1 / 66

NORTHEAST CORRIDOR INFRASTRUCTURE (NECI) BICYCLE FACILITIES STUDY 1 st Public Meeting 01.18.2011

in collaboration with: + STV/Ralph Whitehead Associates. NORTHEAST CORRIDOR INFRASTRUCTURE (NECI) BICYCLE FACILITIES STUDY 1 st Public Meeting 01.18.2011. Agenda. Introductions Project Understanding/Process Overview Presentation of Facility Types and Case Studies Existing Conditions

kita
Télécharger la présentation

NORTHEAST CORRIDOR INFRASTRUCTURE (NECI) BICYCLE FACILITIES STUDY 1 st Public Meeting 01.18.2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. in collaboration with: + STV/Ralph Whitehead Associates NORTHEAST CORRIDOR INFRASTRUCTURE (NECI) BICYCLE FACILITIES STUDY1st Public Meeting01.18.2011

  2. Agenda • Introductions • Project Understanding/Process Overview • Presentation of Facility Types and Case Studies • Existing Conditions • Facilitated Discussion/Break Out Groups • Vision for Bike Facilities • Goals/objectives for facility types & users • Opportunities/Constraints • Outreach • General Questions/Next Steps • Process/Schedule, etc.

  3. Introductions • Joe Frey, EP&M, Project Mgr. • Ken Tippette, Bike Program Mgr. • Jim Keenan, NECI PM • Kathy Cornett, Planning • Dick Winters, Mecklenburg County • Stakeholder Group • John Cock & Maya Agarwal, Alta Planning + Design • Scot Sibert, STV/RWA

  4. City of Charlotte • Involved Organizations • CABA • BAC • Neighborhood Groups • UNCC • Charlotte Bike Commuters • University City Partners • Carolina Thread Trail • Etc. • Public Agencies • Charlotte Engineering & PM • CDOT • Planning • CATS • County Park & Recreation • NCDOT • CMU Alta Planning + Design Bicycle facility planning and design Project management Stakeholder Engagement Public Involvement STV/RWA Public Involvement Conceptual design Engineering Review Stakeholder engagement (NCDOT, Railroads, CATS) Project Team and Partners

  5. Overview of NECI project • (NECI = Northeast Corridor Infrastructure) • Voter approved bond funding • Multi-modal access improvements • Supporting economic development goals • Highest needs in station areas, with some focus on corridor connectivity • Public input process upcoming • No implementation yet

  6. Project Purpose “. . .generate a long term vision plan for corridor-length (Uptown to UNCC/University City Area) bicycling routes and facilities . . ..”

  7. Alta: leaders in bike/ped/trail planning Experience in planning bike facilities in RR ROW Implementation of 5,000+ miles bikeways & walkways STV: NE Corridor LRT lead engineering firm On-going relationships with railroads SCIP & other City plan and implementation Consultant Team: Alta & STV

  8. Mecklenburg County Park & Recreation Charlotte Center City Partners UNCC Cyclists CATS Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department Charlotte Economic Development Department Bicycle Advisory Committee Mecklenburg County Safe Routes To School Program Stakeholder Group • Carolina Thread Trail • YMCA • University City Partners • UNCC • Bike Shop Owners (Bike Line, Espada) • Charlotte Bike Commuter Group • Charlotte Area Bicycle Alliance • North End Partners • Greenways Advisory Committee

  9. Stakeholder Meeting (Sept.)

  10. “Someday we’ll look back on this and it will all seem funny. . .” http://everythingisjaded.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/fat_american_walking_dog_from_car.jpg

  11. Major Questions • Vision for corridor? • Design users? • Facility types? • Destinations? • Routes? • Other considerations?

  12. Types of Cyclists(Which category are you?) A B C D • A - Strong and fearless (<1%) • Will ride regardless of facilities.Often ride long distances. • B - Enthused and confident (7%) • Comfortable in traffic with appropriate facilities. • C - Interested but concerned (60%) • Not comfortable in traffic. Prefer low-volume, low-speed conditions (neighborhood streets, off-street). • D - No way, no how (33%)

  13. Who are “design” cyclists? Strong and fearless Enthused and confident “No way, no how” Interested but concerned

  14. How do we attract “Interested but Concerned”? Develop Facilities and a Network that focuses on: • Comfort • (incl. minimize complexity) • safety • attractiveness • direct routes • connected system (Dutch design principles)

  15. Types of Bikeways • Bike Lane • Cycle Tracks • Signed Shared Roadway • Wide outside lane • Bicycle Boulevard/Bike Route • Multi-Use Path • Rail-with-Trail • Shoulder Bikeway • Bike/Ped Connectivity

  16. Bicycle Lane (Photo: City of Charlotte)

  17. Beyond Bike Lanes. . . 13

  18. Buffered Bike Lane

  19. Cycletrack 17

  20. Shared Roadways • Wide outside lanes • Other unique solutions (Shared Lane Markings) • Calm traffic • Alternate routes (Photo: City of Charlotte)

  21. Shared Roadways • Most common type of bikeway: Appropriate on 85% of streets in a city • Great for getting around neighborhoods: low speed, low volume • Not as practical for longer distances

  22. Shared Roadways: “Quiet Streets” Bentonville, Arkansas Portland, Oregon

  23. Multi-use Pathways/Trails

  24. Multi-use Pathways/Trails (Photo: City of Charlotte)

  25. Sidepaths E. Faris Road; Greenville Tech Trail (Photo: City of Greenville)

  26. Bike/Ped Connections Photo: City of Charlotte, NC

  27. Case Studies and Examples NECI Bicycle Facilities Study

  28. 14.2 mile Bus Rapid Transit corridor Dedicated lane built on a former rail right-of-way 14-mile bike path and 8-mile pedestrian walkway 79% of riders utilizing these facilities to get to their bus stop Bicycle facilities within and outside of the rail right-of-way Metro Orange Line, Los Angeles

  29. Under construction (Phase 1) LA to Culver City Planned series of paths, bikeways, and bike routes along future LRT corridor Exposition LRT Line: Los Angeles (FTA grants can be used for bicycle/ped facilities and access to transit: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/bkepedtble.htm)

  30. Parallels Hiawatha LRT line 12 mile LRT line The intersection of Midtown Greenway and Hiawatha Trail sees 4,000 users per day.* Hiawatha Trail, Minneapolis *Source: Shaw, J. and Steve Moler. Bicyclist- and Pedestrian-Only Roundabouts. Federal Highway Administration: Public Roads. Jan/Feb 2009.

  31. Path built in 70’s with interstate LRT came later Currently, upgrading path TriMet has adopted motto: “when you can’t bike the whole way, take TriMet” Portland: 1-205/Max Path *Source: Portland Platinum Bicycle Master Plan, Existing Conditions Report: Bicycling and Transit Integration. 2007

  32. Complements Green Line rapid transit subway and sections of commuter rail Combination of: separated path, on-street designated bikeway, and on-street recommended bike route Connection to Boston College Commonwealth Avenue, Boston

  33. Grade-separated Crossings • When a grade crossing between a trail and street may not be desirable: • Traffic > 25,000 vehicles/day • Speeds > 45 mph • Motorists typically will cross at grade; trail routed over or under the roadway Grade-separated undercrossing

  34. Trail/Cedar Lake Regional Trail, Minneapolis Bassett Creek Trail/Cedar Lake Regional Trail, Minneapolis 34

  35. Eastbank Esplanade, Portland Eastbank Esplanade, Portland 35

  36. Existing Conditions/Planned Facilities

  37. Previous Planning Efforts Recommendations • Centers, Corridors, and Wedges Growth Framework • City Transportation Action Plan • Charlotte Bicycle Plan • County Greenway Plan Update • CTT Alignments for Mecklenburg • Charlotte Connectivity Study • NCDOT Planned Projects • Planned Rail Facility Projects • Northeast Area Plan (2000) • Eastside Strategy Plan (2001) • North Charlotte Area Plan (1995) • Newell Area Plan (2002) • Belmont Area Plan (2003) • North Tryon Area Plan (2010) • Optimist Park Plan (2002) • Rocky River Road Area Plan (2006) • University City Area Plan (2007) • University Research Park Area Plan (2010) • UNCC Campus Plan (Draft 2009)

  38. Obstacles/Challenges Structures/grade separations N. Tryon: daunting bike environment Multiple RRs (5) Railroads’ expectations NCDOT expectations Overview: Challenges

  39. Opportunities Potential partners along the corridor Tie into greenways Tie to neighborhood/area plans Bike/ped access to stations Preliminary Opportunities

  40. Existing/Proposed Facilities • Blue Line Extension

  41. Existing/Proposed Facilities • Blue Line Extension • Existing Greenways

  42. Existing/Proposed Facilities • Blue Line Extension • Existing Greenways • Proposed Greenways

  43. Existing/Proposed Facilities • Blue Line Extension • Existing Greenways • Proposed Greenways • Existing Bike Lanes

  44. Existing/Proposed Facilities • Blue Line Extension • Existing Greenways • Proposed Greenways • Existing Bike Lanes • Proposed Bike Lanes and Striped Shoulders

  45. Existing/Proposed Facilities • Blue Line Extension • Existing Greenways • Proposed Greenways • Existing Bike Lanes • Proposed Bike Lanes, Striped Shoulders, and Shared Lane Markings

  46. Existing/Proposed Facilities • Blue Line Extension • Existing Greenways • Proposed Greenways • Existing Bike Lanes • Proposed Bike Lanes, Striped Shoulders, Shared Lane Markings, and Shared Neighborhood Roadways

  47. Existing/Proposed Facilities • Blue Line Extension • Existing Greenways • Proposed Greenways • Existing Bike Lanes • Proposed Bike Lanes, Striped Shoulders, Shared Lane Markings, and Shared Neighborhood Roadways • Proposed CTT

  48. Regional greenway and trail system Connecting 15 Counties 11 NC Counties, 4 SC Counties Estimated 2.3 million people Carolina Thread Trail

  49. Break out Groups

  50. Breakout Instructions • Introduce selves and location on corridor • Review map markings, legend • Answer questions on handouts in group discussion • Allow everyone to speak • Mark on maps and take notes • Report back

More Related