1 / 9

Agenda

USGEO Strategic Assessment Group Process Kathy Fontaine, US/NASA ST-09-01 Kick-off Meeting Brussels, Belgium July 29- 30, 2009. 1. Agenda. Background on Why, How, and What Assessment Methodology General Conclusions Highlights of Recommendations Applicability to ST-09-01. 2.

kyne
Télécharger la présentation

Agenda

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. USGEO Strategic Assessment Group ProcessKathy Fontaine, US/NASA ST-09-01 Kick-off MeetingBrussels, BelgiumJuly 29- 30, 2009 1

  2. Agenda • Background on Why, How, and What • Assessment Methodology • General Conclusions • Highlights of Recommendations • Applicability to ST-09-01 2

  3. Strategic Assessment Group Background • September 2007: Strategic Assessment Group (SAG) formed • Charge: • To deliver a strategic portfolio • of high priority national Earth observation investment recommendations • for existing and future capabilities • affecting Societal Benefit Areas • to inform decision-makers, • toimprove decisions regarding national investments in Earth observations • February 2008: Established SBA Teams • March 2008: Conducted 2-day workshop to review observational requirements for all 9 SBAs 3

  4. SBA Teams • Disaster • Weather • Oceans • Climate • Agriculture • Human Health • Ecology • Water • Energy

  5. Strategic Assessment Group Background (cont.) • June 2008: SAG writing team assembled • Initial framework - SAG document should: • Provide an integrated picture of national Earth observation priorities • Serve to focus near-term decision-making at the highest levels of our government • Consider measurements from all types of platforms: space-based, land and sea-based, airborne, subsurface, observations collected by humans, etc. • Address continuity of current measurements as well as the need for new measurements • Extend across all Agencies and scientific disciplines • Highlight investments that will maximize total societal benefit • Be of readable length (<20 pages)

  6. Observational Needs / Critical Measurements Hundreds Step 1: Gather • Identification and assessment of key observations • Drawn from national and international experts and documents • Measurements having benefits across multiple SBAs • OR • Deemed critical to an individual SBA Step 2: Filter Interagency Review and Feedback Measurement particularly at risk-- current or looming gap OR Measurement not yet being made but great promise for dramatic gains or a scientific breakthrough Step 3: Filter Some More Assessment Methodology 6 Recommendations A few Near-Term Threats and Potential Breakthroughs

  7. General Conclusions • The process adds a crosscutting perspective that compliments the individual agency processes • Roughly equal numbers of measurements facing gaps and presenting potential major breakthroughs • Substantial fractions of both space-based and in situ measurements were identified • Methodology chosen was tractable, enabling a focus from 100s of critical observations down to 10s of issues • Must be an ongoing periodic assessment because societal issues, measurement threats, and breakthrough opportunities evolve • Process can be a source for development of US positions on future GEO work plans 7

  8. Highlights • Recommended measurements span the nine USGEO Societal Benefit Areas • Of the recommendations that came out of the process • Roughly equal numbers of measurements facing gaps and presenting significant opportunities • Substantial balance of both space-based and in situmeasurements were identified • Reinforced the need for diversity of measurements to achieve scientific understanding • Ground truth / calibration • Course and fine-scale resolution 8

  9. Applicability to ST-09-01 • Process parallels needs for Output 3 • Would require review of the Work Plan as well as elements including but not limited to • Existing science and/or technology plans • Output of US-09-01a • Review process needs to be determined • Panel only or Panel then STC and/or Plenary or…? • [whatever else…]

More Related