1 / 18

Computed Tomography (CT) Retrospective/Prospective

Computed Tomography (CT) Retrospective/Prospective. Radiation Protection and Control for New Applications of Existing Technology Robert M. Gagne, Ph.D. Office of Science and Technology. What are the objectives of the presentation?.

kosey
Télécharger la présentation

Computed Tomography (CT) Retrospective/Prospective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Computed Tomography (CT)Retrospective/Prospective Radiation Protection and Control for New Applications of Existing Technology Robert M. Gagne, Ph.D. Office of Science and Technology TEPRSSC 2000

  2. What are the objectives of the presentation? • Update on actions pertaining to Computed tomography fluoroscopy (CTF) • Take a retrospective look at CDRH activities in the CT arena • Take a prospective look at new applications of CT equipment • Identify any unique radiation protection and safety considerations TEPRSSC 2000

  3. CTF - Special Interest • Dose and imaging performance of computed tomography fluoroscopy (CTF) • new real time imaging application for existing technology (CT) • similarities between traditional interventional fluoroscopy and CTF • sensitize users to exposure levels and possibility of radiation injuries TEPRSSC 2000

  4. CTF - General Description • Continuous scans of a section of the patient • 50 seconds of CTF at 1 rotation per second • 50 rotations of x-ray tube about the patient • Cross-sectional images updated at a rate of 6-9 images per second • “real time” imaging • If no patient motion during procedure, one strip of skin gets the “full brunt” of the radiation exposure TEPRSSC 2000

  5. Entrance Dose CTF 1 - pre market submittal 2 - Nawfel et al, AAPM Annual Meeting (1998) na - not available TEPRSSC 2000

  6. X-Ray Fluoroscopy or X-Ray CT? • Applicability of requirements in Performance Standard • difficult, if not impossible, to fit to CTF • how to regulate appropriately? • Short and long term actions • in process • data gathering (NEXT 2000) • possible amendments to Performance Standard TEPRSSC 2000

  7. CT - Retrospective Look • Amendments to Performance Standard (21CFR1033, Sept 1985) • dose labeling in User Manual • performance criteria for light localizers and table increment • CT characteristics at the time • 10 mm slice thickness • contiguous scans and consecutive table increment TEPRSSC 2000

  8. CT - Axial Scanning(10 mm slice) X,Y Table motion after scan complete Tissue Imaged Volume TEPRSSC 2000

  9. CT - Retrospective Look • Relevance and adequacy of regulations for new applications of CT equipment • Helical or spiral CT • fast scanning technique • new technological considerations • New CT applications • CTF • angiography • multiphase contrast studies TEPRSSC 2000

  10. CT - Spiral Scan(10 mm slice, 2:1 pitch) X,Y Z Table Motion Tissue Imaged Volume TEPRSSC 2000

  11. CT - Prospective Look • Multi-slice spiral CT • fast volume scanning technique • renaissance in CT TEPRSSC 2000

  12. CT - Multi Slice Spiral Scan(2-10 mm slices, 1:1 pitch) X,Y Z Table Motion Tissue Imaged Volume TEPRSSC 2000

  13. State of the Art Images TEPRSSC 2000

  14. Radiation Protection and Safety • Relative contribution of CT to the dose per capita • Fraction of all radiological examinations (3-4 %) • 10 - 40 % of total dose contribution TEPRSSC 2000

  15. Radiation Protection and Safety TEPRSSC 2000

  16. Use, Education and Training • Selection of operating parameters • strong dependence on dose • User training and education • complicated equipment • analogy to interventional fluoroscopy • sensitivity to possible exposure levels • European approach • reference dose values and related guidelines TEPRSSC 2000

  17. Physical and Technical Aspects • Added filtration, shaped filters, detector technology • improvements by percent not factors • Automatic exposure control • low attenuation = low mAs • for example, pediatric vs adult patients • AP vs LAT projections within a scan • not available in CT TEPRSSC 2000

  18. Summary • Renaissance in CT • new applications with significant benefits • Have user and equipment programs kept up with changes? • Dose per capita significant • fertile area for dose improvement with an impact • Open for suggestions • not necessarily regulatory approaches TEPRSSC 2000

More Related