1 / 24

Like concepts repel unlike concepts attract

johana
Télécharger la présentation

Like concepts repel unlike concepts attract

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Like concepts repel unlike concepts attract Pasks Last Theorem For ALL forces: Gravitional, Electromagnetic, Weak and Strong nuclear force

    3. The Proof outlined Consider the parallel axis spin case (Wieners stable parallel self organisation case for the attraction of frequencies) Gravitational case A car stationary at the earths equator (weighs less than at a pole). [In general a Coriolis or geostrophic force will also be exerted (off the equator) for any movement on an orbiting body. This is a natural manifestation of Pasks third closure force of the Borromean triple.]

    4. The car moves Ignoring Coriolis effects To the West spins add and car is lighter because of increased centrifugal force To the East spins subtract and the car is lighter because of decreased centrifugal force Like spin or angular momentum repels Unlike spin or angular momentum attracts

    5. Spin Theorem Gravitational case

    6. Bohr Model Electrostatic Attraction Case

    7. The quantum Bohr model Assume gravitational attraction and no electrostatic forces. Bohr radius huge. Using ionization energy of hydrogen atom find spin kinetic energy of electron. Spin the electron opposite to the proton spin apply the unlike spins rule and the correct Bohr radius is produced

    8. Laithwaites Conical Pendulum The quantum as a precession phenomenon?

    9. Using Angular Momentum we unify a dynamical treatment of electromagnetic and gravitational forces No magnetic fields, North South poles etc No electrostatic fields, positive negative charges Just instantaneous conservation of angular momentum No more Forces just angular momentum to account for action at a distance and instantaneous gravitational attraction as seemed implicit in Whiteheads Process and Reality. Since weak and strong nuclear forces involve transfer of momentum as per QED/QCD a similar treatment may be assumed applicable Einsteins dream realised?

    10. Anthony Osborne and Viv Pope An Angular Momentum Synthesis of Gravitational and Electrostatic Forces Galilean Electrodynamics, Vol 14, Special Issue 1, Spring 2003, pp. 9 - 19 http://www.poams.org/lib/pub/pub_an_angular_momentum_synthesis.pdf POAMS: 'Pope-Osborne Angular Momentum Synthesis' Members of the ANPA Group

    13. Coupling: General case Where J is total angular momentum L is orbital and S is spin angular momentum f is the angle between L and S, the coupling When F= p/2 coupling is serial and weak or decoherent. (Cf Wiener attraction and repulsion of frequencies)

    14. Like spins The relativistic condition There are no doppelgangers Likeness, faith and duration Recursive packing: telephone cable Unfoldment- thought

    16. Whats all this Brunnian stuff?

    18. The Pask Forces Diagram

    19. Synchronisation Both in phase and out of phase. Baker and Blackburn in The Pendulum OUP 2005 conclude Weak driving with strong coupling=> synchronisation or coherence Strong driving with weak coupling=> unsynchronisation or decoherence

    20. There are no doppelgangers Pask and Relativistic Compliance Consider a pair of hydrogen atoms as counters or clocks. Acceleration histories of the two atoms will never be the same- even if frozen as water ice. Time dilatation and relativistic mass or energy considerations will show at some level of precision the atomic spectra of the atoms will be different. While coherent as eg dihydrogen their clocks will synchronise but their phase history will remain different (Thanks Tony) and the counts distinct. Two observers (or actors) may share a context but their different perspectives guarantees the no doppelgangers theorem. Best and worst case differences can be quantified.

    21. Time is Incommensurable for Actors The Lambda matrix for actors A matrix of matrices or a matrix of vectors? Certainly a list of interactions for all Actor Interactions. Thus ????x,t(j)), B(y,t(k))) represents an interaction between Actors A and B at time at actor A's time t(j). De Zeeuw argues the vector t(n) should be matrix. This requires all concurrent events to be coherent. An interaction produces decoherence. We ponder.

    22. Conjecture A given coherent set or persisting object exerts a net parity Coupling constants deriving from decoherence produce magnitudes

    23. The unobserved and the elementary: a new classification Bogons and Morons

    24. A Coriolis-like effect of the dynamical boson-fermion interaction in the interacting boson-fermion model. Physics Letters B, vol.199, no.4, 31 Dec. 1987, pp.482-8. Netherlands. V. Paar (Univ. Zagreb)

More Related