1 / 19

Evaluating the Effectiveness of NT Spatial Transformation Instruments in Urban Development

This presentation explores the effectiveness of NT Spatial Transformation Instruments within the built environment investment framework. It examines various instruments, their effectiveness in promoting outcomes-based public and private investments, and strategies for enhancing their impact. Key areas include targeting urban management, capital funding, and intergovernmental collaboration. The discussion addresses input levels in economic development, housing, and transport, while proposing actionable improvements to achieve better spatial prioritization through enhanced budgeting and stronger private sector linkages.

kamran
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluating the Effectiveness of NT Spatial Transformation Instruments in Urban Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How effective are the NT Spatial Transformation Instruments?

  2. Presentation Framework • Introduction • What are the instruments? • How effective are they? • How can we improve effectiveness?

  3. Introduction

  4. An Outcomes-based Built Environment Investment Strategy Private Investment Outcomes-based Public Investment Strategy Inclusive Urban Form Household Investment

  5. Inclusive Urban Form

  6. Walkability 400m WALKING DISTANCE 800m WALKING DISTANCE

  7. Walkability Precinct A Precinct B

  8. BEPPs - Built Environment Value Chain Spatial Targeting Intergovernmental project pipeline Capital Funding Implementation Targeted Urban Management Reporting & Evaluation Institutional Arrangements & Operations Budgeting

  9. Spatial Targeting – The Urban Network

  10. What are the instruments?

  11. What are the instruments?

  12. How effective are the instruments?

  13. How effective are the instruments?Output/Outcome Levels • Level of high density, mixed-use investment in targeted Integration Zone (TOD) precincts • Private Sector • Commercial, Retail and Light Industrial • Residential • Households investment in housing • Public Sector • Residential • Transport options to regional opportunities • Community and Government facilities • Level of investment in spatially prioritised informal settlements • Residential • Transport options to regional opportunities • Community and Government facilities • Prioritised, established commercial nodes and CBDs • Level of affordable housing investment (public and private) • Affordable and safe public transport options from marginalised residential areas

  14. How effective are the instruments? Input/Activity Levels • To what extent is economic development, housing and transport addressed in each part of the BEVC? • How many targeted zones/nodes are there? How realistic is the extent of the targeted zones/nodes – is this affordable to the public & private sectors and households? Is their economic appetite for this? • To what extent is spatial prioritisation aligned between sectors within and between spheres/SOEs? Between IPTN and BEPP Integration Zone TOD nodes? • Degree to which outcomes-based spatial prioritisation is altered by politicians • How effective is the overall funding mix? • What percentage of the total capital budget (all spheres) is being allocated to the investment in the 3 spatial targeting categories? • Is the UDZ leverage in CBDs sufficient?

  15. UDZ Cost-Benefit Analysis – 2014

  16. How can we improve the effectiveness of the instruments?

  17. How can we improve effectiveness? • Introduce Spatial Budgeting into the National, SOE, Provincial & Municipal budget processes – (political) agreement on spatial priorities (Integration Zone/TOD nodes) and intergovernmental project pipelines per TOD node? • Assignment of housing and transport functions to qualifying municipalities • Role of DORA/grant conditions – PRASA, Transport, Human Settlements • Balance between persuasion and prescription • More outcomes-based toolkits (e.g. IZ Planning Guidelines) • BEPP to be strengthened and established as the instrument that integrates other built environment instruments (across government) • Programme preparation guidelines to be released to bridge the gap between spatial planning and implementation • Better private sector linkages via SAPMI • More support towards improved spatial targeting, i.e. affordability/market absorption analysis

  18. Thank You

More Related