1 / 80

Chapter 12

Chapter 12. The Stages of Learning Pages: 263-266, 269-289 Drop – Gentiles two stage model. Learning stages. 3 stage information processing model. Where is effort directed (attention-focus)?. Fitts and Posner’s model: stage 1. Cognitive stage What processes are weighted the most?

kanoa
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 12

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 12 The Stages of Learning Pages: 263-266, 269-289 Drop – Gentiles two stage model

  2. Learning stages • 3 stage information processing model • Where is effort directed (attention-focus)?

  3. Fitts and Posner’s model: stage 1 • Cognitive stage • What processes are weighted the most? • Performance characteristics • Performance corrections

  4. Fitts and Posner’s model: stage 2 • Associative stage • Performance • Performance corrections

  5. Fitts and Posner’s model: stage 3 • Autonomous stage • Performance • Performance corrections

  6. Describe the following based on stages • Little league baseball • Youth soccer • Adult exercise • Rehabilitation following stroke

  7. 180 extension 140 Knee 100 flexion 60 160 200 240 extension Hip flexion Changes in kinematics: learning • Anderson and Sideway (1994) – soccer kick

  8. Changes in muscle patterns: learning • Jaegers et al. (1989) – dart throwing clav. pect. ant. delt. Latis. dorsi clav. pect. ant. delt. Latis. dorsi

  9. Changes in brain loops: learning • Doyen and Colleagues (2002, 2003) • Early in learning • Late in learning

  10. From learning to expertise • Is expert performance just a matter of changing kinematic, muscle, and brain patterns with practice? • Or • Does the change in patterns indicate something innate or special to an individual?

  11. Evaluating Expert Performance • Theories of exceptional abilities • Gardner (1983) • Newell and Simon (1972) • Ericsson and Charness (1994)

  12. Do child prodigies become the best performers in their fields?

  13. Innate factors: physiological measures • Ericsson and Charness (1994) – arguments against Gardner • What changes physiologically with practice? • What happens to physiological changes if practice is stopped? • Argues against a purely fixed innate biological basis for expertise

  14. Increasing processing skills • Arguments against Newell and Simon • Reaction time Evidence • Spatial ability and memory evidence • Decision making • Do basic processing skills lead to exceptional performance? No!

  15. Ericsson and Charness (1994): What is deliberate practice? • Deliberate practice is:

  16. Characteristics of deliberate practice • How much practice is required to become an expert? • Regulation of practice • Purpose of deliberate practice

  17. What does deliberate practice produce? • Knowledge structure and processing efficiency

  18. Examining the time scale of expertise • Ericsson (1990)

  19. Domain specific performance • How well does highly learned behavior transfer? • Expert performance seems to be domain specific

  20. Is talent necessary to develop expertise? …the strong evidence for adaptive changes through extended practice, suggest that the influence of innate, domain-specific basic capacities (talent) on expert performance is small, possibly even negligible. We believe that the motivational factors that predispose children and adults to engage in deliberate practice are more likely to predict individual differences in level of attained expert performance Ericsson & Lehmann, 1996

  21. Chapter 15 Augmented Feedback

  22. General definitions of feedback • Task intrinsic feedback (Chapter 6) • Augmented feedback • Type of information presented • Time of presentation • Categories

  23. Examples of augmented feedback • Golf • Qualitative • Quantitative

  24. Presenting augmented feedback • Goal-oriented KR • Body oriented KP

  25. Impact of augmented feedback on learning • Negative impact • Positive impact

  26. Too much feedback can create a dependency: Guidance • Winstein et al (1996) • 3 feedback groups – 80 practice trials • Which group will perform the best on a retention test without any feedback?

  27. 12 10 8 Absolute error (%) 6 4 2 End of practice Retention Guidance:Results of weight bearing task • How do you control for guidance?

  28. Absolute and relative frequency: Fading • Winstein and Schmidt (1990) • Practice conditions (16 blocks) • Experimental issue:

  29. Fading: results 12 RMS error score (deg) 10 8 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 I 2D Retention Acquisition

  30. Delaying information on performance:Summary with a simple task • Schmidt et al. (1989) T1 T2 • Feedback presentation • Experimental issue:

  31. Summary KR: simple task results 100 80 60 Absolute error (ms) 40 20 • 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Im 2D Retention (25 trial-blocks) Acquisition (15 trial-blocks)

  32. Delaying information on performance:Summary with a more difficult task • Schmidt et al. (1990) Flex elbow Extend elbow • Two goals: • Feedback presentation • Based on previous experiment:

  33. Summary KR: difficult task results Performance score

  34. Comparison of KP and KR • Kernodle and Carlton (1992) • Feedback presentation: • Did see ball flight or landing • Experimental issues: • Independent and dependent variables

  35. 2 Mean Distanced Gained (m) 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Testing Session Comparison of KP and KR • Performance outcome

  36. 10 9 8 Subjective form rating 7 6 5 4 1 2 3 4 5 Test session Feedback comparison results • Performance evaluation

  37. Augmented feedback should • Focus attention on • Provide information for • Serve as a motivating force (KR) • When is KR the least beneficial?

  38. Chapter 13 Transfer of Learning

  39. Transfer of performance gains • How do you test for transfer of gains? • Definitions of transfer

  40. Transfer tests and relevance • Types of transfer tests • Theoretical • Practical

  41. Bilateral transfer in a discrete task • Sainburg and Wang (2002) – discrete action • Manipulate - Initial arm • Transfer • Issue

  42. Bilateral transfer in a discrete taskSainburg and Wang (2002) Training RA Training LA Transfer LA Transfer RA

  43. Hemispheric roles in arm control • Sainburg and Wang (2002) concluded • Left-hemisphere: ND to D transfer • Right-hemisphere: D to ND transfer

  44. Bilateral transfer task in a rhythmic task • Buchanan et al. (2007) – continuous motion In-phase anti-phase ext ext ext elbow elbow elbow flx flx flx flx ext flx ext flx ext wrist wrist wrist

  45. Bilateral transfer in a rhythmic taskBuchanan et al (2007) • Training: 2 days • What did participants learn?

  46. 100 80 60 40 20 0 Dominant Non-dominant Symmetric transfer of relative phase • Relative phase goal: 90o

  47. 1 0.5 0 dominant Non-dominant Asymmetric transfer of joint amplitudes • Amplitude goal: Wrist/Elbow = 48o/80o = 0.6

  48. Transfer is task and limb specific • Buchanan et al (2007) • Left-hemisphere • Right-hemisphere

  49. Bilateral transfer in a sequencing task • Park and Shea (2006) • Transfer Conditions • Experimental Issue

  50. Bilateral transfer in a sequencing task • Time series and Movement time

More Related