1 / 9

EDIS The final phase Martin BECK (martin.beck@cec.eut) DG Regional Policy

EDIS The final phase Martin BECK (martin.beck@cec.eu.int) DG Regional Policy Unit G6: Audit of ERDF and ISPA. Four Phases EDIS. 1: Gap Assessment 2: Gap plugging 3: Compliance assessment 4: Preparation Commission Decision. Current state of play (1). Phase 1 completed:

jaden
Télécharger la présentation

EDIS The final phase Martin BECK (martin.beck@cec.eut) DG Regional Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EDIS The final phase Martin BECK (martin.beck@cec.eu.int) DG Regional Policy Unit G6: Audit of ERDF and ISPA Brussels, 9 April 2003

  2. Four Phases EDIS • 1: Gap Assessment • 2: Gap plugging • 3: Compliance assessment • 4: Preparation Commission Decision Brussels, 9 April 2003

  3. Current state of play (1) • Phase 1 completed: • Czech Republic: • Deloitte & Touche • Estonia: • Deloitte & Touche • Hungary: • Government Control Office • Latvia: • Price, Waterhouse & Coopers • Lithuania: • Ernst & Young • Slovakia: • P.E. International • Slovenia: • Ministry of Finance • Romania • Price, Waterhouse & Coopers • Poland • Ernst & Young Brussels, 9 April 2003

  4. Current state of play (2) • Phase 2 & 3 completed: • Estonia: • Price, Waterhouse & Coopers (Phase 2) • Deloitte & Touche (Phase 3) • Phase 4 running • Estonia • Commission services • Contract auditor Phase 2 signed: • Hungary • P.E. International • Lithuania • Deloitte & Touche • Updated information available on: • http://forum.europa.eu.int/Members/irc/budg/fccweb02/ (Financial Control Contact website) Brussels, 9 April 2003

  5. Conflict of interests • Same auditor can carry out Phase 1 & 3 audit • Auditor Phase 2 cannot carry out Phase 1 & 3 audit • Phase 4 auditor: Commission services • External firms may be called on by Commission to provide assistance • These auditors not involved in previous stages Brussels, 9 April 2003

  6. Scope Phase 4 audit • Assessment of: • national and sectoral project management capacity • financial control procedures • structures regarding public finance • Target bodies: • NIC • NAO and National Fund • SAO and supporting staff • implementing agencies • internal audit bodies • bodies responsible for the ex-ante control on tendering and contracting Brussels, 9 April 2003

  7. Request file • Elements • NAO confirming fulfilment of conditions • Compliance Assessment Report • positive assurance external auditor • EDIS request complete and accurate • non-blocking findings, requiring action within a fixed time-scale • Audit trails • payments to contractors • claiming funds from EU • reporting system (Monitoring Committee, irregularities, final report) • supporting documentation • Updated ISPA implementation paper • Other useful documents (e.g. Manuals) Brussels, 9 April 2003

  8. Steps Phase 4 (1) • Consultation of other services • DG BUDG, MARKT, ELARG, AGRI • Directorate F • EC Delegation • Preparation of the audit • Analysis of request file • Analysis of earlier audit work • Info from ECD on procurement • On-the-spot audit • Joint methodology DG REGIO/ELARG • More oriented on testing system • Using COSO approach • More info: presentation Berrisford 13.11.2002 Brussels, 9 April 2003

  9. Steps Phase 4 (2) • Drafting audit report • Findings • weaknesses serious enough to block EDIS • recommended corrective actions with timetable but not blocking EDIS • possible corrective actions without any timetable • no comments required • Discussion with and submission to manager ISPA: Directorate F • Granting EDIS or not to be decided by DG REGIO • Decision can vary per implementing agency • Opinion of the auditors Brussels, 9 April 2003

More Related