1 / 15

Development of a National Pesticide Container Recycling Standard

Development of a National Pesticide Container Recycling Standard. Pesticide Applicator Certification and Safety Education Workshop August 18, 2005 Nancy Fitz, U.S. EPA Larry Schulze, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln. Overview. Current status of pesticide container recycling

kyne
Télécharger la présentation

Development of a National Pesticide Container Recycling Standard

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Development of a National Pesticide Container Recycling Standard Pesticide Applicator Certification and Safety Education WorkshopAugust 18, 2005 Nancy Fitz, U.S. EPA Larry Schulze, Univ. of Nebraska-Lincoln

  2. Overview • Current status of pesticide container recycling • Development of a national consensus standard on pesticide container recycling • Discussion

  3. Status: What is the ACRC? • The Ag Container Recycling Council (ACRC) was formed in 1992 to manage the collection and recycling of one-way HDPE (plastic) crop protection and other pesticide containers. • The ACRC is a non-profit organization funded by members of CropLife America. • ACRC’s annual budget is $3.99 million. • ACRC sampled collected plastic to determine residues; use this data in risk assessment model to determine acceptable end uses for the plastic.

  4. Status: Which containers are recycled by ACRC? • Plastic: High density polyethylene (HDPE) - #2 • Containers that held insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, stickers, spreaders, anti-foaming agents, crop oils, and micro-nutrients. • Size: A few ounces to 55-gal drums. • Accept containers from: • Farmers who grow food, fiber and ornamentals. • Forest, lawn care, right-of-way, golf course and structural pest control applicators.

  5. Status: Amount Collected per Year

  6. Status: ACRC Results • Since 1992, more than 74 million pounds of plastic have been safely recycled. • Consistently collect over 6.5 million pounds per year; almost 8 million in 2004. • More than 80 cents of every dollar is spent directly on collecting containers. • End uses include field drain tiles, speed bumps, parking stops, treated lumber substitutes for low-exposure outdoor applications (marine pilings, fence posts, etc.)

  7. Status: Current Challenges • Non-level playing field: ACRC collects all industry plastic, even that belonging to non-members. In 2004, a CLA member resigned because of this. • ACRC’s budget of $3.99 M can pay for a certain amount of plastic (around 8 million lbs.) Higher collection rate in 2005, so some collections cut off before end of year. • ACRC is investigating more economical methods of collecting plastic in areas of low container concentration.

  8. Consensus Standard: Background • American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASAE) is an accredited standard-setting organization • Goal: develop a standard for safely and effectively recycling plastic pesticide containers • Focused on the technical/process/safety aspects • Based on 10+ years of ACRC’s experience recycling agricultural pesticide & pesticide-related product containers

  9. Consensus Standard: Committee • Co-chairs: Nancy Fitz (EPA) and Johnny Berry (Syngenta) • Facilitator: Russ Hahn (independent) • Ag engineers: DuPont, Ohio State, USDA, VA Tech • AAPCO/SFIREG: AZ, NE, NY • AAPSE: GA, NE • ACRC: Chair, ex-chair of technical committee, communication lead, container manufacturer, technical expert • ASAE: Ex Officio participant • CLA: Stewardship chair • CPDA: President + 3 companies • EPA: OPP & OSW

  10. Consensus Standard: Scope of Draft Standard • Scope • Plastic (HDPE) nonrefillable containers up to 56 gal. • Pesticides labeled for agriculture, forestry, vegetative management, and structural pest control and pesticide-related products (adjuvants such as crop oils, stickers, spreaders, and surfactants) • These are containers that CAN safely & effectively be recycled according to the standard. • Not saying that these containers MUST be handled according to the standard.

  11. Consensus Standard: Draft Standard • Standard will define “processes” with necessary safeguards: • Rinsing • Preparing rinsed containers • Collection • Inspection • Rejecting unacceptable containers • Volume reduction (e.g., granulation) • Transportation • Storage • Processing • Determining acceptable end-use products • Manufacturing end-use products • Recordkeeping

  12. Consensus Standard: Schedule • April/May: Created committee with broad representation • May 24: Intro conference call • June 20-21: Meeting to discuss strawman document • July 7: Meeting to finish discussing strawman document • Late July: Circulate revised draft standard • August: Email/conference call discussion • September: Meeting to finalize document • December: Complete ASAE review process

  13. Consensus Standard: Implications • The standard will establish a baseline for how to recycle plastic pesticide containers safely and effectively (e.g., if new organizations or companies start recycling programs). • By itself, the standard will not solve the current challenges. • Once approved, the ASAE standard will be a tool that state/federal policy makers could use.

  14. Consensus Standard: More Info • ACRC program • http://www.acrecycle.org/ • ASAE • http://www.asae.org/ • ASAE Container Recycling Standard (X596) • Nancy Fitz, 703-305-7385, fitz.nancy@epa.gov

  15. Discussion • What are the biggest issues you see with pesticide container recycling? • Is the scope of the draft ASAE standard appropriate? • Are the processes/steps in the draft standard appropriate? • Other suggestions or feedback?

More Related