1 / 19

KE22 Final Year Project Phase 2

KE22 Final Year Project Phase 2. Modeling and Simulation of Milling Forces SIMTech Project. Ryan Soon, Henry Woo, Yong Boon April 9, 2011 Confidential – Internal Only. Problem Description. 3 set of cutter tool data were given 07, 31, T12

konala
Télécharger la présentation

KE22 Final Year Project Phase 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. KE22 Final Year ProjectPhase 2 Modeling and Simulation of Milling Forces SIMTech Project Ryan Soon, Henry Woo, Yong Boon April 9, 2011 Confidential – Internal Only

  2. Problem Description • 3 set of cutter tool data were given • 07, 31, T12 • Belong to the same family type but with differences in drill bit shape and knife edges • Problem domain requires us to build a hybrid KE system to predict the cutter tool wear • Full Microsoft .NET C# implementation of Hybrid KE system • Hierarchical Clustering • Derive number of Fuzzy linguistic values for each variable • Derive number of Fuzzy rules • ANFIS (Neural Fuzzy System) to learn and predict the tool wear • Generic tool wear prediction model

  3. Data Correlation analysis – 1 • And within each cutter tool data • 3 sets of individual tool head data  F1, F2, F3 • Within each “F” data (315 records) • Acoustic emission data (16 features) • Force (x dimension) data (16 features) • Force (y dimension) data (16 features) • Force (y dimension) data (16 features) • Too much features • Use correlation coefficient method and cut down on the features

  4. Data Correlation analysis – 2 AE Fx Fy Fz • By using Pearson Correlation Coefficients, the linear dependence between the measured features values and the tool wear values can be calculated • AE data is not influencing the tool wear strongly • The top influencing features are consistent between the 3 forces

  5. Fuzzy System Identification

  6. Overview of Hierarchical Clustering • Agglomerative HC starts with each object describing a cluster, and then combines them into more inclusive clusters until only one cluster remains. • 4 Main Steps • Construct the finest partition • Compute the distance matrix • DO • Find the clusters with the closest distance • Put those two clusters into one cluster • Compute the distances between the new groups and the remaining groups by recalculated distance to obtain a reduced distance matrix • UNTIL all clusters are agglomerated into one group. • Ward Methods, minimize ESS (Error Sum-Of-Square)

  7. Overview of ANFIS • ANFIS architecture • Premise ANFIS MF(Bell) • Consequence Linear Sugeno • Learning Algorithms

  8. Optimal Hierarchical Clustering • Determine the numbers of clustering using RSS with penalty. Where, is the penalty factor for addition # of cluster. K’ and K = number of clusters RSS = Residual Sum of Squares • Borrow concept from K-means using RSS as goal function.

  9. Hierarchical Clustering + ANFIS • Two Different Approaches for HC + ANFIS • Use HC to determine # of linguistic values for each input features • Use HC to determine # of rules

  10. Optimal Hierarchical Clustering# of Linguistic Variables • Example on SRE variables, opt # of cluster = 3 • Perform HC on selected features on FX

  11. ANFIS Architectures# of Linguistic Variables • ANFIS with 4 inputs variables contains 3~4 linguistics variables generated 192 Rules!

  12. ANFIS – Results# of Linguistic Variables • ANFIS Predict vs Actual • Train Data with Avg Error 4.84 • Test Data with Avg Error 15.00 • Membership Functions • P2p • Std_fea • Sre • fstd

  13. Optimal Hierarchical Clustering# of Rules • Build HC on all variables, opt # of cluster = 5

  14. ANFIS Architectures # of Rules • ANFIS with 4 inputs variables contains 5 linguistics variables and 5 rules. • Each cluster centre is a fuzzy rules!

  15. ANFIS – Results # of Rules • ANFIS Predict vs Actual • Train Data with Avg Error 5.75 • Test Data with Avg Error 15.218 • Membership Functions • P2p • Std_fea • Sre • fstd

  16. What’s next? • Full .NET C# Implementation • Development of Hierarchical Clustering toolset with frontend GUI • Manual range input of number cluster by user • Optimal clustering suggesting the optimal number of cluster • Make use of ANFIS model to evaluate • GUI engine for cluster center drawing • Development of ANFIS toolset with frontend GUI • Develop the ANFIS Engine which will do the optimization • Develop User Interface for: • Display predicted tool-wear result • Evaluation of error

  17. The End Demo

  18. The End Q&A

  19. BACKUP

More Related