1 / 26

The Linkage of Research and School Finance Policy

The Linkage of Research and School Finance Policy. Eric Hanushek Alfred Lindseth. Overview of Issues. Increased demands for linking policy to rigorous research NCLB IES and this conference Range of policies Specific, programmatic policies

jamese
Télécharger la présentation

The Linkage of Research and School Finance Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Linkage of Research and School Finance Policy Eric Hanushek Alfred Lindseth

  2. Overview of Issues • Increased demands for linking policy to rigorous research • NCLB • IES and this conference • Range of policies • Specific, programmatic policies • Reading First, class size reduction, after school programs • General institutional policies • Funding, certification, salary policies, accountability

  3. Institutional policies • Assertion: More leverage in institutional than programmatic policies • Much less knowledge about institutional • Limited analysis of past policies • Missing information on key “design” parameters • Requires different approaches

  4. Discussion Plan • Use finance issues to illustrate concerns • Evaluate major court-ordered “equity” and “adequacy” financing changes • Link performance-based funding to research • Schoolhouses, Courthouses, and Statehouses

  5. Existing Institutional Research: Equity Analysis • Court cases flowing from Seranno v. Priest • Individual state: • Downes (1992) [California]; Flanagan and Murray (2004) [Kentucky]; Downes (2004) [Vermont]; Cullen and Loeb (2004) [Michigan]; Duncombe and Johnston (2004) [Kansas] • National: • Hanushek and Somers (2001); Greene and Trivitt (2008)

  6. Existing Institutional Research: Adequacy Analysis

  7. Kentucky and National NAEP Trends for White Students, 1992 to 2007

  8. Kentucky and National NAEP Trends for Black Students, 1992 to 2007

  9. New Jersey and National NAEP Trends for Black Students, 1992 to 2007

  10. New Jersey and National NAEP Trends for Black Students, 4th grade reading, 1992 to 2007

  11. New Jersey and National NAEP Trends for Hispanic Students, 1992 to 2007

  12. Wyoming and National NAEP Trends for White Students, 1992 to 2007

  13. Wyoming and National NAEP Trends for Hispanic Students, 1992 to 2007

  14. Massachusetts and National NAEP Trends for White Students, 1992 to 2007

  15. Massachusetts and National NAEP Trends for Black Students, 1992 to 2007

  16. Performance-Based Funding • Cannot separate financing from policy • Must get incentives right • Cannot do piecemeal policies

  17. Performance-Based Funding • 1. Standards, Assessment, and Accountability • 2. Empower Local Decision Making • 3. Direct Rewards and Incentives • 4. Information, Evaluation, and Continuous Improvement • 5. Rational and Equitable Funding

  18. 1. Standards, Assessment, and Accountability

  19. 2. Empower Local Decision Making

  20. 3. Direct Rewards and Incentives

  21. 4. Information, Evaluation, and Continuous Improvement

  22. 5. Rational and Equitable Funding

  23. Performance-Based Funding • 1. Standards, Assessment, and Accountability • 2. Empower Local Decision Making • 3. Direct Rewards and Incentives • 4. Information, Evaluation, and Continuous Improvement • 5. Rational and Equitable Funding

  24. Performance-Based Funding • 1. Standards, Assessment, and Accountability • 2. Empower Local Decision Making • 3. Direct Rewards and Incentives • 4. Information, Evaluation, and Continuous Improvement • 5. Rational and Equitable Funding

More Related