130 likes | 200 Vues
Explore the historical significance and modern relevance of the Cavendish Experiment in measuring the gravitational constant G. Learn about the apparatus, methods, data analysis, and importance of this fundamental constant in astrophysics and planetary calculations. Discover the experimental setup, motivation, and results, including insights into the precision and accuracy of determining G. Gain a deeper understanding of the forces at play and the impact of this experiment in the scientific community.
E N D
The Cavendish Experiment A Direct Measurement of The Gravitational Constant G Advanced Lab 2, Fall 2008 Joe Mitchell Brian Reed Johnny Sharp Leah Trafford
The Cavendish Experiment: Outline • Motivation • The Importance of The Gravitational Constant G • History • The Cavendish Apparatus and Measurement • Apparatus • Taking Measurements • Brief Description of Forces • Method 1: Equilibrium Positions • Theory and Procedure • Analyzed Data • Method 2: Constant Acceleration • Theory and Procedure • Show analyzed data • Demo • Summary Henry Cavendish Experimental Setup
Motivation University of Washington Big G Measurement • G determines the strength of gravitational force between two objects • Fundamental constant of nature • G is important in astrophysics and most any calculation involving gravity • Needed to determine the mass of the Earth and other planets and stars • Measurement of G still an active field • Striving to increase accuracy • Many current experiments to investigate the behavior of G http://lheawww.gsfc.nasa.gov/~merk/G/apparatus.JPG
Cavendish History Cavendish’s Experimental Setup Cavendish at Work • Cavendish’s results not improved until 100 years later • Density of earth first approximated by Newton using the density of rocks • Performed in 1797-1798 by Henry Cavendish • Intent of the experiment was to measure the density of the earth • “G” and the mass of the earth were derived by others after Cavendish’s death • Boys’ 1894 paper “On the Newtonian Constant of Gravitation”, introduced G
The Torsion Wire • A torsion wire acts very much like a spring • The torsion of the wire is equal to the twist in the wire
Apparatus: Inside and Outside the Box masses laser position after one period equilibrium position mirror Amplitude laser
Apparatus: Thinking of Forces Gravity and Torsion are equal and opposite Gravity and Torsionare equal and opposite Original Position: System is in equilibrium Final Position: System is in Equilibrium • Both forces are responsible for the acceleration that the small balls feel when the equilibrium positions are disturbed • Both forces are responsible for the final equilibrium position
Method 1: Equilibrium Position • Measure difference on screen ∆S between equilibrium positions • Equilibrium positions: States where lead balls are not moving • Measurement gives angular displacement between equilibrium positions • Combine with a measurement of the period to obtain G Actual Data
Method 1: Measurement of ∆S S1 ∆S =0.115 m S2 T= 395 s G = 6.9 ± 0.4 x10-11m3kg-1s-2- 4% deviation from accepted value
Method 2: Using Acceleration Gravity and Torsionare equal and opposite Gravity and Torsion are in the same direction Balls are moved: G can be described in terms of the initial acceleration felt by the small masses • Procedure: • Start with large balls in equilibrium position • Record Position • Flip large balls to final position • Record position every 15 seconds for approx. 45 seconds
Method 2: Measurement of a0 ΔX (m) This method gave the following value of G: G = 6.6 ± 0.8 X 10-11 m3kg-1s-2 - 1% deviation from the accepted value
Summary • G is the fundamental constant with the greatest uncertainty so accurate measurements of it are still important • The search for G began with Cavendish, using a similar method to the one we are implementing • This method uses a torsion balance to measure the gravitational interaction between small spherical weights • To analyze the data and calculate G we used two methods • The equilibrium method: measure the difference in angle of the equilibrium positions • This yields an accuracy of about 5% • The acceleration method: measure the initial acceleration of the masses and the period of oscillation • This yields an accuracy of about 15%