1 / 32

Amphibious Homes: A Real Solution to Flooding?

Fabian Nehrbass. Amphibious Homes: A Real Solution to Flooding?. Sea level rise- floods. Thailand $45 billion dollars damage due to floods in the past two years Australia $9.6 billion 1.4 million people live in Louisiana’s coastal parishes 634,000 homes New Orleans sea level rise:

keefe
Télécharger la présentation

Amphibious Homes: A Real Solution to Flooding?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fabian Nehrbass Amphibious Homes: A Real Solution to Flooding?

  2. Sea level rise- floods • Thailand $45 billion dollars damage due to floods in the past two years • Australia $9.6 billion • 1.4 million people live in Louisiana’s coastal parishes • 634,000 homes • New Orleans sea level rise: • 8” by 2030 • 19” by 2050

  3. Possible solutions: • Levees • Restoration of wetlands • Sediment use form Mississippi to rebuild land • Abandon land • Adapt!

  4. Amphibious homes • Allows the home to sit close to the ground, and in the event of a flood, rise up with the rising water

  5. Why not just elevate homes? • Increased vulnerability of the structure to wind damage • Elevations are expensive • $40,000-$60,000 to elevate vs. $25,000 to retrofit existing house with floating foundation • Difficult access to living areas • Loss of character

  6. Advantages of floating homes • No loss of character • Cheaper than elevating • No issues with soil subsidence • Less vulnerable to hurricane damage

  7. Problems with floating homes • FEMA does not believe they are a good strategy to protect against hurricane flooding • Storm surge can still push water into such a home • Still need to evacuate • Only work in areas where water rises slowly • Size and weight limitations

  8. Problems continued • **National Flood Insurance Program will not insure floating houses because they are not considered anchored to the ground** • Chance they aren’t allowed • In Lakeview, house wasn’t allowed in “special flood hazard zone” • More susceptible to wind damage?

  9. FEMA • Suggestions

  10. How it works – Buoyant Foundation Project • Shotgun retrofitting • Buoyancy blocks and a vertical guidance system interconnected by a light structural frame • Utility lines have either long, coiled “umbilical” lines or self-sealing “breakaway” connections that disconnect gas and sewer lines when the house begins to rise

  11. Examples • Netherlands • Maas River • Prison • Greenhouses • Maldives – designed by Watersudio • Raccourci Old River, Louisiana • 9th Ward • Lakeview • UK

  12. FLOAT House, 9th Ward

  13. FLOAT House, 9th Ward

  14. FLOAT House, 9th Ward

  15. “Noah’s Ark” –Lakeview

  16. Raccourci Old River

  17. Maas River • $310,000 each (about 25% greater) • All survived major floods in 2011

  18. Maas River

  19. Maas River

  20. Floating prison- Zaandem, Netherlands

  21. Floating prison- Zaandem, Netherlands

  22. Maldives

  23. Maldives

  24. Conclusion • No flood insurance, no success • Frequency of storms? • Wind protection? • Float them down the river to Baton Rouge!

More Related