1 / 89

Spring 2009 ISTEP Report

Spring 2009 ISTEP Report. Center Grove Community School Corporation. From the Indiana Department of Education.

Télécharger la présentation

Spring 2009 ISTEP Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Spring 2009 ISTEP Report Center Grove Community School Corporation

  2. From the Indiana Department of Education “Due to changes in the test, its benchmarks and the new spring administration, these results are significantly different than previous versions of the ISTEP+ and don’t allow for direct year-to-year comparisons.” --September 16, 2009 press release The cut-scores for the exams changed The exam questions changed The administration of the exam changed

  3. Is it natural to make comparisons between previous exams and the spring 2009 exam • It is helpful to look at individual student growth and areas for improvement • The comparisons can assist school leaders in determining strengths and challenges for future curriculum work • It is helpful to locate areas for continued improvement

  4. CG Schools – E/LA all grades

  5. CG Schools – Math, all grades

  6. Demographic data for comparison

  7. Only 1 IN school matches most of our demographics

  8. Using size and per student expenditure….

  9. Three schools in the state ….

  10. Using our % of free lunch

  11. Three schools in the state…

  12. Using only suburban and size…

  13. Several schools may be compared

  14. Comparing to Johnson County

  15. Area school comparison

  16. Top 10 Indiana Schools(overall ISTEP)

  17. Top 10 Indiana School E/LA

  18. Top 10 Indiana Math ISTEP

  19. A more detailed look at CG Schools: CG MS Central

  20. MSC 6th Grade English/LA

  21. MSC 6th Grade Math

  22. MSC 7th Grade English/LA

  23. MSC 7th Grade Math

  24. MSC 8th Grade English/LA

  25. MSC 8th Grade Math

  26. Highlights indicated by the data • In comparison with state average changes between the Fall 2008 and Spring 2009 ISTEP+, MSC scored: • 6th Grade Math +4 points • 6th Grade Language Arts +4 points • 7th Grade Math +4 points • 7th Grade Language Arts 0 point change • 8th Grade Math 0 point change • 8th Grade Language Arts +3 points • In comparison with an average of the previous 5 years difference between MSC’s percentage change and the state average percentage change, MSC saw the most growth in 7th grade math and 6th grade math respectively.

  27. Areas for future focus • MSC spent the 2008-2009 school year looking at their special education program. New opportunities are currently being provided for students to receive additional instruction in math and language arts in their specific grade level. • Our SUCCESS program is now available for students for an entire school year. • We are implementing new remediation for students based on math and reading fundamentals.

  28. CG MSN 6th Grade English/LA

  29. CG MSN 6th Grade Math

  30. CG MSN 7th grade English/LA

  31. CG MSN 7th Grade Math

  32. CG MSN 8th Grade English/LA

  33. CG MSN 8th Grade Math

  34. Highlights indicated by the data • MSN 6th grade ranked 44out of 687 schools passing both E/LA & Math and 45 out of 690 schools passing Science • MSN 7th grade ranked 17 out of 470 schools passing both E/LA & Math and 11 out of 474 schools passing Social Studies • MSN 8th grade ranked 19 our of 467 schools passing both E/LA & Math

  35. Areas for future focus • Remediation during the school day in Success class for students that did not pass ISTEP+ • Continued focus on increasing the performance of special needs students as measured on ISTEP+ • Implementation of RTI process to pair students with researched-based interventions and monitor progress. Students will gain ownership of their data and set goals for achievement.

  36. Center Grove Elementary3rd grade English/LA

  37. CGES 3rd Grade Math

  38. CGES 4th Grade English/LA

  39. CGES 4th Grade Mathematics

  40. CGES 5th Grade English/LA

  41. CGES 5th Grade Math

  42. CGES Highlights indicated by data • 15 3rd grade students achieved 6 points and 19 achieved 5 points on Writing Applications and 31 received 4 points on Writing Application. Highest ever for CGES. • In 4th grade, there was a zero % gap between males and females in mathematics (both at 87%). There was only a 2% gap in both English/Language Arts (92% and 90%) and Science, with the ladies leading in ELA and the gentlemen leading in Science (87% and 85%). • In grade 5, there was only a 1% gap in Math (91% for males/90% for females). Our general trend is holding firmly – by the time students get to our 5th grade, they are passing at the rate of 93-97%.

  43. CGES Areas for Future Focus • In grades 3 and 4, about one-half of the students who did not pass were within 15 points of passing – a gap we can bridge. • We are seeing a higher rate of poverty at CGES which aligns with a larger gap in performance. Only 45% of our Free/Reduced students in 3rd grade passed compared to 90% of paid students. Our demographics are changing. • Special Needs students passed this year at a much lower rate than in the past. 56% as compared to 75%.

  44. Maple Grove Elementary3rd Grade English/LA

  45. MGES 3rd Grade Math

  46. MGES 4th Grade English/LA

  47. MGES 4th Grade Math

  48. MGES 5th Grade English/LA

More Related