Standards for Science Metrics, Classifications, and Mapping

Jan 06, 2026

90 likes | 213 Vues

This document explores the standards for science metrics and the classification of scholarly communication as governed by socio-cognitive and institutional dynamics. It highlights three primary changes: shifting socio-political regimes, global socio-cognitive transformations, and local institutional arrangements. The study discusses the dynamics of journal evaluation and citation analysis, introducing integrated impact indicators and fractional counting for field normalization. Conclusions emphasize the shift from descriptive statistics to hypothesis testing, utilizing nonparametric statistics for citation distribution analysis, alongside measures for assessing interdisciplinarity.

konane

Télécharger la présentation

Standards for Science Metrics, Classifications, and Mapping

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

Standards for Science Metrics, Classifications, and Mapping Loet Leydesdorff University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) http://www.leydesdorff.net
Socio-cognitive horizons input; steering Scientific enterprise; scholars; institutions x
Three dynamics: • Changes in socio-political regimes (national? European?); • Changes in socio-cognitive regimes (at the global level?); • Changes in institutional arrangments (locally). OECD; NSB The dynamics of journals Evaluation; citation analysis
Standards for journal maps

Integrated Impact Indicator + fractional counting of citations for field normalization
Conclusions • From descriptive statistics to significance testing; • Use nonparametric statistics for skewed citation distributions; • Integrated Impact Indicator (I3); Rao-Stirling Diversity measure for interdisciplinarity; • Test observed against expected!