1 / 14

Panel Discussion on Interdisciplinary Team Teaching

Join Dr. Lynn Bradley and Elizabeth Mackie as they explore the integration of chemistry and art in their groundbreaking interdisciplinary courses. Through hands-on activities, field trips, and collaborative projects, students experience the dynamic relationship between these two disciplines. This panel discussion highlights successes, challenges, and lessons learned in developing writing-intensive curricula that inspire creativity and foster deep understanding. With a focus on improving assessments and enhancing student engagement, discover how art and science can coalesce to enrich educational experiences.

kort
Télécharger la présentation

Panel Discussion on Interdisciplinary Team Teaching

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Panel Discussion on Interdisciplinary Team Teaching Dr. Lynn Bradley May 10, 2012

  2. The Dynamic Duo Lynn Bradley (Chemistry) Elizabeth Mackie (Art) FSP 141 – Chemistry of Art, Art of Chemistry (Fall 2010) FSP 141 – Photography, Metals and Dyes: The Chemistry of Creating Art (Fall 2011) Bradley

  3. Idea for the Course • NSF Workshop June 2009 (1 week), Millersville University “Chemistry in Art” • Both attended • Focus on art history and chemical topics Challenge: writing-intensive and integrate chemistry with fine arts Spent a year developing the course Bradley

  4. Year 1 – Fall 2010 • Shared a single section • 4 overall topics covered • 5 lab activities • Several assessments Need for Improvement: • Too many assessments • Not enough in-class writing, additional help required • Final project needed revision • More integrated approach • Hands-on activities key • Lack of literature Bradley

  5. Paper Making • Attracted a variety of students • Awareness of how chemistry and art relate • Excitement and personal experience to the course • Learned from each other Bradley

  6. Patina on Copper Bradley

  7. Patina on Copper Bradley

  8. FSP 141 – Fall 2010: Fiber Reactive Dyes Bradley

  9. Year 2 – Fall 2011 • Each had our own section • 4 to 3 topics • 3 hands-on activities • Added field trip to NY • Change in assessments (portfolios) • ARTStor and peer tutors added (Diane) • Objectives and assignments more clearly defined Bradley

  10. Indigo Dyeing and Fiber Reactive Dyes Bradley

  11. Indigo and Fiber Reactive Dyes Bradley

  12. Lessons Learned • Students need help with writing • Teach chemistry and art in context of topics • Less is more • Hands-on activities crucial to success • Time-intensive for instructors • Ideas to generate discussion Bradley

  13. Benefits of the Interdisciplinary Approach • Attracted a variety of students • Awareness of how chemistry and art relate • Excitement and personal experience to the course • Learned from each other • Students understand the value of other disciplines Bradley

  14. Future of the Course Exploring London Through the Eyes of Art and Chemistry Summer 2013 • AFA 203 – approved for Literary, Visual, and Performing Arts and Global • CHE 103 – approved for Natural Science and Global • Museums, field trips (Frogmore Mill, Henry Fox Talbot), sculpture gardens • Expanded art projects including a final “Map of London” Bradley

More Related