1 / 46

Large area transition-edge sensor array for particle induced X-ray emission spectroscopy

Large area transition-edge sensor array for particle induced X-ray emission spectroscopy. M Palosaari 1 , K Kinnunen 1 , I Maasilta 1 , C Reintsema 2 , D Schmidt 2 , J Fowler 2 , R Doriese 2 , J Ullom 2 , M Käyhkö 1 , J Julin 1 , Mikko Laitinen 1 , T Sajavaara 1.

kamal
Télécharger la présentation

Large area transition-edge sensor array for particle induced X-ray emission spectroscopy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Large area transition-edge sensor array for particle induced X-ray emission spectroscopy M Palosaari1, K Kinnunen1, I Maasilta1, C Reintsema2, D Schmidt2, J Fowler2, R Doriese2, J Ullom2, M Käyhkö1, J Julin1, Mikko Laitinen1, T Sajavaara1 1Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, Jyväskylä 40014, Finland 2National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder CO 80305, United States email: mikko.i.laitinen@jyu.fi

  2. INTRODUCTION to TESSuperconducting Transition-Edge Sensor

  3. Transition-Edge Sensor (TES) • TES as a calorimeter • Measures the energy of incident radiation Typical pulse from a calorimeter Schematics of a calorimeter

  4. TES Operation • Operates between superconducting and normal state • Extremely sensitive R(T) • Excellent energy resolution • Wide energy range • Detects radiation,in our case X-rays • Particles also possible Normal state transition edge Superconducting state Typicaltransition of a TES

  5. TES basics • TES thin film device is made of normal metal - superconducting metal bilayer. • The absorber details depend on the desired energy range. • TESs are usually fabricated on thin SiN membranes to limit the thermal conductivity G. In typical TES array, all pixels different -> automated calibration essential Photograph of a 256 pixelTES array made in VTT, Finland.

  6. PIXE-TES SETUP IN JYVÄSKYLÄ

  7. PIXE-TES Setup in Jyväskylä

  8. Details inside the instrument ~15 mm ~300 mm

  9. Jyväskylä TES specifications • 160 pixels from NIST, upgradable to 256 (from VTT) • Total area with 160 pixels ~16 mm2 • Single pixel count rate limited to <20 Hz, typical value 10 Hz • 2 mm thick Bi absorber with Mo/Cu superconducting juction • Detection efficiencieswith 100 um of Be:80 % at 5 keV,20 % at 10 keV, 5 % at 30 keV • Low energies limited byMeV particle absorber,probably not needed

  10. PIXE-TES MEASUREMENTSFrom a single pixel to many…

  11. PIXE-TES results from Jyväskylä Roughly one year ago: 12 pixels Mn Kα from Fe-55 source Best pixel Instrumental resolution for the best pixel with 55Fe source was 3.06 eV

  12. PIXE-TES results from Jyväskylä Now: 160 pixels… • But, Computer interface and I/O cards cannot handle all pixels simultaneously • I/O card + PC update coming from NIST to finally secure the function of all 256 possible channels, simultaneously. This month: data with Fe-55 source Resolution around 5 eVfor combined 40 pixels, Improvement seen bybetter data analysis

  13. PIXE-TES results from Jyväskylä SRM-611, trace elements in glass All TES data shown was analyzed last week, 1 eV / bin Analysis resolution for all of these plots ~10 eV

  14. PIXE-TES results from Jyväskylä SRM-611, trace elements in glass

  15. PIXE-TES results from Jyväskylä SRM-611, trace elements in glass Differences between pixels which are not only statistics

  16. PIXE-TES results from Jyväskylä SRM-1157, speciality tool steel No Si escape peak Bi escape peaks Single measurement, wide energy range

  17. PIXE-TES results from Jyväskylä SRM-1157, speciality tool steel V, Cr, Mn, Fe separated

  18. In the NearFuture • Read-out upgraded to full scale. • Modification of PIXE setup to be able to measure samples in atmosphere. • Study art samples in a project that just started • X-ray measurements with our own detector array fabricated by VTT. • Study the satellite peaks with different ions and energies. • ->> Chemical information from wide energy/elemental range ???

  19. Conclusions • Instrumental resolution of 3 eV demonstrated • Combined pixel resolution of ~5 eV looks realistic • Wide energy scale (“0” to tens of keV) • Reasonable count rates available (10 Hz/pixel, 256 pixels) • Active detector area about 16 mm2 • No liquid He needed for ADR cryo cooler • Largish instrument: ~5 cm sample-to-detector • Data handling and analysis: automation necessary • Is the chemical information achievable, after all ?

  20. Acknowledgements

  21. t 3-8. July, 2016, in Jyväskylä, Finland

  22. Pixel calibration Single pixel shows Si peaks nicely but without good calibration, sum spectrum useless Sample: SRM-611 No/bad calibration regime good calibration

  23. TES-PIXE data calibration Rawpulseheight datawheresamplewaschanged. Sample 1 Sample 2 Eenergyscale SubstratewasSi for bothsamples Measurementtime/duration

  24. TES-PIXE data • Makingselection to single (example) emission line • Beforelinerfit Straightline to guide the eye

  25. TES-PIXE data • Afterlinearfit Si Si Straightline to guide the eye

  26. Nitridehits

  27. PIXE Mn vs. 55Fe Mn Kα from Fe55 source same pixel • What is the origin of the hump?

  28. Detectorperformance: PIXE Mn vs. 55Fe source • Instrumental resolution for the best pixel with 55Fe source was 3.06 eV. • For 2 MeV protons and Mn sample resolution was 4.20 eV. M. Palosaari et. al J. Low Temp. DOI 201310.1007/s10909-013-1004-5

  29. PIXE applications • With betterdetectorsonecouldsee thechemicalenvironmentof the sample. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 073105 (2007) J. Hasegawa et. al • Traditional PIXE applications • Archaeology • Geology • Filters in industry • Old paintings

  30. TES vs. SDD • Impurities in the Cu sample resolved better with TES detector

  31. Stainlesssteelexample

  32. PIXE Mn vs. 55Fe Mn Kα from Fe55 source same pixel • FWHM broadens less than 1eV.

  33. TES vs. SDD

  34. TES circuit diagram

  35. Example: Thin film with high mass element • Atomic layer deposited Ru film on HF cleaned Si • Scattered beam, 35Cl, used for Ru deph profile • Monte Carlo simulations needed for getting reliable values for light impurities at the middle of the film Ru SiO2 Si Poor E resolution Low energy heavy ion ERDA – See posters!

  36. Example: Diamond-like carbon films • 2.3 µm thick diamond-like-carbon film on Si, measured with 9 MeV 35Cl • All isotopes can be determined for light masses • Light elements can be well quantified (N content 0.05±0.02 at.%) Low energy heavy ion ERDA

  37. ALD 8.6 nm Al2O3/Si • Atomic layer deposited Al2O3 film on silicon (Prof. Ritala, U. of Helsinki) • Density of 2.9 g/cm3 and thickness of 8.6 nm determined with XRR (Ritala) • Elemental concentrations in the film bulk as determined with TOF ERDA are O 60±3 at.%, Al 35±2 at.%, H 4±1 at.%. and C 0.5±0.2 at.%

  38. 10 nm CNx on silicon • TOF-ERDA results from sputter deposited 10 nm thick CNx hard coating on Si. Measured with 6 MeV 35Cl beam and extreme glancing angle of 3° • A density of 2.0 g/cm3 was used in converting areal densities to nm

  39. Effect of stripper gas pressure • 13.6 MeV 63Cu7+ CaPO (hydroxyapatite)

  40. Gas ionization detector • Thin (~100 nm) SiN window • Electrons for T2 timing signal emitted from the membrane

  41. Future improvements: Gas ionization detector 30 mm TOF-E results from ETH Zürich Incident ion 12 MeV 127I and borosilicate glass target 200 nm thick SiN membrane from Aalto University, Finland, on 100 mm wafer Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 248 (2006) 155-162

  42. Gas ionization detector to replace Si-energy detector • Why try to fix a well working system? • Greatly improved energy resolution for low energy heavy ions → heavier masses can be resolved • Gas detector is 1D position sensitive by nature → possibility for kinematic correction and therefore larger solid angles possible • Gas detector does not suffer from ion bombardment Recoil ranges in isobutane 8.5 MeV 35Cl 10.2 MeV 79Br Gas ionization detector develoment – See posters!

More Related