KEYS 2.0 TRAINING

1. KEYS 2.0 TRAINING PART THREE Training Module 5 Working with Your KEYS Data

2. Action Research Cycle Process & product evaluation including effects on student achievement NEA 6 Keys to School Quality School completesKEYS 2.0 survey Implementation of planned intervention School receives scores on KEYS 42 indicators of school quality School makes decisions about next steps and plans for improvement Use other data, including student achievement to confirm, validate or justify Make judgements based on theories or hypotheses (if, then) to explain “why” Make inferences about our school’s quality based on the KEYS results and assessments of other data Model for Understanding and Interpreting KEYS 2.0 Data

3. Histogram (Continuous Data)Salaries of School Employees 50 Salary Data By Interval 42 40 Interval # of Observations 35 No. of School Employees 0-10K 30 2 11-20K 10 26 21-30K 35 31-40K 20 42 41-50K 26 51-60K 8 10 61-70K 10 8 3 3 71-80K 1 2 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

4. Responses of Parents Regarding Causes for Non Participation in School Activities Possible Reasons Frequency % of Total Parents are Not Active 55 110 Feeling UnWelcome 17.5 Lack of Transportation 35 12.5 Lack of Information 25 7.5 Language Issues 15 5 Cultural Issues 10 2.5 Lack of Time 5 100 Total 200

5. 110 100 50 35 25 15 10 5 Feeling Unwelcome Lack of Trans. Lack of Info. Language Culture Time The Pareto Chart (Bar Graph)-- Causes For Non Participation in School Activities Frequency of Parent Responses Causes for Non Participation in School Activities

6. Making Parents Feel Welcome Fishbone Diagram with Desired Outcome Stated

7. Fishbone Diagram with Possible Interventions to Make Parents Feel More Welcome in the School Create a Parent Resource Center Provide Newsletters & Materials in Several languages Materials Funds Space Communications Making Parents Feel Welcome Modify Schedule and Procedures for Conducting Teacher/ Parent Conferences Hire a School- Community Representative

8. CREATE PARENT RESOURCE CENTER 1.0 SPACE 2.0 CURRICULUM MATERIALS 3.0 COMMUNICATIONS 4.0 SECURE FUNDS 1.1 FURNITURE 1.2 DECORATING 1.3 WIRING 1.2.1 PICTURES 1.2.2 PAINTING 1.2.3 WINDOW TREATMENT 2.1 COMPUTERS 2.2 BOOKS/ JOURNALS 2.3 COURSE WORK WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE TOP-DOWN TREE FORMAT

9. WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE Left-To-Right Format • Create Resource Center • 1.0 Space • 1.1 Furniture • 1.2 Decorating • 1.2.1 Pictures • 1.2.2 Painting • 1.2.3 Window Treatment • 2.0 Curricular Materials • 2.1 Computers • 2.2 Books/Journals • 2.3 Course work • 3.0 Communications • 4.0 Secure Funds

10. Gantt Chart* Create Parent Resource Center Tasks/Milestones Time • 1.0 Space • 1.1 Furniture • 1.2 Decorating • 1.2.1 Picture • 1.2.2 Paintings • 1.2.3 Window Treatment • Space is Ready for Use • 2.0 Curricular Materials • 2.1 Computers • 2.2 Books/Journals • 2.3 Course work • 3.0 Communications • 4.0 Secure Funds • Resource Room Open JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE *The Gantt Chart is a useful scheduling tool for a relatively simple project as the one above. For more complex projects, where it is critical to show task interdependencies, other network scheduling tools such as Performance Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) or Critical Path Method (CPM) are more appropriate.

11. Task/Responsibility Matrix Parent Resource Center PERSONS RESPONSIBLE FRANCES S. JUAN B. JOE S. (PRINCIPAL) HAROLD B. FRANK C. Tasks 1.0 Space 1.1 Furniture 1.2 Decorating 1.2.1 Pictures 1.2.2 Painting 1.2.3 Window Treatment 2.0 Curricular Materials 2.1 Computers 2.2 Books/Journals 2.3 Course Work 3.0 Communications 4.0 Secure Funds A R A I/C I/C I/C A R R R I Relationship Code R - Responsible for Work A-Approve C-Consult I-Inform

12. Start or end of process An activity that must be accomplished A decision point A product or output The arrow designates the flow

13. Start Secure Funds No Are Funds Available? Yes Plan & Carryout Communications compare Obtain Curricular Materials Prepare Space No No No Space Ready? Communications ActivitiesCarried Out? Materials Ready? Yes Yes Yes Open Resource Room FLOW DIAGRAM PARENT RESOURCE ROOM

14. Trend (Run) Chart 100 — 90 — 80 — 70 — Number of Visits by Parents to Resource Center 60 — 50 — 40 — 30 — 20 — 10 — — — — — — — — — — — Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June YEAR 2001

15. Run (Trend) ChartParent Resource Room Project Visits to Parent Resource Room — — — — — — — Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

16. Implied Relationship Parents Attend/Use School Resource Room Parents Feel More Comfortable and Welcomed Parents Become More Actively Involved in School Activities Their children learn more and Score Higher on Achievement Tests

17. • • • • • • • • • • • • Scatter Diagram Parent Resource Room Project • Children with Improved Students Achievement (Gains) Scores as Measured by Standardized Tests • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Evidence of Parental Involvement in School Activities

18. • • • • • • • • • • • • Scatter Diagram Parent Resource Room Project • Evidence of Parental Feeling of being Welcomed • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Attendance/Use of Parental Resource Room

19. • • • • • • • • • • • • Scatter Diagram Parent Resource Room Project • Evidence of Parental Involvement in School Activities • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Evidence of Parental Feelings of Welcome

20. Run (Trend) ChartParent Resource Room Project Visits to Parent Resource Room — — — — — — — Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

21. 100 — 90 — 80 — UCL (upper control limit) 70 — 60 — 50 — Average 40 — 30 — 20 — LCL 10 — (lower control limit) — — — — — — — — — — Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June YEAR 2001 Quality Control Chart with Average and Upper and Lower Limits Number of Visits by Parents to Resource Center