1 / 19

Personalized System for Instruction

Personalized System for Instruction. “Students Progress as Fast as They Can, or as Slowly as They Need” By: Christina Thom and Michael Boyd. History of PSI. Program was developed by Fred Keller Colleague of Skinner Experimental behavioral physiologist Also worked with Sherman (1974)

kneuman
Télécharger la présentation

Personalized System for Instruction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Personalized System for Instruction “Students Progress as Fast as They Can, or as Slowly as They Need” By: Christina Thom and Michael Boyd

  2. History of PSI • Program was developed by Fred Keller • Colleague of Skinner • Experimental behavioral physiologist • Also worked with Sherman (1974) • Known as “Goodbye Teacher!” (1968) • Also known as “Keller Plan”

  3. Rationale • PSI is based on 4 features and it provides students with reinforcement • 1. The ability to view creative and interesting learning materials • 2. Regular tangible progress toward the course goals • 3. Immediate assessment of learning • 4. Individual attention from the instructor

  4. Major Theme for PSI • Provides each student with a complete set of instructional materials. • Including- • Management information • Task presentations • Task structures • Learning activities • Error analyses • Assessments

  5. PSI • Students proceed through a sequence of learning activities. • Complete each one to the stated performance criterion before moving on. • Students progress at their own pace.

  6. Key Aspects to PSI • Go-at-your-own-pace • Unit-perfection requirement • Lectures and demonstrations for motivation • Stress on the written word for teacher-student communication • Tutoring/proctoring

  7. Domains of PSI • A decidedly mastery in achievement based instructional model. • Learning domains- • First priority: Psychomotor learning • Second priority: Cognitive learning • Third priority: Affective learning

  8. PSI Workbooks • Attendance policies • Class rules and disciplinary plan • Dressing-out policies • How to get and return equipment • Grading plan and applicable policies • Procedures for starting class • Learning tasks & criteria • Required readings • Progress charts

  9. Teacher Skills • Planning • Time & Class Management • Task Presentation & Structure • Communication • Instructional Information • Review & Closure

  10. Student Requirements • Reading • Technology • Personal Responsibility • Asking for Help

  11. Teacher/Student Roles • Starting Class • Bringing equipment to class • Dispersing and returning equipment • Role call • Task presentation • Task structure • Assessment • Monitoring learning progress

  12. Students work on their own • How does it work? • The student: • Tells the teacher which task they are ready to begin • Gets the materials & reviews the task • Reads or views a presentation of the task • Pictures, Videos • Practices the task

  13. Tasks Included: • Readiness Drills • Comprehension Tasks • Criterion Tasks • Challenge Tasks • Quizzes • Games

  14. PSI Provides Inclusion • Students work at their OWN pace • Nobody is “left behind” • Teacher-student interactions • Students can take as many attempts as needed to master the skill and pass the skill test

  15. Goals • To provide individualized instruction • Allow each student to progress at his or her own pace • To encourage students to become independent learners • Students who need help get more interaction with teacher in order to improve

  16. Pros of PSI • Students work at own pace • Social interactions with students & teachers • Assess themselves • Inclusion • Independent • More responsibility • Self Learning • Students can teach others

  17. Cons of PSI • Lacks teacher demonstrations/presentations • Advanced students don’t get as much interaction with teacher • No lesson plans involved • Could cause chaos • Students could get off-task • Pressure on students • Competitiveness

  18. Questions??

  19. Bibliography • http://www.edtech.vt.edu/edtech/id/models/psi.html • http://ww2.lafayette.edu/~allanr/concerns.html • http://ww2.lafayette.edu/~allanr/gallup.html • http://www.unh.edu/pff/seminar/methinstruct/psi.htm • http://www.unl.edu/speech/comm109/Files/Lectures/Day1/slide5.html • http://www.personal.psu.edu/students/w/x/wxh139/PSI.htm • “Instructional Models for Physical Education” Michael W. Metzler

More Related