SlideServe
Télécharger Obtenir Pro
Menu
Accueil Pro
Préférences
ApparenceLight Aide et commentaires
© SlideServe · v2026

PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY

josef avatar
josef
26 diapositives · 473 Views · Aug 08, 2014

PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY. New Administrator’s Meeting September 23, 2011 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department of Education . PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY. Title I Core Performance Indicators Title II Tech Prep Indicators. Section 113. Accountability.

#perkins accountability #perkins accountability ppt #powerpoint #presentation
PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY - slide 1
01 / 26PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation

  1. PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY New Administrator’s Meeting September 23, 2011 Krishnan Sudharsan Office of Career and Technical Education Michigan Department of Education

  2. PERKINS ACCOUNTABILITY Title I Core Performance Indicators Title II Tech Prep Indicators

  3. Section 113. Accountability Purpose “To establish and support State and local performance accountability systems…to assess the effectiveness of the State and the eligible recipients of the State in achieving statewide progress in career and technical education.”

  4. PIV: Accountability Focus • Indicators of performance must be valid and reliable • Technical skill assessments aligned with industry-recognized standards • Local accountability of eligible recipients is required

  5. PIV: Accountability Focus • Local program must agree to accept state adjusted levels of performance or negotiate • Professional development to assist in accessing and utilizing data

  6. PIV: Accountability Focus • Secretary may withhold all or a portion of a state’s funds if:… • State fails to implement an improvement plan • State fails to make improvement in performance levels • State fails to meet at least 90% of level of performance for 3 consecutive years

  7. PIV: Accountability Focus If a local recipient fails to meet at least 90% of a local adjusted level of performance for any of the core indicators, local recipient shall develop and implement a program improvement plan

  8. PIV: Accountability Focus • State may withhold all or a portion of a local recipient’s funding if: • Recipient fails to implement an improvement plan • Recipient fails to make any improvement in performance levels • Recipient fails to meet at least 90% of agreed upon state adjusted level of performance for 3 consecutive years

  9. PIV: Accountability Focus Tech Prep • Each Tech Prep consortium shall enter into an agreement to meet a minimum level of performance for each of the Title I and Title II performance indicators

  10. PIV: Accountability Focus Tech Prep (Title II) • Consortia that do not meet the performance levels for 3 consecutive years shall be to required to resubmit a Tech Prep grant application and may have funding terminated*

  11. Tech Prep (Title II) Indicators Tech Prep indicator data must be submitted for the 2010-2011 grant year by October 15, 2011 Tech Prep funding was eliminated for FY 2011-2012. No indicator data will be collected

  12. Tech Prep Data Collection Logistics • Submit on state-prepared and provided spreadsheet by region • Required: Numbers for all numerators and denominators

  13. Negotiating Local Adjusted Levels of Performance (ALP)-CPIs • 1S1 Acad. Achievement—Reading/LA • 1S2 Acad. Achievement—Math • State Perkins targets are NCLB Required Levels

  14. Negotiating Local ALP • 2S1 Technical Skill Attainment Technical Skills Assessments Major changes every year as % of students/programs report increases

  15. 3S1 High School Completion • Measure • 5 year cohort • ‘Regular diploma’ plus • GED, certificate • State recognized equivalent

  16. 4S1 High School Graduation • NCLB Measure • State Perkins target is state NCLB target • Review participating districts’ performance

  17. 5S1 Placement • Postsecondary Education/ Training • Military Service • Employment

  18. 6S1 and 6S2 Nontraditional • Different CIP Codes identified as ‘Nontraditional’ compared to PIII • 6S1 – Participation • 6S2 - Completion

  19. Reports • Perkins Core Performance Indicator Reports: www.CTEISReports.com Click Link: “Core Performance Indicator Reports”

  20. Core Performance Indicator Trends www.michigan.gov/OCTE Click link: “Data and Reports” Click link: “Michigan Core Performance Indicators: Trends by Region”

  21. Technical Skills AssessmentsCurrent Assessments

  22. Roles and Responsibilities: Administrator Prior to Assessment • Communicate assessment value and purpose • Oversee planning for test administration During Assessment • Monitor administration • Support Proctors After Assessment • Review assessment results • Use assessment data to improve learning

  23. Tools and Resources MDE OCTE Website http://michigan.gov/mde/0,1607,7-140-6530_2629_53970-247949--,00.html Business Assessments: NOCTI Website http://www.nocti.org/michigan.cfm

  24. Health Assessment: Oklahoma Career Tech http://www.okcareertech.org/healthtest/ • Jacqueline Dannis, 517-335-1066 • DannisJ@michigan.gov

  25. Questions? Krishnan Sudharsan SudharsanK@Michigan.gov 517-241-7652