340 likes | 479 Vues
This thesis investigates the extent to which we construct a hierarchy of knowledge, emphasizing the interplay between art and science. It draws on Arthur Miller's “Space, Time, and the Beauty that Causes Havoc” to illuminate differing perceptions of artists and scientists. The discourse navigates through various mediums such as Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, the Theory of Relativity, and the impact of societal needs on knowledge classification. The work highlights the implications of blind faith in science and the marginalization of emotional responses, questioning our understanding of knowledge in contemporary society.
E N D
TOK Presentation Hierarchies of Knowledge
Thesis • To what extent do we create a hierarchy of knowledge?
Example • Extract from a book called “space, time and the beauty that causes havoc” by Arthur Miller. • An exploration between science and art
Les Demoiselles d'Avignon Theory of Relativity
Hierarchy of Knowledge Science Art
“Liberal” “Wild” “Emotional” “Lives life on the edge”
Emotional Response To Art I don’t understand it!
“Orderly” “Trustworthy” “Logical” “Inquisitive”
We value logical thought over emotional though • We create perceptions of artists and scientists the justify this view • We like to see ourselves as logical beings rather than slaves to our emotions.
Ancient Egyptians • Served a religious purpose • political purpose • Historical purpose
The Mali Empire • They put a lot of importance on the past • Griots were singers who told stories of the village • They were valued so highly that they were appointed advisors to the king
Implications • Blind Faith in Science • Put less importance on other areas of knowledge. • We create boundaries around area’s of knowledge.
Conclusion • To what extent do we create a hierarchy of knowledge? • - we do • - we value certain types of thought • - it is affected by the needs of society