1 / 16

Hydraulics of Wetlands: Monitoring and Modeling Emily Spargo

Hydraulics of Wetlands: Monitoring and Modeling Emily Spargo. University of Wisconsin-Platteville REU Advisors: Drs. Kolar, Nairn, & Strevett. Report Overview. Wetland Hydrology. Tracer Test. Modeling. Conclusions. The Big Question.

kpalma
Télécharger la présentation

Hydraulics of Wetlands: Monitoring and Modeling Emily Spargo

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hydraulics of Wetlands: Monitoring and ModelingEmily Spargo University of Wisconsin-Platteville REU Advisors: Drs. Kolar, Nairn, & Strevett

  2. Report Overview Wetland Hydrology Tracer Test Modeling Conclusions

  3. The Big Question What is the hydraulic residence time of the water moving through the wetland, and how can I most effectively model the flow?

  4. Few Models First in 1970’s Vary for specific type of wetland Complex Systems Inputs Surface & below ground flow Wetland Hydrology ? ? ? ? ?

  5. Tracer Test • Mechanics of a Tracer Test • Input • Sample • Break-through curve • Bromide • conservative • easy to measure • non-toxic

  6. Site Map

  7. Data Collection & Analysis • 8-day sampling period • Hand and ISCO samples • Bromide Ion Selective Electrode Analysis

  8. Modeling Zero Order Model INPUT OUTPUT BLACK BOX

  9. Modeling First Order Model INPUT OUTPUT Second Order Model INPUT OUTPUT

  10. Our Model • BLACK BOX • Groundwater model • Step Injection • Parameters: • Velocity • Dispersion • Tracer concentration after mixing

  11. Site 1 Field data Model velocity = 0.35 m/min. dispersion coefficient = 0.2 m2/min

  12. Site 2 Field data Model velocity = 0.01 m/min. dispersion coefficient = 0.5 m2/min

  13. Site 3 Field data velocity = 0.001 m/min. dispersion = 3 m2/min. Model Field data Model velocity = 0.001 m/min. dispersion1 = 13 m2/min. dispersion2 = 2.5 m2/min.

  14. Trends: Average velocity decreases Dispersion increases Reasonable trends Residence Times: Site 1 = 25.7 minutes Site 2 = 3.8 days Site 3 = 131.9 days Conclusions ?????

  15. MORE TIME Complete tracer study Increase model complexity MORE MONEY Purchase reliable equipment Increase pay for REU students Future Research

  16. Acknowledgements Dr. Kolar Dr. Nairn Dr. Strevett Denae, Danette, Jake, Jessica, Kim, & Todd NSF Grant # EEC-9912319

More Related