1 / 6

Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre Finnish Environment Institute

Dilemma of Boundaries in the Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Finnish Experiences from the Public Consultations. Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre Finnish Environment Institute. Boundaries uniting and separating. Implementation of the MSFD in Finland.

knoton
Télécharger la présentation

Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre Finnish Environment Institute

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dilemma of Boundaries in the Implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework DirectiveFinnish Experiences from the Public Consultations Juha-Markku Leppänen Marine Research Centre Finnish Environment Institute

  2. Boundaries uniting and separating

  3. Implementation of the MSFD in Finland • Main responsibility: the Ministry of Environment in cooperation with the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Ministry of Traffic and Communication; • To be adopted by the Council of the State; • Implementation assisted by the Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment located at coastal areas and governmental research institutes; • Basically same administrational structures as created for the WFD to be used; • Specific Coordination and Expert Groups to carry out the practical work • Åland Island, as the autonomous region, makes its own marine strategy, which will be a part of the Finnish one

  4. Public Consultation • In “Main Finland” between 16 April and 15 May • In Finnish and Swedish • Åland Island organized its own regional consultation • Divided into the countrywide consultation and the regional ones • The Ministry of Environment requested opinions of other ministries, governmental institutions and countrywide stakeholder • The Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment took care of the consultation in their districts • directed mainly to municipalities and local stakeholders • The consultation document was publicly available in the Internet for anyone to comment

  5. Dilemma of boundaries • The importance of a marine strategy was not questioned! • Boundaries between the Directives • Many comments were related to the significant water management issues of the WFD • The added value of the MSFD in the coastal area was questioned • Administrative boundaries • Cooperation within national administrational sectors still ambiguous • Regional state administrative bodies are quite independent • Boundaries between the sectors • The proposed marine strategy either too weak or too ambitious • Geographic boundaries • Need for transboundary coordination not understood • Coastal-open sea boundary confusing • One marine strategy vs. river basins difficult • Local problems vs. GES • Spatial scope

  6. Summary • The responses received from ministries, central organisations and stakeholders mainly well structured. • The general public touched mainly very local and even personal topics and responses were “unstructured”. Recommendations • Public consultations for the MSFD and the WFD should be carried out at the same time. • Different stakeholders should be better take into account when preparing the consultation material e.g. for general public a structured electronic questionnaire should be developed. • “Advertisement” needed

More Related