1 / 19

LORAN-C Friend or Foe? Mike Bedford

LORAN-C Friend or Foe? Mike Bedford. British Cave Research Association Cave Technology Symposium 2010 17 th April 2010, Horton-in-Ribblesdale, North Yorkshire. Overview of Presentation. LORAN-C is a radio navigation system intended for marine use. It interferes with cave radios e.g. HeyPhone.

jersey
Télécharger la présentation

LORAN-C Friend or Foe? Mike Bedford

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LORAN-CFriend or Foe?Mike Bedford British Cave Research AssociationCave Technology Symposium 201017th April 2010, Horton-in-Ribblesdale, North Yorkshire

  2. Overview of Presentation • LORAN-C is a radio navigation systemintended for marine use. • It interferes with cave radios e.g. HeyPhone. • Despite it making communication difficult, there are some potential benefits for cavers. • Here I provide background on LORAN-C and discuss possible caving applications.

  3. Hyperbolic Navigation (1) • LORAN-C is a hyperbolicnavigation system. • Operates by measuringtime distance of arrivalof signals from a pair ofsynchronised transmitters.

  4. Hyperbolic Navigation (2) • By using two pairsof transmitters afix can be obtained.

  5. LORAN-C Frequency • 100kHz centre frequency • 99% of power within 90-110kHz… • … but high power transmitters • … therefore significant signal at 87kHz • … hence interference for cave radios • Later presentation on a method of preventingLoran-C interference

  6. LORAN-C Chains • LORAN-C is organised in “chains” • A chain covers a geographical area • Chain comprises master station (M)… • … plus 2 – 4 slaves (W, X, Y, Z) • More than one chain might be detectable • So chains are differentiated by their Group Repetition Interval (GRI)

  7. LORAN-C Timing

  8. LORAN-C Pulses

  9. Accuracy • Unlike GPS, LORAN-C accuracy depends on receiver location with respect to transmitters • Best on baseline between master and slave because LOPs are closer here • Absolute accuracy 185 – 463m • Repeatable accuracy 18 – 91m • eLORAN improves this to 8 – 20m

  10. Underground Performance • Accuracy inferior to GPS… • … but LORAN-C is available underground • But will signal strength by adequate? • Actually s/n is the most important factor and less noise underground • Patent Application WO 20061130223 claims improved s/n underground

  11. Underground Accuracy • Non-uniform geology • Sloping surface topology • Therefore accuracy possibly degraded

  12. Caving Applications • Accuracy not nearly good enough for normal surveying but… • … “differential accuracy” may be good enough for “rough and ready” surveying (e.g. new cave on expedition) • Repeatable accuracy might be good enough to permit its use for underground route finding (a contentious application)

  13. Future of LORAN-C (1) • For years we’ve been expecting LORAN-C to be phased out – good news for cave radio • LORAN-C was turned off in North America earlier this year • LORAN-C chains in Europe were transferred from US Navy to host nations in 1995 • Some have closed (e.g. Mediterranean Sea)

  14. Future of LORAN-C (2) • North East Europe chainswere managed by NELS • NELS agreement terminated in 2005 • However, ad hoc arrangement still exists between host nations and most are committed to continuation in the mid term • Stations being upgraded to eLORAN

  15. Chayka • Chayka was developed by USSR • Similar to LORAN-C • Same frequency but different pulse shape • Russian Chayka chains also remain operational • West Russia chain available in Eastern Europe • Some Loran-C receivers also useChayka signals

  16. Former NELS Chains

  17. Former NELS & Chayka Chains

  18. Where Next? • LORAN-C receivers are cheap • Former US users off-loading for a few dollars • Time for some underground experiments?

  19. Thank you for ListeningAny Questions?

More Related