1 / 14

G-Hope

G-Hope. Alex Mills, Hendra Sutedja , Himanshu Prabhakar , Karthik Rajendra Babu , Keyur Patankar , Rameela Asad , Reeti Das, Sayali Pathak , Sheetal Panchal , Shriram Venkatraman , Sonia Sharma. Presentation Agenda. Problem Definition Definitions System Overview Demo Goal Domain

jaeger
Télécharger la présentation

G-Hope

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. G-Hope Alex Mills, HendraSutedja, HimanshuPrabhakar, KarthikRajendraBabu, KeyurPatankar, RameelaAsad, Reeti Das, SayaliPathak, SheetalPanchal, ShriramVenkatraman, Sonia Sharma

  2. Presentation Agenda • Problem Definition • Definitions • System Overview • Demo • Goal • Domain • Functional Requirements • Non-Functional Requirements • Traceability • Scope Creep Tolerance

  3. Introduction • Why we’re doing this system… • What sort of communication problems? • Memory Loss • Hard-of-hearing • Difficulty speaking • Accommodating other age-related disabilities • Visual impairment • Must assume user is capable of operating a smart phone.

  4. Problem Definition World as it is (AS-IS) World as it would be (TO-BE) • Difficult to understand what people say. • Difficult to be understood. • Forget people’s names. • Emergency situations become extremely dangerous. • People would have a new method for understanding and being understood. • People can be easily identified using a familiar interface. • Calls to emergency services can be automatically handled, if desired.

  5. Definitions • Categories: • Consists of multi-dimensional vocabulary items • Can be either activity or item based. • Sentences: • Part of categories. • Can be opinion or greetings which elderly wants to express.

  6. Goal • Our main goal is to create an application for assisting elderly people with communication difficulties. • the Android Platform • Helps people with communication difficulties (i.e. speaking, vision and memory loss) • Should be easy to use. • Should provide communication assistance during emergencies.

  7. Domain • Definition of Elderly – extended to not just elderly, but anyone with communication difficulties. • Ease of Placing Emergency Calls – Automated messages for 911 emergencies. • Mode of communication – Sentences are verbalized and displayed along with a picture.

  8. Functional Requirements • Category/Sub-category selection. • Categories easily displayed in grid and accessed using touch interface. • Frequently used categories and sentences displayed first. • Text/Voice search. • Automated messages for 911 • Verbalized category selection.

  9. Non Functional Requirements • Usability: • Configurable icon size and text size • Emergency functionality availability on the home screen • Understandability: Help availability on all screens with a single touch • Performance: 0.5 second response time on every action • Extensibility: Easy to extend to accommodate new features

  10. Non Functional Requirements • User can configure any category/subcategory, sentence, image. (add, modify, delete) • Multiple sentences for each bottom-level icon. • Maximum navigation depth of 3-4 screens • Breadcrumb interface to easily backtrack categories.

  11. DEMO

  12. Traceability From the Preliminary Definition document, every functional and non functional aspect of the application has been operationalized and assigned a number. • Functional Requirements are numbered as FR###. • Non Functional Requirements are numbered as NFR###. Further Traceability matrix have columns for Unit Test Case No. and Integration Test Case No., which will be filled in while compiling the Testing Documents.

  13. Scope Creep Tolerance • Can accommodate approximately 15% change. • Easy to accommodate: • Changes to the user interface • “Tweaks” of existing features • Minor additions to functional requirements • Difficult to accommodate: • Changes to the problem or goal • Major changes in the domain requirements • Major additions to functional requirements

  14. Justification • Configurability • Ease of use • Touch based input • Help Availability • Maximum navigation depth of 3-4 clicks • Easy to read, view icons • Prioritized accessibility of critical functions • Helps not only elderly, anyone with communication difficulties • Communication is as accurate as possible because of customizability of sentences and categories • Android Platform • One Month Money Back Guarantee.

More Related