1 / 11

Exploring the Regularity of Automorphic Distributions in Holomorphic Modular Forms

This workshop by Stephen Miller and Wilfried Schmid delves into the regularity of automorphic distributions, specifically in relation to holomorphic modular forms and their connections to functions like the Riemann/Weierstrass non-differentiable function. The talk highlights historical claims around non-differentiability and showcases the significance of such functions in calculus and fractals. Key topics include the q-function, automorphy explanations for replication, and the characteristics of antiderivatives for various cusp forms. A fascinating exploration of mathematical structures and behavior awaits.

ketan
Télécharger la présentation

Exploring the Regularity of Automorphic Distributions in Holomorphic Modular Forms

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Regularity of Automorphic Distributions_______________________CRM Workshop May 3, 2004Stephen Miller (Rutgers University)Wilfried Schmid (Harvard University)

  2. The original example: Riemann/Weierstrass “Non-differentiable Function” • Historical claim: f(x) is non-differentiable at all real x ! • Hardy(1916): proven for almost all x • Gerver (1970) disproven! • f’(x) = - p for x = 2p/q, p and q odd.

  3. Graph of Riemann’s Function (Influential in the development of calculus) Note replication • (Sidenote) Mandelbrot: The “crisis” caused by this function launched fractals.

  4. What does this have to do with automorphic forms? f’(x) is essentially the q-function restricted to the real axis which exists as an automorphic distribution. This automorphy explains the replication. In fact Gerver’s points x=2p/q are the orbit of x=1/2 under G0(4) and q is cuspidal in exactly this of the three cusps (0,1/2,∞) of G0(4)\H

  5. Automorphic Distributions of holomorphic modular forms In general start with a q-expansion Restrict to x-axis The distribution F inherits automorphy from t :

  6. Regularity of Automorphic Distributions For holomorphic cusp forms of weight one (and Maass forms…), t is the first anti-derivative of a continuous function whose Hölder properties can be nearly-exactly characterized.

  7. Weight one antiderivative for Gamma_0(23) This is the image in the complex plane of the antiderivative’s values on the real line

  8. Cruder View

  9. Maass Form Antiderivative

  10. Zoom near origin

  11. Weight one antiderivative

More Related