1 / 7

Future needs for EIONET data flows for European biodiversity assessments

Future needs for EIONET data flows for European biodiversity assessments. Break- out group A. Prioritizing critieria for new proposals. 1 . Agreed reporting obligation at the European/global level. Legally binding measures

karl
Télécharger la présentation

Future needs for EIONET data flows for European biodiversity assessments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Future needs for EIONET data flows for European biodiversity assessments Break- out group A

  2. Prioritizingcritieria for new proposals 1. Agreed reporting obligation at the European/global level. Legally binding measures 2. Relevant indicator developed at national/European/international level 3. Policy relevance at the European/global level 4. Added value in terms of existing/ improving the level of the relevant level of the relevant institutional capacity on the countries 5. Added value in in terms of meeting an acknow-ledged data/information gap at the European level.

  3. CommentstoQuestion 1 • Why are we are trying to expand what we have when we have such great gaps in the dataflows today? More efforts should be made by the EEA to help MS to help meet present requirements. • Difficult to explore new areas where we have not agreed on indicators for common implementation framework

  4. CommentstoQuestion 1 • Emphasize not increasing the burden • First priority is Aichi targets A indicators. C category more relevant for national levels. • SEBI and Aichi indicators often the same. • Thread of flexibility. Reporting to European level and global – should have flexibility • Need to harmonize data

  5. New dataflows • Ecosytem services indicator • IAS – data available in a numberofcountries in variousstatesofavailability(i.e. UK, Norway, Switzerlandcandelivertoday), gaps in others • Bats – data availablethroughBatlife (Eurobats. Important for public awareness • Insects • NumberofNGO’s

  6. Question 2 – general comments • Problem with mobilization of data, financial resources needed to be accessed.

  7. Commentscont. • RoleofNGO’s in developing and supporting new indicators • Importanttousegrassroot support whenavailable • Valuablewithvoluntarycitizen science reporting, butdifficultto cover an entire country. Pointwisemonitoringbetter for supportingindicators.

More Related