1 / 27

Having it both ways? Balancing personal and party representation

Having it both ways? Balancing personal and party representation. Michael Marsh Department of Political Science Trinity College Dublin. Presented Are PSAI Conference: Our Institutions Fit for Purpose? Political Reform in the Republic of Ireland TCD 22 June 2009. Objectives of PR-STV.

lamya
Télécharger la présentation

Having it both ways? Balancing personal and party representation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Having it both ways? Balancing personal and party representation Michael Marsh Department of Political Science Trinity College Dublin Presented Are PSAI Conference: Our Institutions Fit for Purpose? Political Reform in the Republic of Ireland TCD 22 June 2009

  2. Objectives of PR-STV • Provides a strong link between a particular representative and the voter and also allows voters to rank candidates according to any criterion, or collection of criteria they wish • This still allows for a degree of proportional representation of parties BUT ability to do so constrained by the extent that party is important to voters But what is the nature of the link between voters and parties?

  3. Proportional representation of parties • When party structures preferences: ie people give high preference votes to party of first pref candidate • OR • When bigger parties[on first pref count] get most of the preferences on later counts

  4. Extent of party voting in Ireland Irish national election study 2002

  5. Who gets lower party preferences Irish national election study 2002

  6. Voters and their TDs • Mean rating on a 0-100 thermometer scale of first preference candidate is 79 in 2002 ALSO • 69% of voters in 2002 and 71% in 2007 report speaking to their first choice candidate • 32% contacted public rep in years 1997-2002 • Half of the electorate was contacted by a candidate in 2002 and in 2007

  7. Voting for person or party • Only 20% mentioned ‘party’ in answer to an open ended question in 2002 • People rate their first pref candidate higher than they rate that candidate’s party: 79>76 • In closed ended questions, more people say they vote for the candidate than say they vote for the party • And many say they would follow candidate to a different party

  8. Party or candidate in 2007 Irish national election study 2007

  9. What motivates candidate support? Bars indicate coefficient for factors in multivariate OLS regression. All variables range between 0 and 10. R2=.0.34. Party coefficients not shown.

  10. Important that a TD… Irish national election study 2007

  11. TDs should represent % ranking each as the most important: Irish national election study 2007

  12. TD serving local concerns is a strength of the system? Q: The assumption that TDs should provide a local service is a strength of the Irish political system. Irish national election study 2007

  13. When best party and best candidate differ … Only 14% of all voters vote for party of best candidate only ‘Best’ calculated from thermometer scores for each party and candidate: Based on Irish national election study 2002

  14. Policy representation via parties? • Do voters have different policy preferences? • Yes • Do voters for different parties have different preferences: • not much • Do voters see parties as offering different policy stances: • even less • Is there any correspondence between voter and party policy?: • not really

  15. Do voters have different policy preferences?

  16. Do voters have different policy preferences?

  17. Do voters for different parties have different preferences? • Do voters see parties as offering different policy stances? • Is there any correspondence between voter and party policy?

  18. Summary • Voters have a choice of party as well as person • Many seem to take that, and for a majority, or at least significant minority, the candidate seems to matter more than the party • Voters want candidates to represent local area, for essentially extractive purposes, to get private rather than public goods

  19. Where does that leave parties? • Parties probably much more important than this suggests, since few voters clearly pick candidate over party, although party evaluations may derive from popular candidates • However, parties seem to be empty containers with respect to policy • While there is a recognition of left and right, these concepts have no clear policy implications • On classic left right issues, economic and social, little correspondence between parties and voters

  20. Conclusion • Perhaps in Ireland, balancing party and personal representation has a cost; policy representation is unclear • There may be other aspects of policy, such as valence – who will do the best job at pursuing the widely agreed polices – which do link voters to parties • Yet that implies more agreement on policies than we see in many instances • In general then the creation of party representation on through personal representation is achieved with only limited success

More Related