1 / 31

PENSION REFORM – lessons for the UK from other countries

PENSION REFORM – lessons for the UK from other countries. Chris Daykin, Government Actuary. PENSION REFORM. What are the imperatives? recognise the impact of longevity ensure sustainability of structure and financing avoid large increases in public expenditure

jmargret
Télécharger la présentation

PENSION REFORM – lessons for the UK from other countries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PENSION REFORM – lessons for the UK from other countries Chris Daykin, Government Actuary

  2. PENSION REFORM • What are the imperatives? • recognise the impact of longevity • ensure sustainability of structure and financing • avoid large increases in public expenditure • reduce intergenerational dependency • reduce perverse incentives in labour market • improve retirement incentive structures • improve incentives for saving • increase coverage

  3. PENSION REFORM • Reform strategies • usually start with state sponsored social security • contribution adjustment and reform • benefit adjustment and reform • comprehensive or structural reform • reform of retirement age and structures • new approaches to financing old schemes • development of funded supplementary pensions

  4. PENSION REFORM • Possible structural reforms of social security • move to notional defined contributions • introduce or increase flat-rate element • link pension to residence instead of contributions • make greater use of means-testing… • …or reduce dependence on means-testing • partially fund social security • increase role of funded private pensions

  5. PENSION REFORM • Notional Defined Contribution • structured as defined contribution… • … but on a PAYG basis rather than funded • clear link between contributions and benefits • choice of revaluation approaches • targets lump sum at pension age… • with ‘notional’ purchase of an annuity • permits flexibility of retirement age • passes on part of longevity risk • demographic adjustment factor needed to keep in balance

  6. Examples of NDC (broad definition) France Sweden Italy Poland Latvia Brazil China Russia Kyrgyz Republic Mongolia PENSION REFORM

  7. PENSION REFORM • World Bank views on NDC • DB is “flawed” – heterogeneous characteristics • NDC creates better incentive structure • benefits linked directly to contributions • penalty for retiring early • good trade-off between work and leisure • internalises adjustment to life expectancy • can be made self-adjusting in other ways • radical change easier to effect • much harder to “game” than DB

  8. LESSONS FROM SWEDEN • Swedish NDC • DB state scheme replaced by NDC • …with fairly fast transition • revalorisation of individual accounts by average wage • credits for sickness and other absences • automatic economic regulator on pensions increase • annuity responds to improving mortality • automatic balancing mechanism

  9. LESSONS FROM SWEDEN • Automatic balancing mechanism (‘actuarial accounting’) • Annual balance sheet for scheme: • Liabilities = • present value of all future outlay for pensions in payment • + accumulated individual accounts for all persons not yet in receipt of a pension • Assets = • real assets in buffer fund + value of future contributions • Value of future contributions = • contribution rate x wage mass x expected turnover duration

  10. LESSONS FROM SWEDEN • Expected turnover duration

  11. LESSONS FROM SWEDEN • Individual accounts • mandatory funded individual accounts (PPM) • 2½% of earnings • contributions collected with NDC contributions of 16% • low administrative costs • choice of 700 investment funds • default arrangements if no funds selected • 90% of wage-earners covered by occupational schemes • operated largely on industry-wide basis

  12. LESSONS FROM SWEDEN • Overall evaluation • hailed by many as a success story • sustainable PAYG system • increased level of savings achieved through PPM • but high level of disinterest in investment choice • rising concern about expected fall in replacement ratios… • …and arbitrary effect of automatic balancing mechanism • inequality of earnings mirrored in retirement income • still need minimum pension guarantee… • …but this is price indexed and dwindling away

  13. LESSONS FROM FINLAND • Improved targeting • basic pension used to be flat-rate and contributory • mandatory earnings-related scheme • industry-wide rather than individual employer schemes • basic pension turned into a minimum pension guarantee… • …measured against the earnings-related pension • …so no means-test or asset test • dramatically cut the cost of the basic pension… • …and focussed expenditure on lower paid

  14. LESSONS FROM FINLAND • Dealing with demographic ageing • objectives of reform of earnings-related scheme • to postpone average age of retirement by 2 to 3 years • to adapt the pension system to increased expectations of life • to reduce pressures for future increases in contributions • to unify and simplify the various separate schemes • to harmonise public and private pension schemes • average of last 10 years → career average revalued • variable accrual rate • 1.5% a year from 18 to 52 • 1.9% a year from 53 to 62 • 4.5% a year from 63 to 68

  15. LESSONS FROM FINLAND • Dealing with demographic ageing • introducing life expectancy coefficient • Life expectancy coefficient for year N (>2009) = • cohort life expectancy for those reaching 62 in 2009 • cohort life expectancy for those reaching 62 in N • Multiply pensions of those reaching 62 in N • by life expectancy coefficient for year N • Thus adjusting a DB pension benefit for improving life expectancy

  16. LESSONS FROM GERMANY • Dealing with demographic ageing • still earnings not prices revaluation but… • …revaluation to net instead of gross wages • higher retirement age • reduced replacement rate at 65 • changes to survivorship and disability pensions • contribution rate not to exceed 22% in 2030 • sustainability factor

  17. LESSONS FROM GERMANY • Pension adjustment • Change in pensions = • Change in average income, net of contributions • x sustainability factor • Sustainability factor for year x = value for year x-1of • Number of active contributors • Number of pensioners • divided by corresponding value for year x-2

  18. LESSONS FROM GERMANY • More funding in Germany • Riester pensions • some tax privileges • administratively complex • full guarantee must be given on capital invested • benefits must be paid as whole of life annuities • Pensionsfonds • allows corporate pensions to be externally funded • more flexible than Pensionskasse or Unterstützungskasse • definite trend towards more pre-funding • further types of pension product

  19. LESSONS FROM DENMARK • Citizenship pensions • Folkepension introduced in 1956 as universal benefit • payable from age 67 • depended on citizenship and residence in Denmark • pension age reduced to 65 in 1999 to save money • much of Folkepension is now means-tested • problems with its application to immigrants • ATP is second pillar of public pension • DC, fully funded and based on insurance principles

  20. LESSONS FROM DENMARK • Using with profits for occupational schemes • effectively compulsory through collective agreements • mostly DC (but also DB) • based on with-profits deferred annuity contracts • possibility of purchasing temporary annuities… • …using a proportion of the fund available at retirement • …and then another temporary annuity…

  21. LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND • Citizen’s pension • flat rate of benefit at or just above means-testing level • indexed to national average earnings • eligibility dependent on period of residence in NZ • individual entitlement, whether single or married • not dependent on pattern of working life • simple to understand and operate • no savings disincentive effects

  22. LESSONS FROM NEW ZEALAND • Kiwisaver • new, voluntary, work-based savings scheme • automatic enrolment for those starting new job • those in a job will be able to join if they wish • contributions from employees at 4% (or 8%) • contributions collected by Inland Revenue through PAYE • individual choice of scheme (with default) • employers can select a scheme – but no need to contribute • no withdrawal until age 65… • …except for deposit on a first home (after >3 yrs contns.) • existing DB or DC pension schemes can be exempted

  23. LESSONS FROM HONG KONG • Mandatory Provident Fund • no history of social security… • …but widespread DB occupational schemes • MPF introduced in 2000 • MPF contributions of 10% of salary + allowances… • …with earnings floor and ceiling • occupational retirement schemes can opt out

  24. LESSONS FROM AUSTRALIA • Means-testing and mandatory saving • no contributory social security • universal pension subject to test of income and assets • mandatory employer contribution of 9% from 2002/03 • mandatory employee contribution of 3% from 2002/03 • Industry Funds and Master Trusts • administrative problems at start • 90% of administration now with two providers • individual choice of fund finally being introduced

  25. LESSONS FROM ELSEWHERE • Other countries to study • Netherlands • Switzerland • Ireland

  26. PENSION REFORM • Goals of a pension system • Primary goals • To provide adequate, affordable, sustainable and robust old-age income • Secondary goals • To create developmental effects by • minimizing negative impacts • leveraging on positive impacts

  27. CONCLUSIONS • Wide range of solutions – DC favoured • everywhere has a different solution • but all are starting from different points • DC widely favoured for its incentive structure… • …but lacks basic characteristics of protection • …unless in with-profits form or with strong underpin • many national DC systems have a minimum pension • and few have the legacy problems that the UK has

  28. CONCLUSIONS • Wide range of solutions – new DB thinking • DB mostly moving to career-average revalued… • …which is equivalent to a type of DC • NDC is really a DB structure dressed up as DC • focus on fund at retirement facilitates longevity solutions • cash balance is another alternative DB/DC hybrid… • …or perhaps revisit with-profits DC • reconsider survivorship in light of individual entitlement

  29. CONCLUSIONS • Wide range of solutions – encourage later retirement • need stronger incentives to later retirement • a reason for DC but possibilities with DB also • higher pension age for unreduced pension forces trade-off • target lump sum at retirement instead of pension • alternative annuitisation possibilities • need better risk-sharing in decumulation phase

  30. CONCLUSIONS • Wide range of solutions – efficient savings • mandatory DC necessary to achieve full coverage… • …or almost mandatory • contributions should be collected centrally • avoid insurance wrappers • don’t have too much choice of investment funds • guaranteed minimum should underpin state pension only

  31. THE END • Questions and discussion

More Related