1 / 17

Virtual Compaction in Emery Berger's Research at University of Massachusetts Amherst

Explore the impact of Virtual Compaction on memory management, particularly its role in enhancing memory leak tolerance for C++ applications. Discover how this technique, researched by Berger and his team, holds promise for improving garbage collection effectiveness and memory allocation efficiency. This study delves into the segregation of the heap and the mixed outcomes seen with the approach. Dive into the world of Wild and Crazy VMs and the potential benefits and drawbacks of virtual compaction in the realm of memory management.

kiet
Télécharger la présentation

Virtual Compaction in Emery Berger's Research at University of Massachusetts Amherst

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Virtual Compaction Emery Berger University of Massachusetts Amherst TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before you delete this box.: AAAAA

  2. Segregated Heap

  3. Awesome

  4. Awful

  5. If Only…

  6. If Only…

  7. If Only…

  8. But…

  9. Back to Awful

  10. But Wait…

  11. Wild and Crazy VM

  12. Wild and Crazy VM

  13. Wild and Crazy VM

  14. Virtual Compaction

  15. Bad

  16. Good

  17. Conclusion • Virtual compaction part of “Plug” • memory leak tolerance for C++ • [Novark, Berger, Zorn] – in preparation • Not yet part of general-purpose allocator • Good for GC?

More Related