1 / 23

Quest Atlantis Homepage Tutorial Project

Quest Atlantis Homepage Tutorial Project. Min-joung Kim Ming Ma Pil-Won On. Project Description. Target Audience. Language English Age 9 to 12 year-old Gender Boys : Girls = 5: 1 Pre-requisite knowledge Minimum pre-experience of using the 3-D interface (logging in the QA)

jessie
Télécharger la présentation

Quest Atlantis Homepage Tutorial Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quest Atlantis Homepage Tutorial Project Min-joung Kim Ming Ma Pil-Won On

  2. Project Description

  3. Target Audience • Language • English • Age • 9 to 12 year-old • Gender • Boys : Girls = 5: 1 • Pre-requisite knowledge • Minimum pre-experience of using the 3-D interface (logging in the QA) • Starting a computer and a program, using a mouse and a keyboard

  4. Context • Mainly in a local Boys and Girls Club with fast internet connection. • Users should be registered in QA.

  5. Objectives • Banner • Name of Quester • Emoticon • Email • Link to pop-up email page • Message for any new mail Navigation Links Links to other side-bar pages Side-bar Contents Title and summary information Pop-Up Link Opens content in pop-up window with complete details for reviewing or editing

  6. Objectives After going through the QA Home Page tutorial, learners will be able to: • Identify each feature on the side-bar page • Banner • Identify the owner of home page. • Identify what the emoticon is. • Email • Identify the label of email. • Identify the number of new email. • Navigation links • Identify what “home” is for. • Identify what “friends” is for. • Identify what “quests” is for. • Pop-up link • Identify the link to a pop-up. • Utilize the function of “home” page editing. in 80% of successful completion without any help from mentors.

  7. Merrill’s 5 Stars Instructional Design • Problem: Utilize the function of the side-bar (ex) • Activation: Use analogy of a “ House ” (ex1, ex2) • Demonstration: Show as a movie, guided practice (ex1, ex2) • Application: Practice part - skateboarding game (ex1) • Integration: The learners actually apply their learning for the real side-bar.

  8. QA training team’s 6th star • Motivation • Talking head • Familiar environment • Skateboarding game • Use one of the avatars in QA • Visual reinforcement • Award: 4 points for completion • Animation: flash movies

  9. Expert review of paper prototype • Conducted expert review with Lauryl and Dr. Frick • After the review, added different words for feedback. For example, “good job”, “great”, “excellent”, etc. • Changed “friends, quests, and home” in the questions with other words to avoid giving hints to learners.

  10. Paper Prototype usability test • Information of the subjects

  11. Scale of reactionnare 5. I will tell my friends to play with this tutorial.

  12. Paper Prototype usability test

  13. Paper Prototype usability test • Comparison of pre-test and post-test results

  14. Paper Prototype usability test • Comparison of pre-test and post-test results: individual performance

  15. Paper Prototype usability test • Revisions on improving instructional effectives

  16. Paper Prototype usability test • Revision on improving learner satisfaction

  17. Paper Prototype usability test • Revisions on improving usability

  18. Computer prototype usability test • Information of the subjects

  19. Computer prototype usability test • Results

  20. Computer prototype usability test • Comparison of pre and post test results

  21. Computer prototype usability test • Comparison of pre and post test results: individual performance

  22. Computer prototype usability test • Revision

  23. Questions or Comments?

More Related