1 / 15

Antihypertensive Agents in Hemodialysis Patients: Prescription Trends and Survival Analysis

This study examines prescription trends of antihypertensive agents in hemodialysis patients across different countries and their associations with patient characteristics and survival rates. The research assesses the prevalence of antihypertensive prescription, patient demographics, and the impact on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

justin-richard
Télécharger la présentation

Antihypertensive Agents in Hemodialysis Patients: Prescription Trends and Survival Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. When Using DOPPS Slides

  2. DOPPS Slide Use Guidelines

  3. Prescription of antihypertensive agents to hemodialysis patients: Time trends and associations with patient characteristics, country, and survival in the DOPPS

  4. Introduction

  5. Goal

  6. Methods

  7. Methods (2)

  8. Prevalence of AHA Prescription in Prevalent Samples from Countries that Participated in Both Phases of DOPPS

  9. Patient Characteristics by Any AHA in a cross-section of DOPPS I and DOPPS II (1)

  10. Patient Characteristics by Any AHA in a cross-section of DOPPS I and DOPPS II (2)

  11. Prevalence of AHA prescription by country, in a cross section of DOPPS II

  12. Adjusted RR (95% CI)* of All-cause Mortality Associated with each Class of AHA

  13. Adjusted RR (95% CI)* of Cardiovascular Mortality associated with each AHA

  14. Conclusions

  15. Acknowledgements

More Related