1 / 40

Resources

2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment 972-348-1480 Jana.Schreiner@Region10.org. Resources. http:// ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/index.html www.lead4ward.com www.region10.org/accountability.

jered
Télécharger la présentation

Resources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2014 Accountability System2014AccountabilitySystemJana SchreinerSenior Consultant Accountability State Assessment972-348-1480Jana.Schreiner@Region10.org

  2. Resources http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/index.html www.lead4ward.com www.region10.org/accountability

  3. 5th and 8th Reading and Math

  4. Agenda • Overview Accountability System • Ratings • Safeguards • Distinctions

  5. 2014 Ratings Labels Rating based on 4 Indexes

  6. Performance Index Framework Rating based on 4 Performance Indexes

  7. Performance Standards on STAAR Unknown Could Change Dec. 2014

  8. 2014 Target= 55

  9. Index 1: Student Achievement Index 1: Student Achievement provides an overview of student performance based on satisfactory student achievement across all subjects for all students. • 2014 • Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. • Student Groups: All Students. • Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II (Satisfactory). • STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments (5 total): • English l; English ll • Algebra l • Biology • US History • English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests): • ELLs in US schools Year 1 excluded • ELLs in US schools Year 2 and beyond included • 2013 • Combined over All Subjects: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. • Student Groups: All Students. • Performance Standards: Phase-in 1 Level II (Satisfactory). • STAAR End-of-Course (EOC) Assessments(15 total): • Reading I; Reading II; Reading III • Writing I; Writing II; Writing III • Algebra l; Geometry; Algebra ll • Biology; Chemistry; Physics • World Geography; World History; US History • English Language Learners (English and Spanish tests): • ELLs in US schools Years 1-3 excluded • ELLs in US schools Year 4 or more included

  10. Index 1: Student Achievement • English I and II from Spring 2014 + • Include Reading I and II from July 2013 and December 2013 • Substitute Assessments EOCs (PSAT, PLAN, SAT, ACT, AP) • Standard at Meeting Final Level II (CCR Standard) • Counted as PASSER for Index I • Counted as Meeting CCR Standard for Index IV • Not used in Index 2 and 3

  11. Add STAAR M, STAAR ALT, ELL progress measure

  12. Index 2: Student Progress • Progress Measures by Subject Area and School Type

  13. Index 2: Student Progress Index 2: 2013 Construction – Table 1

  14. Index 2: Student Progress Index 2: 2013 Construction – Table 2

  15. Index 2: Student Progress • Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners. • By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics • One point for Metprogress level • Two points for Exceededprogress level • Progress Measures by Subject Area and School Type • New for 2014: • No Index 2 for High Schools (9-12 campuses) or AEA • Inclusion STAAR-Modified, STAAR-Alt • Inclusion of ELL Students

  16. Index 2: Student Progress • Index 2: Student Progress focuses on actual student growth independent of overall achievement levels for each race/ethnicity student group, students with disabilities, and English language learners. • New for 2014: • Students who skip grades included • Students who transition from Spanish to English in mathematics included • 3rd grade student who receive ELL progress measure will count • ELL Denials: Students whose parent(s) have denied ELL services included • Considered as Non-ELL student for Index 2

  17. Where can I find info? • Campus rosters • Student have either STAAR Progress or ELL Progress

  18. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps emphasizes advanced academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the two lowest performing race/ethnicity student groups. • 2013 • Pointsbased on STAAR performance: • Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests MET Phase-in 1 Level II • By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. • Student Groups: • Economically Disadvantaged • Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity from 2012 • 2014 • Pointsbased on STAAR performance: • Phase-in 1 Level II satisfactory performance: One point for each percent of tests MET Phase-in 1 Level II • Level III advanced performance:Two points for each percent of tests at the Level III advanced performance standard. • By Subject Area: Reading, Mathematics, Writing, Science, and Social Studies. • Student Groups: • Economically Disadvantaged • Lowest Performing Race/Ethnicity from 2013…groups must have 25 tests in reading AND math • Inclusion of ELL Students

  19. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3: 2014 Construction – Table 1 (based on 2014 STAAR performance)

  20. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Index 3: 2014 Construction – Table 2(based on 2014 assessment results by subject area)

  21. For Discussion…… • ELL http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2014/index.html

  22. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the importance of earning a high school diploma that provides students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military; and the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for high school. 2014 • Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation and dropout rates for: • Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups; or • Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index. • RHSP/DAP Graduates: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups. • STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll for All Students and race/ethnicity student groups. Additional Indicators Required by House Bill 5 (83rd Texas Legislature, 2013) • College Ready Graduates. 2013 • Graduation Score: Combined performance across the graduation and dropout rates for: • Grade 9-12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups; or • Grade 9-12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for All Students and all student groups, whichever contributes the higher number of points to the index. • RHSP/DAP Graduates: All Students and race/ethnicity student groups.

  23. Definition: Page 8, TAPR glossary Rate: Page 7, campus TAPR… “both subjects”

  24. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness

  25. Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness • STAAR Level II Final Performance • Percent Met Final Level II on Two or More Assessments • Weighting of Indicators: ALL FOUR components • Post-Secondary Indicator: • Percent Met Criteria on ELA AND MATH

  26. Index 4 Targets STAAR Component All four components • Elementary-12 • Middle School-13 • High School- 18 21(changed as of April 25th posting)* • District--13 • Districts, high schools, and multi-grade campuses-56 57 (changed as of April 25th posting)*

  27. 55% 5th percentile 5th percentile

  28. Rating Labels: AEA 2014 System Standard accountability labels: Met Alternative Standard Improvement Required 30% NA 5th percentile

  29. Distinction Designations • 2013 Distinction Designation • Campus Top Twenty-Five Percent: • Campuses in the top quartile of their campus comparison • group earn a distinction designation. • Student Progress • based on Index 2 • Academic Achievement in: • Reading/ELA • Mathematics • 2014 Distinction Designation • Campus Top Twenty-Five Percent: • Campuses in the top quartile of their campus comparison group • Student Progress (based on Index 2) • Closing Performance Gaps (based on Index 3) • Academic Achievement in: • Reading/English Language Arts • Mathematics • Science • Social Studies • Districts and Campuses Postsecondary Readiness: • House Bill 5 (83rd Texas Legislature, 2013) expanded distinctions • for districts and campuses for attainment of postsecondary readiness • Criteria must include indicators based on percentages of students who: • Achieve college-readiness standards on STAAR; • Earn nationally/internationally recognized business/industry certification; • Complete a coherent sequence of CTE courses; • Complete dual credit or a postsecondary course for local credit; • Achieve college readiness standards on SAT, ACT, PSAT, or ACT-PLAN; • Earn college credit based on AP/IB performance.

  30. Accountability Ratings and Distinction Designations

  31. System Safeguards Safeguard Measures and Targets: • Reporting system disaggregates performance by student group, performance level, and subject area. • Performance rates arecalculatedfrom the assessment results used to calculate Index 1: Student Achievement. • 2013 targets for the disaggregated system-safeguard results: • STAAR performance target corresponds to Index 1 (50%); • STAAR participation target required by federal accountability(95%); • Federal graduation rate targets and improvement calculations for 4-year rate (78%) and 5-year rate (83%); and • Federal limit on use of alternate assessments (1% and 2%).

  32. 2014 Accountability System Safeguard Measures and Targets * Targets for 2014 correspond to the performance target for Index 1: Student Achievement. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting

More Related