1 / 6

Group Think

Group Think. Rachael Gauss Brian Vecchione Moranda Lavasani Maria Mc Cuen Scarlett Schmidt. Definitions. A concept that was identified by Irving Janis A problem that develops when a cohesive group makes bad decisions

lanai
Télécharger la présentation

Group Think

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group Think Rachael Gauss Brian Vecchione Moranda Lavasani Maria Mc Cuen Scarlett Schmidt

  2. Definitions • A concept that was identified by Irving Janis • A problem that develops when a cohesive group makes bad decisions • Groups experiencing groupthink do not consider all alternatives before making decisions • They desire unanimity at the expense of quality decisions • Groupthink occurs when groups are highly cohesive and under pressure to make a good decision

  3. Negative Outcomes • Examining few alternatives • Not being critical of each other's ideas • Not examining early alternatives • Not seeking expert opinion • Being highly selective in gathering information • Not having contingency plans

  4. Symptoms • Having an illusion of invulnerability • Rationalizing poor decisions • Believing in the group's morality • Sharing stereotypes which guide the decision • Exercising direct pressure on others • Not expressing your true feelings • Maintaining an illusion of unanimity • Using mindguards to protect the group from negative information

  5. Solutions • Having leaders remain impartial • Using different groups for different tasks • Dividing into groups and then discussing differences • Discussing within sub-groups and then reporting back • Using outside experts • Using a Devil's advocate to question all the group's ideas • Holding a second meeting to offer one last opportunity to choose another course of action

  6. Prevention • Appoint a Devil’s Advocate • Encourage everyone to be critical of decisions • The leader should not express opinions • Set up smaller independent groups • Discuss decisions with outsiders • Invite others to bring fresh ideas • Collect anonymous reactions to decisions

More Related