1 / 147

COMM 5402 Advanced Interpersonal Communication

COMM 5402 Advanced Interpersonal Communication. Spring 2004. Human Need for Explanation. Need for theory in human mind 3 ways of experience the world observer theorist (observer & explanation) researcher (theorist & test). Defining Theory I. Defining Theory II. Theoretical Models.

Télécharger la présentation

COMM 5402 Advanced Interpersonal Communication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. COMM 5402Advanced Interpersonal Communication Spring 2004

  2. Human Need for Explanation • Need for theory in human mind • 3 ways of experience the world • observer • theorist (observer & explanation) • researcher (theorist & test)

  3. Defining Theory I

  4. Defining Theory II

  5. Theoretical Models • Units (Variables) • Laws of Interaction • Boundaries • System States • Propositions • Operationalizations • Hypotheses

  6. Questions • What about Truth? Does research lead to truth? • What exactly is the difference between adequacy and validity of a theory? • Why is a preferred theory determined by consensus and not by validity?

  7. Ideas to keep in mind 1) No a priori limits on what theory is about 2) A theoretical model has to be complete 3) Adequacy = internal logic 4) Validity is determined through research 5) Only testing makes a theory scientific

  8. Preferred Theory Is a matter of consensus - consensus about boundaries & scope - consensus about the internal logic - consensus about empirical evidence

  9. Standards of a Scientific Theory • Explanation • Prediction • Parsimony • Falsefiability • Utility

  10. Description vs. Research • Descriptions answers questions for the answer’s sake • Research tests predictions to validate a theoretical model

  11. Prediction focus on outcomes focus on variable values focus on stability & transition of system states Understanding focus on understanding of causal relationships among units Two Goals of Science

  12. Two Paradoxes • Precision: prediction without understanding • Power: understanding without prediction

  13. Assignment • In your group, think of an example for the precision paradox and an example for the power paradox. • Using your examples, determine whether they really are paradoxes, and try to resolve them (i.e., explain how they are possible)

  14. Explaining the Paradoxes • Precision: deterministic relationships among units lead to stable associations between them that can be observed • Power: theoretical models highlight significant relationships between units w/o accounting for ALL causal factors or their interactions

  15. Units defined: Units are mental conceptualizations that represent the parts of a theoretical model that interact with one another in specific ways.

  16. Theoretical Models Unit - Unit + - Unit = Laws of Interaction = Boundary

  17. Properties of Units • Units are things or properties of things • Units are plural, at least in principle • Units can be attributes or variables, i.e., are categorical or continuous • Units can be real or nominal, i.e., represent actual or hypothetical constructs • Units can be sophisticated or primitive, i.e., are defined or undefined

  18. Exercise: Determined the properties of these units • Relational intimacy in a couple • A person’s religious belief • A group’s ethnicity • Family communication patterns • A person’s height

  19. Homework Assignment Think of a phenomenon in interpersonal communication that is in need of a theoretical explanation (i.e., a topic for your term paper). Write a one paragraph research proposal answering the what & why questions. Due Wednesday!

  20. Laws of Interaction: • link units of a theory • do NOT imply causality • may be categorical • may be sequential • may be determinant

  21. Types of Interaction: • linear • curvilinear • recursive

  22. Efficiencies of Laws High Efficiency • rate of change • covariance • directionality • presence-absence Low Efficiency

  23. Conditions for Causality • Covariance • Temporal Precedence • Exclusion of Alternatives

  24. Conditions for Causality • Covariance • Temporal Precedence • Exclusion of Alternatives

  25. Propositions • A truth statement in regard to the theoretical model • NOT in regard to reality (i.e., no need for empirical truth) • Must follow accepted rules of logic • A statement about the relationship among units • NOT a statement about unit or set membership.

  26. Propositions & Laws • equivalent to a law of interaction • more limited then a law of interaction • combining two or more laws of interaction

  27. Empirical Indicators • Operationalization of a theoretical construct • Good Indicators are reliable and valid Reliability: consistency of measure Validity: measuring the right thing.

  28. Reliability and Validity Validity low high low Reliability high

  29. Types of Validity in Social Science • Face Validity • Does it make sense? • Content Validity • Is the entire concept represented? • Criterion Validity • Does it correlate with other known measures? • Construct Validity • Does it behave like the construct outside the model?

  30. Hypothesis: A hypothesis is a prediction about the values of units of a theory (where empirical indicators are employed for the units in each proposition) that allow researchers to assess the validity of the theoretical model.

  31. Three condition of a good test of a scientific theory • A) deducible • from the theoretical model • B) improbable • unless theoretical model is “true” • C) verifiable (testable)

  32. Factors: • Quality of hypotheses • Validity of indicators • Completeness of theoretical model

  33. Hypotheses Testing and Theory Development • Extensive Tests: test all strategic hypotheses • Intensive Tests: test only key hypotheses • Inductive Tests: build theory from empirical data

  34. Defining Interpersonal Communication Interpersonal Communication is any interaction between two or more persons who: * exchange information, * create meaning, * exert influence, or * establish social reality

  35. Intimacy • A widely used concept in study of relationships • A variable property of a relationship, including (among others): • Closeness & Interdependence • Self-Disclosure • Warmth & Affection

  36. Importance of Intimacy • Associated with relational development • Associated with relationship quality & satisfaction • Associated with personal health & well being (psychological & physical)

  37. Assignment • Define Intimacy. In 1-2 paragraphs, write a definition of intimacy that captures the concept of intimacy how you would define it for yourself.

  38. Four Approaches to Intimacy • Life Span Development • Develop identity  develop intimacy • Motivational • Individual need/ability for intimacy • Equilibrium • Dialectic between independence and intimacy • Equity • Intimacy as fairness and equality

  39. Intimacy in Romantic Dyads • Three Core Dimensions: • Intimacy • Love • Commitment • Conceptually distinct, but dependent on one another

  40. Love Styles (Lee, 1973) • Primary Styles • Eros: passionate, intense, powerful • Ludus: playful, non-committal, flirtatious • Storge: comfortable, stable, gradual • Secondary Styles • Pragma: practical, rational, pragmatic • Mania: manic, obsessive, extreme • Agape: altruistic, devoted, content

  41. Interdependence of Intimacy, Love, & Commitment Commitment LOVE Intimacy

  42. Validity of the MSIS • Face Validity? • Do items seem to capture the concept? • Content Validity? • Do items cover entire breadths of concept?

  43. Dimensions of the MSIS • Self-Disclosure (2,4,10) • Affection (3,12, 16) • Satisfaction (11, 14, 17) • Time spend together (1, 7) • Understanding (5, 13) • Feeling Close (6, 9) • Being Supportive (8, 15)

  44. Satisfied Couples Married Males = 153 Females = 156 Unmarried Males = 135 Females = 139 Dissatisfied Couples Married Males = 125 Females = 134 MSIS Population Means

  45. Social Penetration Theory • Relationship Growth = More Intimacy • Intimacy results from Self-Disclosure Increase Depths of Knowledge of Other Increase Breadth of Knowledge of Other • Motivation for Self-Disclosure is expected outcome (rewards-costs)

  46. Self-Disclosure and Intimacy Intimate Relationship Non-Intimate Relationship

  47. Four Stages of Exchange 1) orientation 2) exploratory affective exchange 3) affective exchange 4) stable exchange

  48. Social Exchange Theory(Thibaut & Kelly) • Terms O = Perceived Outcome CL = Comparison Level (Expectation) CLalt = CL of Alternatives (Expectations for alternative relationship) • Predictions Satisfaction: compare O and CL Stability: compare O and CLalt

  49. Relationship Outcomes predicted by Social Exchange Theory O < CLalt O > CLalt Satisfaction satisfied unstable satisfied stable O > CL dissatisfied stable dissatisfied unstable O < CL Stability

  50. Five Aspects of Exchange 1) Reward & Cost: Difference or Ratio? 2) Absolute Rewards and Costs 3) Immediate Rewards and Costs 4) Forecast Rewards and Costs 5) Cumulative Rewards and Costs

More Related