Download
slide1 n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

94 Vues Download Presentation
Télécharger la présentation

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG4h Closing Report for May 2010 Session] Date Submitted: [17 May 2010] Source: [Patrick Kinney] Company [Kinney Consulting LLC] Address [Chicago area, IL, USA] Voice:[+1.847.960.3715], E-Mail:[pat.kinney@ieee.org] Re: [TG4h Closing Report for May 2010 Session.] Abstract:[Closing Report for the TG4h Session in May] Purpose:[Corrigenda to IEEE 802.15.4] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. <Pat Kinney>, <Kinney Consulting LLC>

  2. TG4h PAR Scope of Proposed Standard This corrigendum contains substantive corrections to IEEE Std 802.15.4. It corrects errors, inconsistencies, and ambiguities in that standard. It does not contain new material. Slide 2 <Pat Kinney>, <Kinney Consulting LLC>

  3. Purpose of Proposed Standard Slide 3 <Pat Kinney>, <Kinney Consulting LLC>

  4. Meeting Goals • Review results from Letter Ballot 52 • Review comments from Letter Ballot 52 • Form ballot resolution teams • Categorize comments as per ballot resolution team • Start comment resolution effort Slide 4 <Pat Kinney>, <Kinney Consulting LLC>

  5. TG4h Meetings This Week Slide 5 <Pat Kinney>, <Kinney Consulting LLC>

  6. LB52 Results • Responses: 185 (82.6% of 224) • Approve: 160 (95.8%) • Disapprove: 7 • Abstain: 18 • Comments: 111 (E-46, T-65) <Pat Kinney>, <Kinney Consulting LLC>

  7. Technical Editing Path Forward • Assign comment resolution team leads • Categorize comments as per teams • Review comments and sort into categories • More information from commenter needed • Out of scope • Resolution is straightforward without contention • Comment is conflicting or resolution could be considered contentious • Send out emails to commenters requesting additional information • If no response within ~1-2 week(s), comment will be rejected • Comment resolution team to work on non-contentious comments • Those comments with high potential for conflict should be scheduled for a face-face meeting <Pat Kinney>, <Kinney Consulting LLC>