1 / 18

Orbit Selection Issues for Wide-Swath Altimeter

Orbit Selection Issues for Wide-Swath Altimeter. Don P. Chambers Center for Space Research The University of Texas at Austin Wide-Swath Ocean Sciences and Hydrology Meeting 31 October 2006. Overview. Consider orbits that are not sun-synchronous

jody
Télécharger la présentation

Orbit Selection Issues for Wide-Swath Altimeter

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Orbit Selection Issues forWide-Swath Altimeter Don P. Chambers Center for Space Research The University of Texas at Austin Wide-Swath Ocean Sciences and Hydrology Meeting 31 October 2006

  2. Overview • Consider orbits that are not sun-synchronous • Examine orbits at higher inclination and lower altitude than T/P-Jason • Use tidal aliasing frequencies to evaluate orbits • 8 largest constituents and S1 • Examine min. frequency and frequency separation • Discuss how these characteristics change in general vs. inclination, altitude, groundtrack repeat period 2

  3. Calculating Tide Alias Period • Alias period depends on the satellite’s exact repeat period and the period of the tide • TOPEX/Poseidon exact repeat period is 9.915625 days (“10-days”), or 237.975 hours • M2 period is 12.420601 hours • Although the tidal periods are known, the exact repeat period is a non-linear function of semi-major axis and inclination • Hundreds of orbits exist within a reasonable range of inclination and semi-major axis, each with very different aliasing frequencies 3

  4. Minimum Aliasing Frequency • Want to examine a few parameters related to alias frequencies to eliminate certain orbits from consideration • One parameter is minimum of all aliasing frequencies • Greater than 2 cycles-per year (period less than half-year) • This ensures multiple cycles of the any alias period within a few years so the tide can be estimated from the data 4

  5. Orbits & Tides • Repeat orbits can be found at any inclination that meet this criteria for some tides 5

  6. Orbits & Tides (cont) • Other tides have a problem as satellite inclination goes above 80° • Especially a problem for S1, S2 as orbit approaches sun-synchronous inclination where alias is very low-frequency (approaching a bias) 6

  7. General Observations • Only orbits with an inclination < 66° alias all major constituents to frequencies > 2 cpy • Retrograde orbits have poor aliasing of solar tides • If we do not require that the K1 alias > 2 cpy • Orbits that meet the requirement for all other constituents exist up to 80° inclination • This covers more of the Arctic Ocean, all of the Antarctic boundary, and most rivers in Siberia 7

  8. Frequency Separation • Another important factor to consider is the separation between alias frequencies and between the alias and annual/semi-annual frequency (Df) • Determines time needed to separate two tides in altimeter observations for an estimation • Time to separate ~ 1/Df • T/P did not have optimal separation for some constituents • K1 aliased to within 0.11 cpy of semi-annual • 9-years to separate 8

  9. There are orbits near 80° inclination that have better aliasing properties than T/P 9

  10. Average Frequency Separation • Find minimum separation between each constituent and all others (incl. annual, semiannual): fi • First requirement is the smallest be larger than some minimum value • For T/P, this was 0.167 cpy (~ 6-year separation time) • From these, calculate average • Higher numbers mean separation of all constituents in shorter time f1 f2 f3 f4 f5 f6 f7 f8 f9 f10 10

  11. Average f = 0.4 cpy implies mean separation time of 2.5 years, 0.7 cpy = 1.42 years • 800-1300 km altitude 11

  12. Inclination = 78° • Altitude ~ 845 km Exact Repeat Period (days) 12

  13. Conclusions • There are quite a few orbits at high inclinations that have excellent tidal aliasing properties • Inclinations as high as 78° • Altitudes ~ 800 to 900 km • Repeat periods cluster around 10- to 11-days and 20 to 22-days • Properties are even better than T/P-Jason if we ignore K1 in the minimum frequency calculation • Suggest that these orbits be studied in more detail for the Wide-Swath Altimeter 13

  14. Conclusions (cont) • Current “compromise” orbit being used in studies is based on a report I wrote 5 years ago • At that point, I was ignoring all orbits significantly lower than 1000 km because of orbit determination concerns • Also, was not considering S1 tide • We need to be careful not to hardcode this “compromise” orbit into any mission documents (as was done with NPOESS) until more studies are done

  15. Extras

  16. 800-1000 km altitude 16

  17. Calculating Tide Alias Period • Alias period () depends only on the satellite’s exact repeat period (Prepeat) and the period of the tide constituent (PTide) • Prepeat is the precise repeat period, not the nearest integer repeat period • e.g., TOPEX/Poseidon exact repeat period is 9.915625 days (“10-days”), or 856710 seconds 17

  18. Orbit Period & Repeat Period • Although the tidal constituent periods are known, the exact repeat period (Prepeat) is a non-linear function of semi-major axis (a) and inclination (i)

More Related