1 / 63

Compton Scattering at HIGS with Polarized Photons

Compton Scattering at HIGS with Polarized Photons. Compton@HIGS Collaboration. George Washington University Jerry Feldman Mark Sikora Duke University/TUNL Luke Myers Henry Weller Mohammad Ahmed Jonathan Mueller Seth Henshaw. University of Kentucky Mike Kovash. Outline.

lacey
Télécharger la présentation

Compton Scattering at HIGS with Polarized Photons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Compton Scattering at HIGS with Polarized Photons Compton@HIGS Collaboration • George Washington University • Jerry Feldman • Mark Sikora • Duke University/TUNL • Luke Myers • Henry Weller • Mohammad Ahmed • Jonathan Mueller • Seth Henshaw • University of Kentucky • Mike Kovash

  2. Outline • What (and where) is HIGS? • What have we done so far at HIGS? • polarized Compton scattering study of IVGQR • elastic Compton scattering on 6Li • high energy (60-86 MeV) and low energy (3-5 MeV) • What are we planning to do at HIGS? • elastic Compton scattering on deuterium • neutron polarizability • polarized Compton scattering on proton • proton electric polarizability • double-polarized Compton scattering on proton • proton spin polarizability

  3. Background Information on HIGS

  4. United States

  5. North Carolina

  6. Duke University

  7. TUNL HIGS TUNL Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory

  8. Duke Free-Electron Laser Lab

  9. RF Cavity Optical Klystron FEL Booster Injector Mirror LINAC Storage Ring and Booster Circularly and linearly polarized g rays, nearly monoenergetic (Eg= 2–90 MeV) Utilizes Compton backscattering to generate g rays

  10. HIGS Photon Beam to target room

  11. HIGS Photon Beam • monoenergetic photons up to ~90 MeV • energy will reach ~160 MeV by 2015 • 100% linear or circular polarization • high photon beam intensity • ~107 Hz at 20-60 MeV • ~108 Hz below 15 MeV • low beam-related background • no bremsstrahlung typical of tagged photons

  12. Polarized Compton Scatteringfor IVGQR Systematics

  13. DT = 0 DT = 1 L = 1 L = 2 Giant Resonances • collective nuclear excitations • GDR and ISGQR well known • IVGQR poorly known • photon as isovector probe • use pol. photons for IVGQR • map systematics vs. A • nuclear symmetry energy • neutron star eqn. of state • ratio of H/V scattered photons is sensitive to E1/E2 interference • sign difference in interference term at forward/backward angles

  14. Photon Asymmetry in IVGQR E1/E2 interference pure E1

  15. HINDA Array HIGS NaI Detector Array 55o 55o 125o 125o

  16. 209Bi Results for 209Bi

  17. Results for 89Y • extend measurements to 89Y • measured 124Sn last month! • lease 142Nd target from ORNL for $15k • other targets include A ~ 56, 180, 238 89Y preliminary

  18. Results for 124Sn

  19. IVGQR Systematics 89Y 124Sn 209Bi Pitthan 1980

  20. Compton Scattering on 6Li

  21. World Data SetD(g,g)D • Lucas – Illinois (1994) Eg = 49, 69 MeV • Hornidge – SAL (2000) Eg = 85-105 MeV • Lundin – Lund (2003) Eg = 55, 66 MeV • Myers and Shonyozov (coming 2013) Illinois, GW, UK, Lund Eg = 58-115 MeV

  22. Lundin Lucas Lucas, Lundin Hornidge EFT Fits to Deuteron Data Griesshammer 2012

  23. Quasi-free Compton scattering • Kossert (03) • Elastic Compton scattering • data from Lucas (94), Hornidge (00), Lundin (03) an = 11.6  1.5 (stat)  0.6 (Baldin) an = 11.1  1.8 (stat)  0.4 (Baldin) 0.8 (theory) bn = 3.6 1.5 (stat)  0.6 (Baldin)  +1.1 –0.6 an = 12.5  1.8(stat) (syst)  1.1(model) bn = 4.1 1.8 (stat)  0.4 (Baldin)  (0.8 (theory)  +0.6 –1.1 bn = 2.7 1.8(stat) (syst) 1.1(model)  Hildebrandt 05  Griesshammer 12 Summary of Neutron Results an = 12.6  1.5(stat)  2.0(syst) • Neutron scattering • Schmiedmayer (91)

  24. Experiment on 6Li at HIGS • experiment motivation • exploit higher nuclear cross section to measure a and b • cross section scales as Z2, so factor of 9x higher than 2H • solid 6Li target is simple • provided by Univ. of Saskatchewan • no previous Compton data on 6Li exists(except Pugh 1957) • energies: Eg = 60, 86 MeV • angles: qg = 40°-160° (Dq = 17°) • target: solid 12.7 cm long 6Li cylinder (plus empty) • detectors: eight 10”12” NaI’s (HINDA array) • good photon energy resolution (DEg/Eg < 5%)

  25. HINDA Array HIGS NaIDetector Array

  26. Experimental Setup

  27. Sample Spectra Full and Empty Targets Full  Empty subtraction 6Li(g,g)6Li Eg = 60 MeV

  28. Cross Section for 16O(g,g)16O

  29. Cross Section for 6Li(g,g)6Li L. Myers et al. Phys. Rev. C86 (2012) Eg = 60 MeV sum rule: a+b= 14.5

  30. Eg = 80 MeV 7.4% 12.8% Eg = 60 MeV Eg = 100 MeV (a, b) = (10.9, 3.6) 20.9% Da=2 Db= 2  sum rule: a+b= 14.5

  31. Cross Section for 6Li(g,g)6Li Eg = 86 MeV preliminary

  32. D(g,g)D Lundin (Lund) – 55 MeV Lucas (Illinois) – 49 MeV LIT Method for Compton Scattering Bampa 2011

  33. Nuclear Polarizabilityof 6Li (and 4He?)

  34. Nuclear Polarizability • nuclear polarizability affects energy levels of light atoms • non-negligible corrections for high-precision tests of QED • extraction of nuclear quantities from atomic spectroscopy • nuclear charge radius from Lamb shift in muonic atoms • usually determined from photoabsorption sum rule

  35. aE = 0.163  0.064 bM = 0.018  0.012 Nuclear Polarizability of 6Li

  36. q = 55 f = 90 q = 125 f = 90 6Li(g,g)6Li Eg = 3.0 MeV q = 55 f = 0 q = 125 f = 0

  37. q = 55 f = 90 q = 125 f = 90 6Li(g,g)6Li Eg = 4.2 MeV q = 55 f = 0 q = 125 f = 0

  38. Compton Scattering on the Proton and Deuteron

  39. Compton Scattering on Deuterium • unpolarized photon beam and unpolarized deuterium target • first use of our new LD2 cryogenic target • scattering angles 45o, 80o, 115o, 150o (Eg = 65, 100 MeV) • requires 300 hrs (65 MeV) + 100 hrs (100 MeV) • detectors: eight10”12” NaI’s (HINDA array) • arranged symmetrically left/right

  40. Cryogenic Target LH2/LD2/LHe (3.5K  24 K) • paid by GWU and TUNL • procured from vendors • assembled at HIGS • first run Oct. 2013?

  41. HINDA Array HIGS NaIDetector Array 55o 55o 125o 125o

  42. Sum-Rule-Independent Measurement of ap • linearly polarized photon beam (unpolarized target) • scintillating active target (detect recoils in coincidence) • measure scattered photons at 90o(Eg = 82 MeV) • scattering cross section is independent of bp • extraction of ap is independent of the Baldin sum rule • extraction of ap is model-independent • requires 300 hrs for 5% uncertainty in ap • detectors: four 10”12” NaI’s (HINDA array) • located left, right, up, down

  43. (point) (point) Sum-Rule-Independent Measurement of ap

  44. Polarizability of the Proton

  45. Scintillating Target simulations: R. Miskimen

  46. forward and backward spin polarizabilities Nucleon Spin Polarizability

  47. Polarization Observables Circular polarization RCP (+) Circular polarization LCP () Linear polarization

  48. Spin Polarizabilities of the Proton • measure S2x for first determination of proton gE1E1 • circularly polarized photon beam • scintillating active transversepolarized target (P ~ 80%) • scattering angles 65o, 90o, 115o (Eg = 100 MeV) • requires 800 hrs for DgE1E1 = 1 • detectors: eight10”12” NaI’s • 4 in plane, 4 out of plane Circular polarization

  49. Spin Polarizabilities of the Proton expand simulations: R. Miskimen

More Related