1 / 14

ECE 3110: Introduction to Digital Systems

ECE 3110: Introduction to Digital Systems. Multiple-outputs minimization Timing Hazards. Previous…. PoS minimization Don’t care values. Multiple-Output Minimization . Most digital applications require multiple outputs derived from the same input variables.

kourtney
Télécharger la présentation

ECE 3110: Introduction to Digital Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECE 3110: Introduction to Digital Systems Multiple-outputs minimization Timing Hazards

  2. Previous… • PoS minimization • Don’t care values

  3. Multiple-Output Minimization • Most digital applications require multiple outputs derived from the same input variables. • Example: 3 inputs and 2 outputs • Each output function could be minimized using K-map and realized independently. • The output functions could share one or more product terms (prime implicant) which reduces the total number of gates. X F1 Y Logic Circuit F2 Z

  4. Example • F1= XZ+YZ’ F2=XY’+YZ’ • To find the common terms multiply the two functions (F1.F2) • The common terms are : YZ’, XY’Z XY X XY X 00 01 11 10 Z 00 01 11 10 Z 0 2 6 4 0 2 6 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 3 7 5 1 3 7 5 1 1 Z Z 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 Y Y XY X Z 00 01 11 10 0 2 6 4 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 7 5 1 Z 0 0 0 1 Y

  5. Example - Logic Diagram • Independent realization Minimal realization F1= XZ+YZ’ F2= XY’+YZ’ F1 F1 X Y X F2 Z Y F2 Z

  6. Real-World Logic Design More than 6 inputs -- can’t use Karnaugh maps Design correctness more important than gate minimization Use “higher-level language” to specify logic operations Use programs to manipulate logic expressions and minimize logic. PALASM, ABEL, CUPL -- developed for PLDs VHDL, Verilog -- developed for ASICs

  7. Timing Hazards • The Truth Table determines the Steady State behavior of a Combinational Logic Circuit • Transient behavior: - Output could produce glitches (a short pulse) when input variables change.- Glitches occur when the paths between inputs and output have different delays.- Timing Hazards refer to the possibility of having glitches during input transitions. • Hazards :- Definitions.- Finding hazards. - Eliminating hazards.

  8. Definitions • Static Hazards:* Static-1 Hazard : Two input combinations that : - differ in only one variable . - both produce logic 1 . - possibly produce Logic 0 glitch during input variable transition * Static-0 Hazard : Two input combinations that - differ in only one variable - Both produce logic 0 - Possibly produce Logic 1 glitch during input variable transition • Dynamic hazards: - The output could change more than once during input transitions- Caused by multiple paths with different delays from input to the output 1 0 1 0

  9. X Y Z Z’ YZ XZ’ F glitch T Example • F= YZ+XZ’ • Delay in each gate is T . • Input changes from XYZ=111 to 110 Y F Z X

  10. Finding Timing hazards using K-map • Two-level AND-OR Circuits : • Static 0 hazards do not exist in the sum-of products (AND-OR) implementation. • Static 1 hazards are possible • The K-map of the function F in the previous example :- Cell 6 ( 110 ) and cell 7 ( 111 ) are covered in two product terms XY X Faster 00 01 11 10 Z Y 1 1 0 0 2 6 4 F Z 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 3 7 5 1 X 1 Z 0 1 1 0 Static 1 hazard Y

  11. Timing hazards in OR-AND circuits • Static 1 hazards do not exist in the Product-of sums (Two-level OR-AND) implementation. • Static 0 hazards are possible • The minimal product of F = ( X+Z)(Y+Z’)- Cell 0 ( 000 ) and cell 1 ( 001 ) are covered in two sum terms- Static 0 hazard occurs when inputs switched between 000 to 001 Faster XY X 00 01 11 10 X 0 0 1 Z F Z 0 1 0 2 6 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 Z Y 0 1 3 7 5 1 0 1 1 0 Static 0 hazard Y

  12. Eliminating Timing Hazards • AND-OR Circuit- Add a prime implicant that combines the two inputs that cause static 1 hazard.---->consensus- Cells 6 & 7 are combined : XY • The hazard-free circuit is : XY X 00 01 11 10 Z Y 1 1 0 0 2 6 4 0 0 1 1 1 F Z 1 0 1 1 3 7 5 1 Z 0 1 1 1 X 1 0 1 1 Y

  13. Eliminating Timing Hazards • OR-AND Circuit- Add a prime implicant that combines the two inputs that cause static 0 hazard.---->consensus- Cells 0 & 1 are combined : X+Y • The hazard-free circuit is : XY X 00 01 11 10 Z 0 2 6 4 X 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 F Z 0 1 0 Z 1 0 1 3 7 5 1 0 1 1 0 Y 0 0 Y

  14. Summary • A properly designed two-level SOP (AND-OR) circuit has no static-0 hazards. It may have static-1 hazards. • A properly designed two-level POS (OR-AND) circuit has no static-1 hazards. It may have static-0 hazards. • Dynamic hazards do not occur in a properly designed two-level AND-OR or OR-AND circuit. It may occur in multilevel circuits. • A brute-force method of obtaining a hazard-free realization is to use the complete sum or complete product. • Hazard analysis and elimination are typically needed in the design of asynchronous sequential circuits.

More Related