1 / 22

Tracy L. Thompson Executive Director NELLCO tracy.thompson@yale 603-357-3385

Tracy L. Thompson Executive Director NELLCO tracy.thompson@yale.edu 603-357-3385. Next Generation Discovery. An Alternative to Traditional Federated Searching. Universal Search Solution Goal.

khoi
Télécharger la présentation

Tracy L. Thompson Executive Director NELLCO tracy.thompson@yale 603-357-3385

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tracy L. Thompson Executive Director NELLCO tracy.thompson@yale.edu 603-357-3385

  2. Next Generation Discovery An Alternative to Traditional Federated Searching

  3. Universal Search Solution Goal Build, in a collaborative environment, a one-box search application that will allow legal researchers to find relevant content (as defined by collection development standards), both print and electronic, with a single search query and without reference to the OPAC or A-Z list as starting points.

  4. Federated Search and NELLCO • 2004 Reference Interest Group – BU • Why do our users need federated search? • Our users go to Westlaw, Lexis and Google (the ‘anchors’)

  5. The Information ‘Mall’

  6. Federated Search and NELLCO • 2004 Reference Interest Group – BU • Why do our users need federated search? • Our users go to Westlaw, Lexis and Google (the ‘anchors’) • Miss out on ‘boutique’ resources • Current discovery (out)mode is through OPACs and A-Z lists • We need to steer researchers to relevant resources • Enhance scholarship • Justify budgets

  7. Fed Search Paradigm • Real-time search across multiple databases • User enters search string • Search is broadcast to ALL associated databases, regardless of content • Search string is translated into native search language • Search results are delivered as they are retrieved

  8. Federated Search

  9. Problems with the Paradigm • Excessive/unnecessary vendor server traffic – scattershot approach • Search may not translate as expected • Difficulty ranking – first-in-time delivery • Difficulty de-duping • Skewed usage statistics

  10. An Alternative Approach • FPLC committee began exploring enterprise search technology • Developed for fortune 500 companies • Intended for searching proprietary content • Examples • Google’s GSA • Thunderstone’s Enterprise Search Appliance • Vivisimo • Endeca

  11. Enterprise Search Paradigm • Host creates local index of content • Searcher enters search string • Search is run against the index • Search results are displayed • Results link to content, not index

  12. Enterprise Search

  13. The Vision • Enterprise search applied across ALL electronic content sources • OPAC • Third-party (paid) resources • Free web • Internal datasets • Keep the librarian involved in collection development/selection • Harness NELLCO’s leverage/vendor relationships?

  14. Publisher Benefits? More relevant exposure for their content Reduced server traffic Representative usage stats

  15. Money • 2007 – Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) National Leadership Grant - $374k • 1 to 1 matching required • 2 year grant period - 12/07-11/09 • Project total @$850k

  16. Technical Expertise • Open source solution • Development Partner – IndexData – Danish-based library solution developer

  17. Human Resources • Project Coordinator – Carl Grant • NELLCO ED and Admin. Assist. • Project Committee – • Chaired by Roberta Woods (FPLC) • Members appointed by Directors • 10% time commitment over two years • 5 members represent library types • Grad. intern from Syracuse • Participating member libraries • Participating vendor/publishers

  18. The Plan • Secure vendor and member commitments • Develop best practices – cookbooks • Develop interfaces • one box GUI (but advanced search will be supported) • Admin. interfaces • Design by committee

  19. The Plan • Develop authentication scheme • Two layers • Authenticate the user to the index (NELLCO) • Identifies user for correct resource ‘menu’ • Authenticate the user to the resource (Vendor or library) • Identifies user as authorized user of content

  20. The Plan • Build the index – OAI-PMH protocol • OPACs • Local content • Free web resources vetted by members • Subscription/fee-based resources • 20 vendors during proof of concept phase • 5 currently committed • Commitments required by 4/1/08

  21. The Plan • Launch beta by end of 08 • Evaluate • Troubleshoot and modify • Evaluate • Grant period ends 11/09 • Proof of concept = sustainability?

  22. Thank you! Questions? tracy.thompson@yale.edu 603-357-3385

More Related