1 / 29

DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH

DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH. Academic Achievement Meeting November 9, 2010. Davis Junior High School. Davis Junior High School MEAP 2005-2009 7 th & 8 th Grade. 7 th Grade increased 8% UCS increased 3% Cohort increased 4% UCS Cohort increased 4%. 8 th Grade increased 2% UCS increased 5%.

josh
Télécharger la présentation

DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DAVIS JUNIOR HIGH Academic Achievement Meeting November 9, 2010

  2. Davis Junior High School

  3. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 7th & 8th Grade 7th Grade increased 8% UCS increased 3% Cohort increased 4% UCS Cohort increased 4% 8th Grade increased 2% UCS increased 5%

  4. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20097th & 8th Grade 8th Grade increased 5% UCS 8th Grade increased 13% 7th Grade remained the same UCS 7th Grade increased 5% Cohort increased 7% UCS Cohort increased 8%

  5. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20097th & 8th Grade 7th Grade increased 13% UCS increased 10% Cohort decreased 6% UCS Cohort increased 18% 8th Grade increased4% UCS increased 24%

  6. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 7th & 8th Grade AYP 8th grade 54% 7th Grade increased 1% UCS increased 1% Cohort decreased 5% UCS cohort decreased 7% 8th Grade decreased 5% UCS decreased 3%

  7. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 7th & 8th Grade AYP 8th grade 54% 7th Grade remained the same Cohort decreased 3% UCS increased 3% UCS Cohort decreased 5% 8th Grade increased 10% UCS Increased 2%

  8. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20097th & 8th Grade AYP 8th grade 54% 7th Grade increase 25% UCS increase 12% Cohort decreased 11% UCS cohort decreased 6% 8th Grade decreased 12% UCS decreased5%

  9. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 8th Grade 8th Grade economically dis. remained the same UCS 8th Grade decreased 2% 8th Grade economically dis. increased 11% UCS 8th Grade economically dis. increased 5%

  10. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-20098th Grade 8th Grade decrease 6% UCS 8th Grade decreased 2%

  11. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 9th Grade 9th Grade decreased 10% UCS 9th Grade decreased 2% 9th Grade economically dis. decreased 1% UCS 9th Grade economically dis. stayed the same

  12. Davis Junior High SchoolMEAP 2005-2009 9th Grade 9th Grade decreased 18% UCS 9th Grade decreased 1%

  13. Tier II Indicators

  14. Reading Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient on the MEAP tests in reading, writing, math, science and social studies. • Reading Tier II Indicator: Increase the number of students who score at proficient or higher in Reading. • S.M.A.R.T. Goal: The percentage of Davis 7th, 8th and 9th grade students scoring proficient or higher in Reading will increase as measured by the school-wide expository assessment from ____% to _____%.

  15. Reading Tier II Indicator • 7th Grade Geography • Based on a variety of reading assessments, the 7th grade teachers have identified several deficiencies in comprehension of informational text: • MEAP – Inference, Locating Supporting Evidence • Explore Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Generalizations, Locating Supporting Evidence, Vocabulary • School-wide Expository Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Inference, Locating Supporting Evidence

  16. Reading Tier II Indicator MEAP GRAPH

  17. Reading Tier II Indicator • 8th Grade U.S. History • Based on a variety of reading assessments, the 8th grade teachers have identified several deficiencies in comprehension of informational text: • MEAP – Generalizations, Identifying Main Ideas • Explore Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Generalizations, Locating Supporting Evidence, Vocabulary • School-wide Expository Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Inference, Accessing Prior Knowledge, Metacognition, Vocabulary, Cause and Effect

  18. Reading Tier II Indicator • 9th Grade World Histriry • Based on a variety of reading assessments, the 9th grade teachers have identified several deficiencies in comprehension of informational text: • MME – Generalizations, Identifying Main Ideas, Inference • Explore Test – Identifying Main Ideas, Generalizations, Locating Supporting Evidence, Vocabulary • School-wide Expository Test – Inference, Chronological Order, Cause and Effect, Identifying Main Ideas.

  19. Reading Tier II Indicator

  20. Reaching Higher • By 2014, all students in the Utica Community Schools will meet or exceed proficiency standards in English language arts (reading and writing), math, science, social studies, fine arts and career and technical education, as defined by national, state and UCS standards.

  21. Reaching Higher

  22. Davis Junior High Action Plan 2010-2011 Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient on the MEAP tests in reading, writing, math, science and social studies. • Writing Tier II Indicator: Increase the number of students who score at proficient or higher in writing.

  23. 7th Grade Writing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Percentage of 7th grade students who achieve a score of 4 (out of a 6 point scale) or higher on the HRW Online Expository Essay assessment will increase from __% to __% by June 2011.

  24. 8th Grade Writing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Percentage of 8th grade students who achieve a score of 4 (out of a 6 point scale) or higher on Compare/Contrast Essay assessment will increase from __% to __% by June 2011.

  25. 9th Grade Writing S.M.A.R.T. Goal Percentage of 9th grade students who achieve a score of 4 (out of a 6 point scale) or higher on the ACT Persuasive Essay assessment will increase from 30% to 60% by June 2010.

  26. Math Tier II Indicator

  27. Science

  28. Science

  29. Special Education

More Related