exclusivity • Local heating • Optical damage • Limited range of applied force (0.1-100 pN) and range of displacement (~150 nm or less)
magnetic tweezers • A pair of permanent magnets • Inverted microscope with a charge-coupled device (CCD) • Able to rotate super-paramagnetic beads ranging from 0.5 to 5 um • Force-clamp property: an effective stiffness on the order of 10-6 pN/nm • Free from sample heating, photodamage and other problems related to optical tweezers • Drawbacks: not versatile, unable to directly measure rotational torque generation, limited to slow and large displacements
Electromagnetic tweezers • Sharp electromagnetic tips • Able to exert forces in excess of 1 nN • Easy to control force and rotation by changing current • Three-dimensional position control • Drawbacks: cumbersome feedback control, sophisticated pole pieces, lack of sensitivity and heating.
Atomic Force microscopy (AFM) • A very high-resolution type of scanning probe microscopy, with demonstrated sub-nm resolution • Able to measure inter- and intramolecular interaction forces with pN resolution • Simple and rapid sample preparation, and the ability to conduct measurements under near-physiological conditions
applications • Study of molecular bond’s rupture: covalent bonds to protein unfolding • Force-clamp spectroscopy by AFM • Investigation of supramolecular assemblies • Combination of AFM imaging with force mapping and spectroscopy to image the surface topology at high resolution and measure the unbinding or unfolding forces at well-defined locations. • High-speed AFM which makes it possible to follow molecular events in real time.
Limitations and Drawbacks • Narrow useful force range resulting from large size and relative high stiffness of the cantilevers • Lack of specificity
Background • Regiospecific thiol-disulfide exchange reactions: electrons are reshuffled between a thiolate and a disulfide bond via an SN2 mechanism that produces a different disulfide and a new thiolate
problems with bulk techniques • Inability to differentiate disulfide isomers • Variations among different techniques used to analyze reactions and subsequent divergent interpretations • Interference from the reverse reaction
Cantilever Tip Piezoelectric scanner experiment set-up Force: 250 pN
14.5 nm 10 nm Reduction events from polypeptides containing single disulfide bond (I2732–75)8 (I2724–55)8 Predicted extension after the reduction of a disulfide bond
Reduction events from polypeptides containing two disulfide bonds (I272S-S)4
Pathways available for the reduction of disulfide 24–55 after the reduction of disulfide 32–75
At high concentrations of L-Cys the frequency of the 10 nm steps increases at the expense of the 3 and 8nm steps