1 / 18

Pelatihan : Techniques in Active Tectonic Study Juni 20-Juli 2, 2013

Pelatihan : Techniques in Active Tectonic Study Juni 20-Juli 2, 2013 Instruktur: Prof. J Ramon Arrowsmith (JRA) Dari Arizona State University (ASU) - US. Tempat Pelaksanaan:

khanh
Télécharger la présentation

Pelatihan : Techniques in Active Tectonic Study Juni 20-Juli 2, 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pelatihan : Techniques in Active Tectonic Study Juni 20-Juli 2, 2013 Instruktur: Prof. J Ramon Arrowsmith (JRA) Dari Arizona State University (ASU) - US Tempat Pelaksanaan: Ruang Pangea, Laboratorium Gempabumi (LabEarth) – Puslit Geoteknologi LIPI dan Kuliah lapangan akan dilakukan disekitar Sesar Lembang, Jawa Barat. * Lebih jelas baca TOR/KAK dan daftar acara

  2. L'Aquila earthquake and verdict Jordan, et al., 2011; http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/5350/5371

  3. Accumulated links Operational Earthquake Forecasting – State of Knowledge and Guidelines for Utilization - ICEF report http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/5350/5371 News reports: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/europe/2012/10/20121022151851442575.html http://www.livescience.com/24173-laquila-earthquake-manslaughter-verdict-condemned.html Tom Jordan gave a very good interview on NPR: http://www.npr.org/2012/10/23/163499530/italian-seismologists-convicted-of-manslaughter Time Magazine: http://world.time.com/2012/10/24/the-aquila-earthquake-verdict-where-the-guilt-may-really-lie/ Scientific journal and blog commentary: Nature: http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110914/full/477264a.html Trembling Earth blog: http://tremblingearth.wordpress.com/2012/10/23/conviction-of-italian-seismologists-a-nuanced-warning/ Highly Allochthonous blog: http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2009/04/foreshocks-and-aftershocks-of-the-italian-earthquake/ Statements: Joint statement from the British Royal Society and National Academy of Sciences: http://www.nasonline.org/news-and-multimedia/news/2012_10_25_Joint_Statement_NAS-RS_Italian_Earthquake_Scientists.html AAAS had issued a statement earlier in the trial - and they may be considering an update: http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2010/media/0630italy_letter.pdf AGU, GSA and EGU have released statements: http://www.agu.org/news/press/pr_archives/2012/2012-46.shtml http://www.geosociety.org/news/pr/12-76.htm http://www.egu.eu/inside-egu/divisions-and-present-officers/division-seismology/home.html

  4. Some papers and reports Chiaraluce, et al. The anatomy of the 2009 L’Aquila normal fault system… JGR, 2011 http://www.agu.org/journals/jb/jb1112/2011JB008352/2011JB008352.pdf EERI report on the earthquake: https://www.eeri.org/site/images/lfe/pdf/laquila-eq-report.pdf …there are many more

  5. The seismicity Chiaraluce, et al. The anatomy of the 2009 L’Aquila normal fault system… JGR, 2011

  6. http://www.haisentitoilterremoto.it/repository/2206496920/index.htmlhttp://www.haisentitoilterremoto.it/repository/2206496920/index.html Felt reports of L’Aquila main shock

  7. Seismicity sequence http://all-geo.org/highlyallochthonous/2009/04/foreshocks-and-aftershocks-of-the-italian-earthquake/

  8. Chiaraluce, et al. The anatomy of the 2009 L’Aquila normal fault system… JGR, 2011

  9. Chiaraluce, et al. The anatomy of the 2009 L’Aquila normal fault system… JGR, 2011

  10. Spatial and temporal evolution of the foreshock sequence Chiaraluce, et al. The anatomy of the 2009 L’Aquila normal fault system… JGR, 2011

  11. Serial cross sections through the seismicity show activation of mostly west dipping Appenine/Abruzzofaults Chiaraluce, et al. The anatomy of the 2009 L’Aquila normal fault system… JGR, 2011

  12. Time independent earthquake forecast for Italy based on instrumental and historic seismicity and paleoseismology. Jordan, et al., 2011; http://www.annalsofgeophysics.eu/index.php/annals/article/view/5350/5371 probabilistic seismic hazard map for Italy: ground acceleration with a 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years

  13. Lessons of L'Aquila for Operational Earthquake Forecasting Presented by Tom Jordan, Director of the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) and the W.M. Keck Foundation Professor of Earth Sciences at USC http://www.seismosoc.org/italy/ OEF (10:20-11:50): -Continual updating of authoritative information about future occurrence of potentially damaging earthquakes -The officially sanctioned dissemination of this information to enhance earthquake preparedness in threatened communities Earthquake probabilities -Probabilities of large earthquakes (even in areas of high seismicity) are low <<1%/day -High gain-low probability situations (100-1000x)

  14. Lessons of L'Aquila for Operational Earthquake Forecasting • Presented by Tom Jordan, Director of the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) and the W.M. Keck Foundation Professor of Earth Sciences at USC • http://www.seismosoc.org/italy/ • L’Aquila (12:40-14:20) • -probability of a false alarm > failure to predict (100x) • -seismic activity had increased probability of a large event by ~100x • -Scientists enticed into addressing a simple yes-no question (“will we be hit by a large earthquake?”) • -Reassuring statements widely interpreted to be an anti-alarm

  15. Lessons of L'Aquila for Operational Earthquake Forecasting • Presented by Tom Jordan, Director of the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) and the W.M. Keck Foundation Professor of Earth Sciences at USC • http://www.seismosoc.org/italy/ • Recommendations (14:20-16:49) • -Separate role of scientific advisors (objective information about natural hazards) from that of civil decision makers (weigh benefits of protective actions with costs of false alarms, other political considerations) • -Use probabilistic rather than deterministic statements in characterizing short term changes in seismic hazards (e.g. meteorological community)

  16. Membership: Dr. Terry Tullis, Chair Brown University Dr. Ramon Arrowsmith Arizona State University Dr. Nick Beeler USGS, Menlo Park, California Dr. David Jackson University of California, Los Angeles Dr. Bruce Shaw Columbia University Dr. William Ellsworth USGS, Menlo Park, California Dr. Evelyn Roeloffs USGS, Vancouver, Washington Dr. John Vidale University of Washington Also, CEPEC: California Earthquake Prediction Evaluation Council Dr. Andrew Michael USGS, Menlo Park, California Dr. Allan Rubin Princeton University Roland Burgmann University of California, Berkeley Dr. Bill Leith, Co-chair, ex officio Senior Science Advisor for Earthquake and Geologic Hazards and Coordinator, Earthquake Hazards Program USGS, Reston, Virginia Dr. Michael Blanpied, Executive Secretary Associate Coordinator, Earthquake Hazards Program USGS, Reston, Virginia

  17. statement regarding California’s Immunity from Liability for Earthquake Predictions 955.1. The science of earthquake prediction is developing rapidly and, although still largely in a research stage, such predictions are now being initiated and are certain to continue into the future… It is the intent of this legislation to ensure that such actions are taken in the public interest by government agencies acting in a responsible manner without fear of consequent financial liabilities. -from John Parrish, California State Geologist 

  18. statement regarding California’s Immunity from Liability for Earthquake Predictions The state and its agencies and employees shall not be liable for any injury resulting from the issuance or non-issuance of a warning pursuant to this subdivision or for any acts or omissions in fact gathering, evaluation, or other activities leading up to the issuance or non-issuance of a warning. -from John Parrish, California State Geologist 

More Related