1 / 3

Comparison of Standard Inputs for Generated Processes in MC Analysis

This study compares ALPGEN, GRAPPA, and MadGraph inputs for W, Z, DY, Wbb, Zbb, DYbb processes with varying jet counts. Summary of results shows agreement and discrepancies, highlighting need for further analysis.

kyla-guzman
Télécharger la présentation

Comparison of Standard Inputs for Generated Processes in MC Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ME-MC comparison • Standard Inputs so far • ALPGEN • GRAPPA • MadGraph • Generated processes • ALPGEN (xs by mlm) • W,Z,DY + nj, n=0..5 • Wbb,Zbb,DYbb + nj, n=0..3 • GRAPPA • W,Z + nj, n=0..2 • W+3j available, xs by S. Tsuno • Wbb + 0j, xs by S. Tsuno • MadGraph • W,Z + nj, n=0..3 • Wbb,Zbb + nj, n=0..1

  2. Summary of Results • W+n jets • MG<AL by (0.5,3,5,6) % n=0..3 • GR & AL agree • Z+n jets • Everything ~OK • Wbb+n jets • MG>AL by (6, 2) % n=0..1 • GR & AL agree for n=0 • Zbb+n jets • MG>AL by (8, 6) % n=0..1

  3. Conclusions • Need to understand differences between ME-MCs • Study relative fractions by subprocesses • Compare kinematic distributions • Communication with authors • Work in progress • Generate remaining processes • CompHEP tunning • Shower -> Ntuples->kinematic distributions • Get NLO rates from MCFM

More Related