1 / 18

Morphology

Morphology . Language & Mind Summer 2011. Words . Perhaps the most conspicuous, most easily extractable aspect of language. Cf. phone, phoneme, syllable

jerica
Télécharger la présentation

Morphology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Morphology Language & Mind Summer 2011

  2. Words • Perhaps the most conspicuous, most easily extractable aspect of language. • Cf. phone, phoneme, syllable • NB word vis a visspeech stream (a la figure-groundin cognition), i.e. word’s are prominent are thus given primacy in common considerations of language; they’re also exalted (in religion, as well as in academia). • Words are minimal free forms: independent from others in sentence; + no smaller bit has such freedom.

  3. The structure of words • Simple words • Have no internal structure • Farm, kill, duck • Complex words • Can be divided into smaller pieces AKA morphemes • Farmer, kills, duckling • English complex words are made up of relatively few morphemes. Cf. Yu’pik: kai-pia-llru-llini-u-k (‘the two of them were apparently really hungry’)

  4. Morphemes & allomorphs • Morphemes • The smallest meaningful linguistic unit • Allomorphs • One of the alternative phonemic forms of a morpheme. • The prefix ‘in-’ has 4 allomorphs • 3rd person sg present tense: kills, pats, touches • Indefinite article: a,an

  5. Allomorphs • ‘allos’ don’t contrast (allo- = Greek for ‘other’) • Complementary distribution • a & an • Cf. /p/ at beginning vs. end of word • Free variation • Cf. alternate realizations of ‘exit’ and ‘off’ • However, cf. ‘exist’ vs. ‘excel’ (near minimal pairs)

  6. Allomorphs • E.g. Plural ‘s’ and he/she/it verb+’s’ • Both have the same three phonological forms: • …resulting in 6 morphs • E.g. cap,bud,bush; fit,tag,kiss • …which form 2 sets of allomorphs • …of 2 morphemes

  7. Morpheme types: by occurrence • Free morphemes • Simple words consist of a single morpheme, and thus they are free morphemes. • ‘a potential to occur independently’ • NB not all free morphemes in sentences are words. • Bound morphemes (-er, -s, -ing, un-, re-…) • Affixes: prefixes, suffixes, infixes • A morpheme can have free & bound allomorphs: • E.g. not - …n’t ‘deride’-’derision’

  8. Morpheme types: by function • Lexical morphemes • Convey major content of message; • Open set; • Free lexical morphemes = Free roots (May serve as base for bound morphemes) • Bound: Lexical roots & Derivational affixes • Grammatical morphemes (‘function morphemes’) • Mainly give info about grammatical structure; • Closed set • Free & Bound grammatical morphemes • Bound: inflectional & clitics

  9. Lexical morphemes • Bound roots • E.g. derision, submit, receive…(Latinate, ‘academic’ words) • Derivational affixes • Attach to a lexical root and make a new word (a complex lexeme called a ‘stem’) • E.g. baker (-er), tearful (-ful), childish (-ish)… • A new meaning and (sometimes) a new part of speech are derived

  10. Grammatical morphemes • ‘function morphemes’ • Mainly give info about grammatical structure • Generally demanded by the grammar • Give abstract schematic meanings concerning the functions of lexical items • Free grammatical morphemes • Articles, pron, preps, conj, aux verbs • And, but, if, or, the, on, that… • Bound grammatical morphemes • Inflectional affixes (8: -s, -s, -s, -ed, -ing, -en, -er, -est) • They don’t change the meaning (much)

  11. Grammatical morphemes • Bound grammatical morphemes • Inflectional affixes: give grammatical info relevant to the interpretation of sentence. • Don’t give rise to new lexical words, but to diff forms of a single word, different forms appropriate for use of that word a sentence. • Serviconsulemaudiunt vs. Consul servos audit • The slaves hear the consul The consul hears the slaves • noun+ /i/ = subject-pl; n+/em/=obj-sg; …-verb+/unt/; verb+/t/

  12. Allomorphic conditioning • Types of allomorphs • Phonological allomorphs • E.g. possessive and plural ‘s’ • Suppletiveallomorphs • E.g. good, better, best; go,went,gone

  13. Allomorphic conditioning • Types of conditioning factors • Phonological conditioning • Indefinite article • Possesive • Lexical conditioning • Depends on word: irregular plural nouns, past tense : irregular plural

  14. Allomorphic conditioning • Morphological rules • Like identifying abstract phonemic forms that are realized by phones, it can be descriptively and conceptually useful to identify abstract forms for morphemes that are realized by different phonological allomorphs. • Thus the Eng. regular past suffix has 3 allomorphs, which are in complementary distribution. • We can presume they are alternative realizations of a more abstract form of the morpheme (cf. phonemes)

  15. Morphological description • Locative case in Turkish • Four allomorphs – each influenced by its phonological environment

  16. Morphological analysis • Hungarian verbs p 72 • Suppletive allomorphs • 3rdperssg – unmarked (not uncommon) • Nb zero morphs

  17. Morphological analysis by speakers • Kids learn L1 starting w/ words or larger units as unanalyzed wholes. • Each word is a separate sign, unrelated to others • By 4 yrs kids’ vocabularies = 1000+ words • i.e. ‘too many’ to treat as unique entities • Thus they divide them into meaningful parts • NB ‘regularizing’ irregular words (pl & past tense)

  18. Morphological analysis by speakers • We continue to abstract elements of words throughout adulthood, performing ad hoc analyses • At times we abstract ‘meaningless’ elements and imbue them with meaning (cf. faux etymology) • At times we abstract ‘meaningful’ elements and create new ‘valid’ words (cf. etymology  any new academic term from ‘atom’ to ‘zoophobia’ • NB: every word was made up at some point: what words are being made up now?

More Related