1 / 21

How do humans make a living?

How do humans make a living?. Part I: Hunter Gatherers February 16, 2005. “Primitives”. Hobbes: “Nasty, brutish and short” Rousseau: “Noble savage” Anthropologists avoid: Primitive, advanced, savage, stages, tribes. Teleological Models. Great Chain of Being God Angels

issac
Télécharger la présentation

How do humans make a living?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How do humans make a living? Part I: Hunter Gatherers February 16, 2005

  2. “Primitives” • Hobbes: “Nasty, brutish and short” • Rousseau: “Noble savage” • Anthropologists avoid: • Primitive, advanced, savage, stages, tribes

  3. Teleological Models • Great Chain of Being • God • Angels • Humans (Culture) • Mammals • Other animals • Plants (Nature) • Rocks • Dirt

  4. Teleological Models • Colonial explorers categorized people in the same way: • Light skinned, upper class Europeans • Poor (ethnic) Europeans (Slavs, Mediterraneans) • Dark skinned farmers • Dark Skinned hunter gatherers • Great apes

  5. Stages of Culture • Edward Tyler: Primitive Culture (1871) • Civilization (Present) • Barbarism • Savagery (Distant past)

  6. Category Civilization Upper Barbarism Middle Barbarism Lower Barbarism Upper Savagery Middle Savagery Lower Savagery Technology Alphabet, writing Iron tools Farming, herding Pottery Bow and Arrow Fishing, Foraging No technology Technology

  7. Cultural Evolutionism • State • Chiefdom • Tribe • Band • Increasing social complexity • Based on political/social/economic characteristics

  8. Bands • Hunter-gatherers • Small, less than 100 individuals • Linked by kinship and marriage • Size may fluctuate • Egalitarian

  9. Tribes • Some agriculture • At least one more powerful leader • Headman

  10. Chiefdoms • At least 2 social classes • Elite ruling class • Common class

  11. States • Intense food production • Multiple social classes • Bureaucracy • Complex social organization

  12. Why not teleology? • Implies that some people don’t have history (living relics, etc.) • Change is not always unilinear • Assumes that “primitive” people are isolated from modern world

  13. Human Ecology • Subsistence strategy as behavioral adaptation • Making a living in the easiest way in a given environment • Modern foragers may be analogous to ancient foragers (human ancestors)

  14. Foraging Diversity

  15. Foraging Diversity • Environments • Workload • Division of Labor • Political organization • Histories

  16. Tenrecs Tubers Corn Wage Labor Hybrid system of foraging and cultivation Mikea

  17. Optimal Foraging Theory • Resource value=energy value -handling cost (Calories) • Reasons for not following model: • Show off factor • Nutrients, not just Calories

  18. Conservation? • If foragers were conservationists, they would kill only adult male animals. • If not, they would exploit resources following optimal foraging theory.

  19. Exchange • Redistribution • Reciprocity • Generalized • Balanced • Negative • Markets

  20. Potlatch • Huge feasts of redistribution • Brings prestige for Organizer • Wasteful? • Cultural Ecology Interpretation

  21. What can Archaeology Tell Us?

More Related