1 / 4

3. National cultures and management – the emic approach

3. National cultures and management – the emic approach. Learning objectives. explain the main criticisms of the etic approach to culture as expressed by emic scholars describe the semiotic perspective to culture understand hermeneutics as a philosophy of science

Télécharger la présentation

3. National cultures and management – the emic approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 3. National cultures and management – the emic approach

  2. Learning objectives • explain the main criticisms of the etic approach to culture as expressed by emic scholars • describe the semiotic perspective to culture • understand hermeneutics as a philosophy of science • recognize the main features of the ethnographic method of studying culture • discuss d’Iribarne’s approach to the cross-cultural study of management and organization • describe d’Iribarne’s characterization of management and organization in France, the USA and the Netherlands • understand what indigenous management concepts are, and be able to give a number of examples • discuss how etic and emic studies of trust in a cross-cultural context complement each other.

  3. Chapter Outline 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Methodological background The semiotic perspective Hermeneutics Methodological issues 3.3 D’Iribarne: Three logics of culture The logics of honour, contract and consensus 3.4 Indigenous management practices Japan Africa China 3.5 Trust as an etic-emic phenomenon Etic Emic 3.6 Conclusions Study questions Further reading Case: Management of phosphate mining in Senegal Case: Americans negotiating a contract in China Notes References

  4. Study questions 1 What is the main criticism of d’Iribarne of Hofstede’s work? Can this criticism be generalized to other etic studies? Explain your answer. 2 Why would a questionnaire study not be an effective research approach from a semiotic perspective on culture? 3 How does Philippe d’Iribarne explain differences in management and organization between comparable plants in different countries? 4 What are the main features of management and organization in France, the USA and the Netherlands according to d’Iribarne? 5 Why is an emic approach necessary to identify indigenous management concepts? 6 Please give examples of indigenous management concepts from Japan, China and Africa. 7 Explain trust in a cross-cultural context from both an etic and an emic perspective.

More Related